Language selection

Search

Patent 2714733 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2714733
(54) English Title: BODY AND CONTAINER FOR TRANSPORT OF CONSTRUCTION SAND AND GRAVEL MINING, AND FABRICATING METHOD
(54) French Title: BENNE ET CONTENANT POUR LE TRANSPORT DANS LE CADRE DE L'EXPLOITATION MINIERE DE SABLE ET DE GRAVIER DE CONSTRUCTION, ET PROCEDE DE FABRICATION
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B60P 1/28 (2006.01)
  • E21F 13/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • VERGARA PINTO, RODRIGO ANDRES (Chile)
(73) Owners :
  • MINETEC S.A. (Chile)
(71) Applicants :
  • VERGARA PINTO, RODRIGO ANDRES (Chile)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2018-06-05
(22) Filed Date: 2010-09-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2011-03-21
Examination requested: 2013-11-04
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
1878-2009 Chile 2009-09-21

Abstracts

English Abstract

A folded hopper for a mining truck is disclosed. The floor of the hopper is made of an anti-abrasive material that is folded and of small thickness, which increases its resistance and simplifies manufacturing work, thus bringing about substantial savings of welding and reducing weight, while improving load distribution. The hopper is made of special steels, with its sides, front portion and shield that are folded. Furthermore, the folded hopper only uses large beams on the sides.


French Abstract

Une trémie pliée destinée à un camion dexploitation minière est divulguée. Le plancher de la trémie est fait dun matériau anti-abrasif qui est plié et de faible épaisseur, ce qui augmente sa résistance et simplifie le travail de fabrication, assurant ainsi des économies importantes de soudure et de réduction du poids, tout en améliorant la répartition de charge. La trémie est faite daciers spéciaux, et ses côtés, sa partie avant et sa protection sont pliés. De plus, la trémie pliée utilise uniquement de grandes poutres sur les côtés.
Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A mining truck hopper, comprising:
a floor having a front and a rear;
first and second sidewalls extending upwardly from the floor, the first and
second
sidewalls having outside surfaces;
a front wall extending upwardly from the front of the floor and extending
between
the first and second sidewalls;
a shield wall extending forwardly from the front wall in a direction away from
the
rear of the floor;
the floor and the first and second sidewalls are joined by folds and there are
no
welds between the floor and the first and second sidewalls;
the shield wall includes a shield fold that extends transversely to the first
and
second sidewalls, and the shield fold is located forward of the front wall and
rearward of
a front end of the shield wall;
the front wall includes a plurality of folds that extend transversely to the
first and
second sidewalls and parallel to the shield fold;
the floor, the first and second sidewalls, the front wall, and the shield wall
are
made of steel; and
the first and second sidewalls are supported by two folded beams on the
outside
surfaces of the first and second sidewalls.
2. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the steel has a hardness of
at least
200 Brinell.
3. The mining truck hopper of claim 2, wherein the steel has a hardness
between
200 ¨ 450 Brinell.

4. The mining truck hopper of claim 2, wherein the steel has a hardness
between
200-500 Brinell.
5. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the steel has a strength of
at least
300 MPa.
6. The mining truck hopper of any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the steel
has a
strength between 300 ¨ 700 MPa
7. The mining truck hopper of claim 5, wherein the steel has a strength of
between
300-700 MPa
8. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the steel is A514 steel
9. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the steel has a thickness of
at least
6 mm
10. The mining truck hopper of any one of claims 2 to 7, wherein the steel
has a
thickness between 6mm ¨ 25 mm
11. The mining truck hopper of claim 9, wherein the steel has a thickness
of between
6-25 mm.
12. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the folds in the front wall
extend
from adjacent to the floor, and extend from the first sidewall to the second
sidewall
13. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the shield fold extends
from one side
of the shield wall to an opposite side of the shield wall
14. The mining truck hopper of claim 1, wherein the floor is sloped
downwardly with
the rear of the floor disposed higher than the front, the front wall is sloped
in a forward
direction with an upper portion of the front wall spaced further from the rear
of the floor
than a lower portion of the front wall
11

15. A hopper structure configured to transport mining material, comprising.
a floor having a front and rear,
first and second sidewalls extending upwardly from the floor, the first and
second
sidewalls having outside surfaces,
a front wall extending upwardly from the front of the floor and extending
between
the first and second sidewalls,
a shield wall extending forwardly from the front wall in a direction away from
the
rear of the floor;
the floor and the first and second sidewalls are joined by folds and there are
no
welds between the floor and the first and second sidewalls,
the shield wall includes a shield fold that extends transversely to the first
and
second sidewalls, and the shield fold is located forward of the front wall and
rearward of
a front end of the shield wall,
the front wall includes a plurality of folds that extend transversely to the
first and
second sidewalls and parallel to the shield fold, the floor, the first and
second sidewalls,
the front wall, and the shield wall are made of steel having a hardness
between 200 ¨
500 Brinell, a strength between 300 ¨ 700 MPa, and a thickness between 6 ¨ 25
mm;
and
the first and second sidewalls are supported by two folded beams on the
outside
surfaces of the first and second sidewalls
16. The hopper structure of claim 15, wherein the steel is A514 steel
17. The hopper structure of claim 15, wherein the folds in the front wall
extend from
adjacent to the floor, and extend from the first sidewall to the second
sidewall.
12

18. The hopper structure of claim 15, wherein the shield fold extends from
one side
of the shield wall to an opposite side of the shield wall.
19. The hopper structure of claim 15, wherein the floor is sloped
downwardly with the
rear of the floor disposed higher than the front; the front wall is sloped in
a forward
direction with an upper portion of the front wall spaced further from the rear
of the floor
than a lower portion of the front wall.
13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Body and container for transport of construction sand and gravel mining, and
fabricating method
Field of the Invention
The present inventions relates to hoppers and methods for constructing
hoppers.
These hoppers may be applied to mining trucks and aggregate trucks in general.
The
invention also relates to train freight cars and to methods of constructing
train freight cars.
Background to the Invention
Hoppers for mining trucks are known, as are aggregate trucks in general, and
train
freight cars of different designs and shapes that are used to transport
materials or mineral
ore of differing granulometries, particle sizes and densities, which causes
the volume or
tonnage to differ depending of the latter parameter as regards an identical
volume.
Hoppers are generally made from structural steel and, in some cases, anti-
abrasive steels,
depending on the application and loading system. This latter point differs
from each site,
giving a better or worse condition with respect to the loading of the
material. Sometime the
material is loaded through a chute, which is a rather gradual and controlled
loading. Other
times the loading is an impact loading, such as for example in the case of a
front loader
wherein the load projects over by the sides of the hopper and the load drops
instantly on
the loading area or on a side of the hopper. Sometimes the operator loses
sight of the
equipment or load. In all loading cases, the welds that are used to join sides
and floor or
front and floor become seriously damaged by various means.
It is advantageous, for all of the aforementioned conditions, to have stronger

hoppers given current conditions and trends in the mining industry, which
prefers larger
equipment and greater loading capacity, with greater equipment maintenance
availability.
To achieve this effect, larger and stronger hoppers are required. A larger
number of
structures would facilitate making the hoppers stronger and/or thicker in
order to absorb
impacts, in addition to increasing availability as a result of the wearing of
the plates that
are in contact with the material and aggregate's sliding upon emptying.
1
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

Known materials and methods of construction make the hopper and components
sturdier, increasing its own weight along with a consequent decrease in the
material
transported, depleting from the equipment (trucks or freight cars) loading
capacity. On the
other hand, if a lighter hopper is made, sacrificing the thickness and
materials of its
structure, the frequency of its maintenance or replacements will have to be
increased to
cope with the decreased equipment availability due to frequent maintenance.
Users
seek a balance of a hopper being able to resist loads and impacts and
abrasion, and, in
turn, light for its availability for corrective maintenance to be greater.
Summary of the Invention
In accordance with a broad aspect of the present invention there is provided a

hopper suitable for use on a mining truck, the hopper comprising selected
regions
strengthened by folded elements.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a

mining truck hopper, comprising:
a floor having a front and a rear;
first and second sidewalls extending upwardly from the floor, the first and
second
sidewalls having outside surfaces;
a front wall extending upwardly from the front of the floor and extending
between
the first and second sidewalls;
a shield wall extending forwardly from the front wall in a direction away from
the
rear of the floor;
the floor and the first and second sidewalls are joined by folds and there are
no
welds between the floor and the first and second sidewalls;
the shield wall includes a shield fold that extends transversely to the first
and
second sidewalls, and the shield fold is located forward of the front wall and
rearward of
a front end of the shield wall;
2
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

the front wall includes a plurality of folds that extend transversely to the
first and
second sidewalls and parallel to the shield fold;
the floor, the first and second sidewalls, the front wall, and the shield wall
are
made of steel; and
the first and second sidewalls are supported by two folded beams on the
outside
surfaces of the first and second sidewalls.
In one example, the steel may have a hardness of at least 200 Brinell.
In one example, the steel may have a hardness of at least 500 Brinell.
In one example, the steel may have a hardness between 200-500 Brinell.
In one example, the steel may have a strength of at least 300 MPa.
In one example, the steel may have a strength of at least 700 MPa.
In one example, the steel may have a strength of between 300-700 MPa.
In one example, the steel may be A514 steel.
In one example, the steel may have a thickness of at least 6 mm. The steel may

have a thickness of at least 25 mm. The steel may have a thickness of between
6-25
mm.
In one example, the steel may be one or a combination of anti-abrasive steel
that
is denominated or classified in accordance with its hardness, being from 200
to 500
Brinell, or over, at the zone that comes in contact with the material to be
loaded, or as
required. In one example, the resistance of the steel may be within a 300 Mpa
to 700
Mpa range, or over.
In one example, the folds in the front wall may extend from adjacent to the
floor,
and may extend from the first sidewall to the second sidewall.
3
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

In one example, the shield fold may extend from one side of the shield wall to
an
opposite side of the shield wall.
In one example, the floor may be sloped downwardly with the rear of the floor
disposed higher than the front; the front wall may be sloped in a forward
direction with
an upper portion of the front wall spaced further from the rear of the floor
than a lower
portion of the front wall.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided
a
hopper structure configured to transport mining material, comprising:
a floor having a front and rear;
first and second sidewalls extending upwardly from the floor, the first and
second
sidewalls having outside surfaces;
a front wall extending upwardly from the front of the floor and extending
between
the first and second sidewalls;
a shield wall extending forwardly from the front wall in a direction away from
the
rear of the floor;
the floor and the first and second sidewalls are joined by folds and there are
no
welds between the floor and the first and second sidewalls;
the shield wall includes a shield fold that extends transversely to the first
and
second sidewalls, and the shield fold is located forward of the front wall and
rearward of
a front end of the shield wall;
the front wall includes a plurality of folds that extend transversely to the
first and
second sidewalls and parallel to the shield fold; the floor, the first and
second sidewalls,
the front wall, and the shield wall are made of steel having a hardness of at
least 200
Brinell, a strength of at least 300 MPa, and a thickness of at least 6 mm; and
4
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

the first and second sidewalls are supported by two folded beams on the
outside
surfaces of the first and second sidewalls.
In one example, the steel may be A514 steel.
In one example, the folds in the front wall may extend from adjacent to the
floor,
and may extend from the first sidewall to the second sidewall.
In one example, the shield fold may extend from one side of the shield wall to
an
opposite side of the shield wall.
In one example, the floor may be sloped downwardly with the rear of the floor
disposed higher than the front; the front wall may be sloped in a forward
direction with
an upper portion of the front wall spaced further from the rear of the floor
than a lower
portion of the front wall.
As described herein, embodiments of the present invention are based on the
use of state of the art or cutting edge technological elements in order to
fulfil the
objectives required by current market, achieving resistance to greater loading
capacity
without increasing its weight from structuring the unit or lengthen its useful
life due to
floor abrasion to meet availability as required by the customer.
In order to facilitate the resistance and availability requirements there
presently
exist steels having greater tensile strength, from 300 MPa to 700 MPa tensile
strength,
depending on the type and origin. Embodiments of the present invention utilise
steels
having better mechanical properties, a structure being able to equal or
greater tensile
strength without having to increase the thickness of the materials, since
their densities do
not vary much, in addition to making a design with computer design methods and
tools
currently available in order to simplify the structure, said structure being
virtually analyzed
fast and safely, which allows the making of steel folds at critical areas of
the hopper which
makes it stronger. At the same time, in order for these folds to be made, more
powerful
and high-precision equipment is required, which forces us to use large folding-
capacity
technology having CNC's (Computer Numerical Controls) given the size of the
precision
pieces and the steels also require more power to fold due to their special
properties.
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

In one embodiment, in order to prevent abrasion wear, abrasion-resistant
steels
having hardness indices spanning from current 200 Brinell to at least 450
Brinell (for
example, 500 Brinell), being able to considerably increase the useful life
against abrasion,
but the tensile strength of which rises from about 800 Mpa to at least 1,400
Mpa are
provided, which requires, moreover, the use of more robust equipment than
traditionally,
as was stated above. This allows to provide a highly strong, highly available
product for
production, but having a low structural weight, thus allowing to transport
larger loads and
reduce the cost of fuel consumption, which, in large pieces of equipment, is a
factor of
considerable relevance.
Traditional manufacture of hoppers is based on very heavy structures having
standards beams. In some cases, special materials are used depending on the
design,
but they do not comply with the abovementioned objectives. As regards light
hoppers,
their weight is smaller in order not to reduce the truck's capacity, but have
a shorter
useful life due to shocks and/or abrasion, which forces the equipment to
remain idle for
more frequent maintenance.
As for applications of anti-abrasive steels, they are applied in their natural
state as
unfolded plates as a result of their high strength properties, and because
making them with
standard methods is very difficult.
Embodiments of the present invention include special handling when applying
the
materials, in particular the cuffing-edge steels described herein, since the
challenges
faced to fold the design, including the sizes of the components, and the folds
that are
located at particular and strategic places. These challenges are alleviated by
the
assistance of computer simulation tools so that the precise support for the
hopper may be
facilitated. This is facilitated by supplementing and adapting software
related to 3D
studies, together with finite element analysis upon developing each part, and
later the
general analysis of the assembly, simulating different typical working
conditions on
upward and downward slope, side inclinations, etc.
One embodiment of the present invention provides floor elements comprising
floor
folds with anti-abrasive side, the folding that reduces or eliminates welding
at joints and
6
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

floor, which improves mechanical resistance and alleviates stress arising from
heat
concentration upon welding.
In one embodiment, at the sides, reinforcement on several beams is simplified
by
two larger joining beams that keep the structure substantially rigid.
In one embodiment, at the front of the hopper, where the impact of the load
and of
the loading cone joins the cabin, this plate is folded and its form and size
reinforces its
structure by replacing outer reinforcement beams, decreasing the weight of the
hopper
and holding a greater additional load of material. The direction of the
folding or of the
folds may be transverse or longitudinal, or both, and it will depend on the
design or load
conditions.
Some features of the hopper shield are set out in the paragraph below. This
element, in general, is not analyzed in detail, only as regards safety
considerations
related to the protection the truck cabin against excesses or spills hood of
load from the
cone. In this case, in addition, the protective element was folded in order to
have the
necessary resistance. In this case the fold is transverse, but it may take a
longitudinal
folding condition, or both, thus eliminating several reinforcement beams and
especially
being limited to the load cone with a retaining effect so that the material
does not pass
that point towards the truck's front area, thus changing the load's center of
gravity, varying
the distribution of the load between truck axles, thus affecting tire wear,
among other
effects on the truck's structure.
In addition, using fewer beams and simplifying the design by the folded large-
piece
system makes its compact structure contain stress concentration points,
helping its
performance as a structural assembly subjected to cyclical stress, minimizing
the
likelihood of specific failures.
The supplement of each one of the studies on each hopper, both in the system
and in the database, allows us to adapt the design to the needs of each
customer as for
manufacture and design, being able to make improvements in accordance with
operational conditions at each site, that is, the density of the material is
low, with respect
7
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

to the one considered in the initial study, the hopper's volume may be
increased and/or
the thickness of the materials may be reduced, that is, lower the safety
factors where
indicated and allowed by the analysis without affecting a quality and reliable
product. The
direction and number of the folds in each part of the hopper or of the freight
car is
determined according to the structure, load parameters and study of the
components'
finite elements.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Embodiments of the present invention will be hereinafter described, for the
purposes of clarity and increasing understanding, with reference to the
following
drawings, and in those drawings:
Figure 1 shows an isometric view of a hopper in accordance with an embodiment
of the present invention, illustrating a shield fold for increasing strength
of the shield and
for resisting movement of transported material towards the equipment's front
area;
Figure 2 shows a rear view of the hopper of Figure 1, illustrating the joining
folds
between the equipment's floor and side; and
Figure 3 shows a side elevation view of the hopper of Figure 1, illustrating
the
joining of two folded beams, in form and size, which, in their layout, replace
several
beams having the same purpose.
Detailed Description
A preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a hopper shown in
Figure 1, which incorporates a simplified number of pieces to form a heavy
(from 100 to
400 ton) mining truck hopper. The hopper design shown in the Figure
advantageously
incorporates strategic simplifications in its manufacture, a reduced number of
components
and the application of steels (e.g., A541 steel), providing a hopper having
greater
resistance to impacts as a result of its design containing strategic folds,
greater abrasion
resistance from the use of the steels. It is also lighter because its design
eliminates
structural beams, making it an advantageous hopper for facilitating at least
some of the
8
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

objectives herein described, achieving a balance between the increased
strength and
reduced weight of the hopper. Advantageously, this provides several
advantages:
1. lower costs as a result of its longer useful life;
2. improved shield, which allows the loading cone not to move towards the
cabin, keeping load center, deceasing tire wear and, more importantly,
increasing the truck operator's safety.
Another preferred embodiment may be applied to small tonnage train and truck
cars, because the design is fully adaptable to any size and shape as desired,
since the
preferred designs are computer analyzed, proving the effectiveness of each one
of the
preferred embodiments.
As is shown in Figure 1, zone A, being a shield wall 10 having a shield fold
12 for
resisting and retaining the material moving towards the equipment's front zone
is
identified. The shield fold 12 extends from one side of the shield wall 10 to
the opposite
side of the shield wall 10 transverse to the sidewalls, and the shield fold 12
is located
forward of the front wall and rearward of a front end of the shield wall.
Further shown in Figure 1, Zone B, a folded front piece 14, improves body
resistance and eliminates structural pieces, prevents this zone from buckling
due to its
folded form, namely a plurality of folds 16. The direction of the folding may
be
transverse as shown in the figure, and/or may be longitudinal, as required by
the
loading to be applied.
Zones C and D, in Figure 2, show joining folds between the equipment's floor
18
and side walls 20. As for the fold, it may be folded along with the load flow
if required by
the study.
In Figure 3, point E shows the joining of two folded beams 22, 24 in shape and

size that, in their layout, replace several beams fulfilling the same purpose,
structuring
the assembly's side portion. The side plates may be folded vertically or in
the direction
of the flow, as required.
9
CA 2714733 2017-09-06

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2018-06-05
(22) Filed 2010-09-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2011-03-21
Examination Requested 2013-11-04
(45) Issued 2018-06-05

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $263.14 was received on 2023-10-26


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-09-16 $253.00
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-09-16 $624.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2010-09-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2012-09-17 $100.00 2012-07-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2013-09-16 $100.00 2013-09-10
Request for Examination $800.00 2013-11-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2014-09-16 $100.00 2014-07-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2015-09-16 $200.00 2015-09-15
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2016-09-16 $200.00 2016-09-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2017-09-18 $200.00 2017-09-18
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2018-04-06
Final Fee $300.00 2018-04-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2018-09-17 $200.00 2018-09-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2019-09-16 $200.00 2019-09-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2020-09-16 $250.00 2020-08-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2021-09-16 $255.00 2021-10-25
Late Fee for failure to pay new-style Patent Maintenance Fee 2021-10-25 $150.00 2021-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2022-09-16 $255.00 2021-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2023-09-18 $254.49 2022-10-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2024-09-16 $263.14 2023-10-26
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MINETEC S.A.
Past Owners on Record
VERGARA PINTO, RODRIGO ANDRES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Maintenance Fee Payment 2020-08-27 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2021-10-25 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2022-10-07 1 33
Abstract 2010-09-16 1 13
Description 2010-09-16 8 279
Claims 2010-09-16 4 82
Drawings 2010-09-16 2 55
Representative Drawing 2011-02-22 1 25
Cover Page 2011-03-09 1 54
Description 2015-09-24 8 287
Claims 2015-09-24 2 37
Drawings 2015-09-24 2 52
Description 2016-08-29 9 400
Claims 2016-08-29 4 107
Amendment 2017-09-06 21 773
Description 2017-09-06 9 406
Claims 2017-09-06 4 107
Final Fee 2018-04-06 2 53
Representative Drawing 2018-05-03 1 14
Cover Page 2018-05-03 1 43
Assignment 2010-09-16 4 99
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-11-04 2 50
Prosecution-Amendment 2015-03-24 4 246
Amendment 2015-09-24 24 848
Examiner Requisition 2016-03-01 4 300
Amendment 2016-08-29 17 642
Examiner Requisition 2017-03-08 3 188
Maintenance Fee Payment 2023-10-26 1 33