| Performance Indicators | Results | Trend | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory and administrative capacity | Canada placed the 6th-smallest administrative burden on start-ups amongst OECD countries in 2008 (up from the 8th-smallest burden in 2003)1 | Improving | ||||
| Program Activity | 2007–08 Actual Spending ($ millions) |
2008–09 ($ millions) | ||||
| Main Estimates | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | ||
| Strategic Policy Sector — Marketplace | 10.7 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 18.2 | 18.1 | A Fair and Secure Marketplace |
| Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Marketplace | 82.4 | 95.7 | 95.6 | 116.6 | 107.3 | |
| Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Sector — Marketplace | 58.7 | 59.0 | 58.9 | 68.2 | 65.0* | |
| Office of Consumer Affairs | 6.4 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 6.4 | 6.3 | |
| Competition Bureau | 46.4 | 49.8 | 49.8 | 62.2 | 59.1 | |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office — Revolving Fund | (21.3) | 4.9 | 4.9 | 139.5 | (12.9) | |
* The variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending relates to the increased salary costs from collective agreements and retroactive pays, as well as internal funding reallocations towards program legislative and regulatory priorities relating to spectrum / telecom management.
| Performance Indicators | Results | Trend | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people in science and technology occupations as a share of total employment | 1.2 million in 2008, or 7% of total employment; an increase of 0.41 percentage points from 20042 | Improving | ||||
| Program Activity | 2007–08 Actual Spending ($ millions) | 2008–09 ($ millions) | ||||
| Main Estimates | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | ||
| Science and Innovation Sector — Science and Technology (S&T) and Innovation | 148.8 | 94.0 | 101.1 | 100.0 | 99.7 | Strong Economic Growth |
| Industry Sector — S&T and Innovation | 19.4 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 101.0 | 90.4 | |
| SITT Sector — S&T and Innovation | 15.1 | 27.4 | 18.4 | 30.2 | 29.5 | |
| Communications Research Centre Canada | 42.9 | 42.7 | 43.1 | 60.3 | 57.4* | |
| Industrial Technologies Office — Special Operations Agency | 431.8 | 265.8 | 311.8 | 333.5 | 294.6 | |
* The variance is a result of increased salary costs from collective agreements, recapitalization of scientific equipment, increased respendable revenues from collaborative research agreements and campus operation activities, and spectrum monitoring support for the Vancouver 2010 Winter Games.
| Performance Indicators | Results | Trend | ||||
| International ranking of Canada in the use of information and communications technologies | Canada ranks 19th out of 154 countries in terms of level of advancement in the use of information and communications technology (ICT), down from 9th in 20023 | Declining | ||||
| Program Activity | 2007–08 Actual Spending ($ millions) | 2008–09 ($ millions) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Estimates | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | ||
| Strategic Policy Sector — Economic Development | 11.7 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 15.5 | 15.4 | Strong Economic Growth |
| Small Business and Marketplace Sector and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development | 292.2 | 225.6 | 235.6 | 315.4 | 272.3 | |
| Industry Sector — Economic Development | 168.6 | 66.0 | 66.0 | 81.4 | 77.9 | |
| SITT Sector — Economic Development | 50.1 | 8.0 | 26.1* | 43.7 | 43.6 | |
| Mackenzie Gas Project | - | - | - | 7.9 | 5.0 | |
* No resources were reported in the RPP for the Community Access Program and the Computers for Schools program as the program authorities were still pending at the time.
| Management Priority: Integration, Use and Reporting of Performance Information |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
| Management Priority: New recourse and disclosure process required under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
| Management Priority: Corporate Performance Framework |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
| Management Priority: Integrated Risk Management |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
| Management Priority: Human Resources Modernization Initiatives |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
| Management Priority: Project Management Governance |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
| Management Priority: Integrated Human Resource and Business Planning |
Type: Previous commitment |
Strategic Outcome(s): All strategic outcomes |
Status
|
||
Industry Canada’s capacity to achieve its strategic outcomes depends on its ability to identify, manage and mitigate department-wide risks. In 2008–09, the Department continued to make progress in this area, advanced its Integrated Risk Management Framework, and used the standard approach and principles set out in the framework to update its Corporate Risk Profile (CRP). The CRP established a clear direction for managing risks at Industry Canada and presented an assessment of the Department’s risks based on government priorities, external and internal organizational context, current management practices, and available resources. It also identified the strategic risks that need to be managed (such as people management, recruitment, development and retention) to enable Industry Canada to achieve its mandate, strategic outcomes and the expected results of its program activities.
The Department depends on its workforce to adapt its organizational structure to new and shifting priorities. As such, our renewal initiative priorities are focusing on people, retaining existing expertise and recruiting new staff with the necessary competencies. Early identification and detection of potential vacancies for specific groups and levels, e.g., research, IT and engineers, could help mitigate these risks. For those specific groups, management training courses were utilized to increase the pool of qualified candidates for succession planning. A career path was also developed for junior engineers and Computer Systems Administration (CS) functional groups.
Nationally, the performance of Canadian industry sectors has been impacted not only by the economic crisis, but also by rapidly changing technology, increased demands and trade barriers in international markets, and the convergence of network technologies and multimedia services. Some sectors have rescheduled projects, reduced production and laid off employees. Industry Canada addressed the challenges undermining the performance of Canadian industries by identifying and analyzing specific issues and developing strategic partnerships with research and development (R&D) organizations and other stakeholders to mitigate barriers to commercializing technologically intensive goods and services.
Industry Canada’s total actual spending for 2008–09 was $1.23 billion. This represents a 9.5% decrease from 2007–08 actual spending, which was primarily due to variations in grants and contributions and other transfer payments, including a $105-million reduction related to the Seven Centres of Excellence for which funding was for one year only.
Industry Canada increased its operating budget from $403.9 million in 2007–08 to $423.5 million in 2008–09. This 4.85% increase helped the Department to deliver more benefits to Canadians and better contribute to its strategic outcomes.
D
D
This table illustrates the way in which Parliament approved Industry Canada’s resources and shows the changes in resources derived from supplementary estimates and other authorities, as well as how funds were spent.
| Vote # or Statutory Item (S) |
Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording | 2008–09 ($ millions) | |||
| Main Estimates | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | ||
| 1 | Operating Expenditures | 332.9 | 342.2 | 449.1 | 423.5 |
| 5 | Capital Expenditures | 12.6 | 13.0 | 21.9 | 17.7 |
| 10 | Grants and Contributions | 464.3 | 536.0 | 649.6 | 560.5 |
| (S) | Contributions to Employee Benefit Plans | 50.1 | 50.1 | 56.6 | 56.6 |
| (S) | Minister of Industry — Salary and Motor Car Allowance | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| (S) | Canadian Intellectual Property Office — Revolving Fund | 4.9 | 4.9 | 139.5 | (12.9) |
| (S) | Liabilities under the Small Business Loans Act | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| (S) | Liabilities under the Canada Small Business Financing Act | 81.7 | 81.7 | 110.3 | 110.3 |
| (S) | Grant to CANARIE Inc. (in connection with the Budget Implementation Act, 2007) | 24.0 | 15.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 |
| (S) | Grant to Perimeter Institute (in connection with the Budget Implementation Act, 2007) | - | - | 13.5 | 13.5 |
| (S) | Grant to Genome Canada | - | - | 29.5 | 29.5 |
| (S) | Spending of proceeds from the disposal of surplus Crown Assets | - | - | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| (S) | Refunds to amounts credited to revenues in previous years | - | - | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Total Budgetary | 972.5 | 1,045.0 | 1,500.1 | 1,228.6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L15 | Payments pursuant to subsection 14(2) of the Department of Industry Act | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - |
| L20 | Loan pursuant to paragraph 14(1)(a) of the Department of Industry Act | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - |
| L97b | Advances to regional offices and employees posted abroad. Appropriation Act No. 1 1970. Limit $1,950,000 (net) | 2.0 | - | ||
| Total Non-Budgetary | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.8 | - | |
| Total Department | 973.3 | 1,045.8 | 1,502.9 | 1,228.6 | |
| Human Resources 2008–09 | Planned | Actual | Difference |
| Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 5,719 | 5,341 | 378 |
1 Indicators of Product Market Regulation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2008
2 Employment by Industry. Statistics Canada, 2009
3 Measuring the Information Society: The ICT Development Index. International Telecommunications Union, 2009, p. 32
The content of this page was useful to me.