The Minister of Industry is responsible for carrying out Industry Canada’s mandate and for advancing sustainable development through the Department and the Industry Portfolio. The Minister has jurisdiction over policy issues related to industry, trade and commerce; science; consumer affairs; corporations and corporate securities; competition and restraint of trade, including mergers and monopolies; bankruptcy and insolvency; intellectual property; telecommunications; investment; small businesses; and regional economic development across Canada.
The Deputy Minister and Senior Associate Deputy Minister are accountable for the stewardship of Industry Canada. They provide strategic direction and sound management to ensure that the Department contributes effectively to achieving the government’s priorities and that its wide range of activities is well coordinated and produces concrete results.
From an operational point of view, Industry Canada’s governance structure is functionally expressed through its committee structure at both the working and senior management levels, which support senior executives and ultimately the Minister. The committee structure is traditional in nature — divided between operations (Management Committee) and policy (Deputy Minister’s Policy Table). These committees provide oversight and decision-making authority in a number of areas including policy; IM/IT; and project management, procurement and contracting. They determine how allocation and reallocation decisions are made; and how programs are coordinated and managed to achieve the Department’s Strategic Outcomes communicated to Parliament.
The Department’s organizational chart reflects a number of organizational changes that occurred in 2008–09 and that are outlined in further detail below. It is important to note that this year’s performance report does not reflect the revised organizational structure, but is instead based on the Department’s Program Activity Architecture (PAA) for 2008–09. Given the timing of the machinery of government changes outlined below, they were not reflected in the 2008–09 PAA and are therefore not shown in this year’s performance report.
In 2008–09 the following machinery of government changes impacted Industry Canada:
In order to effectively pursue its mandate, Industry Canada aims to achieve the following three strategic outcomes:
The many and varied activities Industry Canada carries out to deliver on its mandate are organized around three interdependent and mutually reinforcing strategic outcomes, each linked to a separate key strategy. The key strategies are shown in the illustration below:
The chart below shows the full framework of Industry Canada’s Program Activities and Program Sub-Activities. These activities contribute to progress towards the Department’s three strategic outcomes for 2008–09.
Strategic Outcomes 2008–09 |
||
| A Fair, Efficient and Competitive Marketplace | An Innovative Economy | Competitive Industry and Sustainable Communities |
Program Activities |
||
| Strategic Policy Sector — Marketplace | Science and Innovation Sector — Science & Technology (S&T) and Innovation | Strategic Policy Sector — Economic Development |
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Marketplace |
Industry Sector — S&T and Innovation |
Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development |
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — Marketplace |
Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — S&T and Innovation |
Industry Sector – Economic Development |
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
| Office of Consumer Affairs | Communications Research Centre Canada | |
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
|
Competition Bureau |
Industrial Technologies Office — Special Operating Agency |
Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — Economic Development |
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Sub-Activities
|
Canadian Intellectual Property Office — Revolving Fund |
||
| ($ millions) | 2006–07 Actual | 2007–08 Actual | 2008–09 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Estimates | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Total Actuals** | |||
| A Fair, Efficient and Competitive Marketplace | ||||||
| Strategic Policy Sector — Marketplace | 6.2 | 10.7 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 18.2 | 18.1 |
| Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Marketplace | 86.5 | 82.4 | 95.7 | 95.6 | 116.6 | 107.3 |
| Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — Marketplace | 67.0 | 58.7 | 59.0 | 58.9 | 68.2 | 65.0*** |
| Office of Consumer Affairs | 5.9 | 6.4 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| Competition Bureau | 42.1 | 46.4 | 49.8 | 49.8 | 62.2 | 59.1 |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office — Revolving Fund | (28.5) | (21.3) | 4.9 | 4.9 | 139.5 | (12.9) |
| Subtotal | 179.3 | 183.4 | 227.0 | 226.9 | 411.2 | 242.8 |
| An Innovative Economy | ||||||
| Science and Innovation Sector — Science & Technology (S&T) and Innovation | 10.6 | 148.8 | 94.0 | 101.1 | 100.0 | 99.7 |
| Industry Sector — S&T and Innovation | 4.9 | 19.4 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 101.0 | 90.4 |
| Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — S&T and Innovation | 24.1 | 15.1 | 27.4 | 18.4 | 30.2 | 29.5**** |
| Communications Research Centre Canada | 50.6 | 42.9 | 42.7 | 43.1 | 60.3 | 57.4† |
| Industrial Technologies Office — Special Operating Agency | 409.9 | 431.8 | 265.8 | 311.8 | 333.5 | 294.6 |
| Subtotal | 500.1 | 658.0 | 439.3 | 483.9 | 625.0 | 571.6 |
| Competitive Industry and Sustainable Communities | ||||||
| Strategic Policy Sector — Economic Development | 12.2 | 11.7 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 15.5 | 15.4 |
| Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development | 352.8 | 292.2 | 225.6 | 235.6 | 315.4 | 272.3 |
| Industry Sector — Economic Development | 68.4 | 168.6 | 66.0 | 66.0 | 81.4 | 77.9 |
| Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — Economic Development | 76.9 | 50.1 | 8.0 | 26.1‡ | 43.7 | 43.6 |
| Mackenzie Gas Project | - | - | - | - | 7.9 | 5.0 |
| Subtotal | 510.3 | 522.6 | 306.2 | 334.2 | 464.0 | 414.2 |
| Budgetary Main Estimates | 1,189.6 | 1,363.9 | 972.5 | 1,045.0 | 1,500.1 | 1,228.6 |
| Non-Budgetary Main Estimates | - | - | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.8 | - |
| Total | 1,189.6 | 1,363.9 | 973.3 | 1,045.8 | 1,502.9 | 1,228.6 |
| Less: Non-Respendable revenue˜ | (522.3) | (569.2) | N/A | (475.4) | N/A | (4,767.5) |
| Plus: Cost of services received without charge˜ | 84.8 | 84.5 | N/A | 83.4 | N/A | 87.1 |
| Net Cost of Department | 752.2 | 879.2 | 973.3 | 653.8 | 1,502.9 | (3,451.8) |
| Full-Time Equivalents | 5,521 | 5,392 | 5,719 | 5,341 | ||
* Minor differences are due to rounding.
** Internal Services spending is prorated across all program activities.
***The variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending relates to the increased salary costs from collective agreements and retroactive pays, as well as internal funding reallocations towards program legislative and regulatory priorities relating to spectrum / telecommunications management.
**** The $28-million payment is the third instalment of the $120-million conditional grant for CANARIE’s Advanced Network. The amount paid is based on CANARIE’s cash flow requirements, reported annually to the Minister before an instalment is issued.
† The variance is a result of increased salary costs from collective agreements, recapitalization of scientific equipment, increased respendable revenues from collaborative research agreements and campus operations activities, and spectrum monitoring support for the Vancouver 2010 Winter Games.
‡ No resources were reported in the RPP for the Community Access Program and the Computers for Schools program, as the program authorities were still pending at the time.
˜ Non-Respendable Revenue and services received without charge are not included in the Main Estimates or Total Authorities of the Department. In 2008–09, Industry Canada received funding for an auction sale in the amount of $4.3 billion, which is reported in total in the DPR and Public Accounts as revenue on a cash basis. From an accrual accounting perspective, this auction is considered as deferred revenues since the economic benefit will occur over 10 years.
The content of this page was useful to me.