Canada at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)

Final WSIS Assessment 2005

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

28 November 2005


If the following document is not accessible to you, please contact us to obtain other appropriate formats.

Final WSIS Assessment 2005
(PPT, 38 KB, 11 pages)


Canada's Principles for WSIS, 2002

WSIS is about development

  • Promoting democratic government and governance;
  • Creating an enabling environment through appropriate policies, laws, regulations and practices;
  • Developing human capacity through education and training;
  • Increasing access to communication networks and information services;
  • Fostering the creation and preservation of local content;
  • Building new partnerships, increasing international cooperation, and promoting cross cultural dialogue; and
  • encouraging community involvement and empowerment.

Canada's Objectives for WSIS

  • Focus on mainstreaming "ICT for development" initiatives
  • Promote partnerships and inclusiveness as pillars for success in era of Information Societies — Canada's multi-stakeholder model
  • Reflect Canadian values, policies and program frameworks in WSIS outcomes
  • Promote Canadian experience, expertise and products at Summit
  • Encourage continuity, consistency with other international initiatives and Canadian goals

WSIS Outcomes:

Financing Mechanisms

  • Built on excellent work by the Task Force on Financing Mechanisms
  • No shortage of financing, the problem is access
  • Text emphasizes responsibility of each country to create an enabling environment
  • Importance of mainstreaming ICTs into National Development Strategies
  • Urges ICT-friendly policies by IFIs, donors
  • Voluntary Digital Solidarity Fund
    • 20 Members; approx. £5 million contributions to date

WSIS Outcomes:

Internet Governance 1

  • Significant international agreement on many issues:
  • Reaffirmation of Geneva principles on Internet governance:
    • The international management of the Internet should be multilateral, transparent and democratic, with the full involvement of governments, the private sector, civil society and international organisations [paragraph 29, Tunis Agenda]
  • Security and stability of the Internet are paramount because of its social/economic importance
  • Highlights importance of "freedom to seek, receive, impart and use information"
  • Need for international cooperation on issues such as spam, cybersecurity, privacy, protection of personal information and data
  • Gained ground on costs of international Internet connectivity
  • Turning the digital divide into digital opportunity

WSIS Outcomes:

Internet Governance 2

  • Internet Governance Forum
  • UN Secretary General to "convene" the first meeting of an Internet Governance Forum (IGF):
    • Not an oversight body, not to replace existing mechanisms
    • Mandate very close to Canadian proposal
    • Positive, development-focussed
    • To build on existing structures, provide discussion forum, coordination function
    • Lightweight, decentralized structure, subject to review
    • Meetings to be held in parallel with others where possible to take advantage of logistics, infrastructure
  • UN Secretary General to look at a range of options for IGF creation
  • Review of need to continue within five years
  • Greece to host first meeting in Athens, 2006

WSIS Outcomes:

Internet Governance 3

"A Process..."

  • UN Sec. Gen. will also begin an undefined "process towards enhanced cooperation" before the end of 1Q, 2006, involving all stakeholders, and "consistent with legal process"
  • The purpose of the process is far from clear — on purpose:
    • We are convinced that there is a need to initiate, and reinforce, as appropriate, a transparent, democratic, and multilateral process, with the participation of governments, private sector, civil society and international Organisations, in their respective roles. This process could envisage creation of a suitable framework or mechanisms, where justified, thus spurring the ongoing and active evolution of the current arrangements in order to synergise the efforts in this regard. [paragraph 61, Tunis Agenda]
  • Existing organizations should begin the process as quickly as possible and should provide annual performance reports
  • The ITU is recognized as a being a source of expertise which may be drawn upon
  • Most important for Canada: none of the critical functions of the Internet are touched

WSIS Outcomes:

Implementation and Follow-up

Builds on Geneva Plan of Action

  • Emphasizes need for partnerships, activity at all levels (international, regional, national, local)
  • Identifies toolkit of 20 approaches for achieving the targets from Geneva Phase. Key elements from Canada include:
    • Mainstreaming national e-strategies and ICTs; developing enabling policy frameworks, policy capacity; confidence and use; universal design and assistive technologies; youth; community-based development; inclusion of volunteers
  • Recognition of Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development (IC) and promotion of further development (new indicators, capacity building)
  • Recognition of StatsCan/Orbicom/ITU ICT Development Index, launch of next phase
  • Welcomes Connect the World
  • Follow-up at the International level based in UN system, but with expanded role for civil society and private sector. Global Alliance still being discussed.
  • Indicative list of facilitators for each of 11 Action lines (based on Canadian position at PrepCom 1)

But WSIS was not just about the text...

Canadian pavilion:

  • IDRC, Industry Canada, CePRC, StatsCan, CIDA

Canadian participation/announcements:

  • ePol-NET partnerships negotiated and launched on: community access; e-trade; ICT indicators
  • Telecentre.org launch (IDRC & Microsoft)
  • Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development: 2 publications launched
  • Orbicom: 2 publications launched
  • Indigenous Peoples' Event — 6 Canadian aboriginal youth
  • World Summit Awards: 4+ Canadian winners
    • e-government; e-health; e-inclusion; e-learning + African youth award
  • Numerous Canadian speakers in 250 side events

Canadian Statement:

  • Senator Mac Harb

Overall assessment

Canada made a significant and positive difference:

  • Set the agenda early, followed up with hard work, consistent representation, solution-oriented approach
  • A major contributor of financial and human resources
  • Played leadership role, particularly on Internet governance, but also implementation and follow-up, human rights, freedom of expression
  • Promoted the Canadian model in negotiations and in partnership events

And the rest of the world...

  • Tunisia seen as overwhelming success — 23,000 attendees
  • Developing countries satisfied
  • ICT4D emphasis in many ways became secondary to political agendas

Next steps

Implementation and Follow-up:

  • Framework is laid for Canadian agencies, NGOs and businesses to play a full role in implementation

Internet Governance

  • Need to continue work to ensure that Internet Governance Forum, and "The Process" stay within bounds of Tunis agreement
  • Need to work closely with partners

ITU

  • Play strong role in upcoming World Telecom Development Conference, Plenipot to ensure ITU plays a positive and appropriate role in WSIS follow-up
  • Continuing efforts to ensure ITU role in follow-up is appropriate, consistent with core mandate