ARCHIVED — Bill Rosgen

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Bill Rosgen

COPYRIGHT REFORM PROCESS

SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED REGARDING THE CONSULTATION PAPERS


Documents received have been posted in the official language in which they were submitted. All are posted as received by the departments, however all address information has been removed.

Submission from Bill Rosgen received on September 9, 2001 via e-mail

Subject: Canadian Copyright Reform

To agencies concerned with copyright reform,

I wish to express my concerns regarding the Consultation Paper on Digital Copyright Issues (CPCDI). The proposals regarding intellecual propterty will sacrifice freedom of speech, to protect publishers of media.

I believe these measures are based on the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the US. This law has been disastrous for freedom of speech in the US. The respected academic Edward Felten was prevented from presenting academic findings in the field of cryptography because he was threatended under the DMCA. Also a Russian programmer was arrested in the US merely because he was the author of a program which was perfectly legal in Russia, but (without his knowledge) this program was distributed in the US, and when visiting the US for a conference he was arrested and awaits trial. I believe the provisions in the CPDCI are just as threatening to free speech in Canada as the DMCA has been in the US.

These provisions would allow a virtual ban on software which allows copy protection measures to be bypassed. This is similar to banning automobiles because it is possible to break the posted maximum speed laws. These provision would remove futher from Canadians the freedom of speech which is guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

I understand that freedom of speech needs to be limited in some circumstances, for example hate speech, which is a benifit to all canadian citizens. In this case, the freedoms of Canadian citizens would be sacrificed for (largely American) corporate interests. This would be the mark of a corporate state, something I, as a Canadian citizen do not wish to see happen here in Canada.

I would stronly urge you to remove the anti-freedom provisions from the CPDCI. The DMCA has been a flawed law in the US, it should not be imported into Canada.

Sincerely,


Bill Rosgen
(Address removed)
(I apologize for not being able to send a written letter, but the deadline is fast approaching)


Share this page

To share this page, just select the social network of your choice:

No endorsement of any products or services is expressed or implied.