Language selection

Search

Patent 2807691 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2807691
(54) English Title: GROUND EXPANDED GRAPHITE AGGLOMERATES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND APPLICATIONS OF THE SAME
(54) French Title: AGGLOMERATS DE GRAPHITE EXPANSE BROYES, LEURS PROCEDES DE PREPARATION ET APPLICATIONS
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C01B 32/20 (2017.01)
  • C01B 32/21 (2017.01)
  • H01B 1/04 (2006.01)
  • H01B 1/18 (2006.01)
  • H01B 1/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • GRIVEI, EUSEBIU (Belgium)
  • ROTA, FABIO (Switzerland)
  • RIETSCH, JEAN-CHRISTOPHE (Switzerland)
  • ZUERCHER, SIMONE (Switzerland)
  • GILARDI, RAFFAELE (Switzerland)
  • SPAHR, MICHAEL (Switzerland)
(73) Owners :
  • IMERYS GRAPHITE & CARBON SWITZERLAND LTD. (Switzerland)
(71) Applicants :
  • TIMCAL S.A. (Switzerland)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2019-02-26
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2011-08-11
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2012-02-16
Examination requested: 2016-02-26
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2011/063866
(87) International Publication Number: WO2012/020099
(85) National Entry: 2013-02-07

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/372,479 United States of America 2010-08-11
10172468.0 European Patent Office (EPO) 2010-08-11

Abstracts

English Abstract

The present disclosure relates to ground expanded graphite agglomerate compositions, methods for making such agglomerates, their use as conductive additive, and conductive composites comprising such ground expanded graphite agglomerates. The disclosure also pertains to methods for making such composites and the use of such composites in preparing thermally conductive materials. The agglomerates are characterized by a certain softness allowing the agglomerates to dissolve, e.g., through shear forces applied during compounding, thereby leading to an improved feedability and a highly homogenous distribution of the expanded graphite material in the composite matrix.


French Abstract

Cette invention concerne des compositions d'agglomérats de graphite expansé broyés, des procédés pour les préparer, leur utilisation à titre d'additif conducteur, et des composites conducteurs comprenant lesdits agglomérats de graphite expansé broyés. Cette invention concerne également des procédés de fabrication desdits composites et leur utilisation pour préparer des matériaux thermiquement conducteurs. Les agglomérats sont caractérisés par une certaine tendreté permettant leur dissolution, par exemple, sous l'action des forces de cisaillement appliquées lors de l'élaboration du mélange, conduisant ainsi à une capacité d'alimentation améliorée et une distribution très homogène du matériau de graphite expansé dans la matrice composite.
Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege
is claimed are defined as follows:
1. Graphite agglomerates comprising ground expanded graphite particles
compacted together, wherein said agglomerates are in granular form.
2. The graphite agglomerates of claim 1, wherein the ground expanded
graphite
particles have a mean particle size (d50) ranging from 5 µm to 500 µm.
3. The graphite agglomerates of claim 2, wherein the ground expanded
graphite
particles have a mean particle size (d50) ranging from 20 µm to 200 µm.
4. The graphite agglomerates of claim 3, wherein the ground expanded
graphite
particles have a mean particle size (d50) ranging from 30 to 100 µm.
5. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 4, having a granule
size
ranging from 100 µm to 10 mm.
6. The graphite agglomerates of claim 5, having a granule size ranging from
200
µm to 4 mm.
7. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein at least
10
wt% of the agglomerates remain above a 250 µm Mesh sieve after soft
vibrating
sieving according to DIN 51938.
8. The graphite agglomerates of claim 7, wherein at least 25 wt% or at
least 40
wt% of the agglomerates remain above a 250 µm Mesh sieve after said soft
vibrating
sieving.
9. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 8, having a specific
BET
surface area ranging from 8 m2/g to 200 m2/g.
10. The graphite agglomerates of claim 9, wherein the specific BET surface
area
ranges from 15 m2/g to 50 m2/g.
- 30 -

11. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein less
than 20
wt%, of the agglomerates remaining on a 250 µm Mesh sieve upon soft
vibrating
sieving according to DIN 51938 are left on the sieve after subjecting said
remaining
agglomerates to mechanical water flushing sieving according to EN ISO 787-
18:1983
using a 250 µm Mesh size and 10 minutes sieving time.
12. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein less
than 10
wt% of the agglomerates remaining on a 250 µm Mesh sieve upon soft
vibrating
sieving according to DIN 51938 are left on the sieve after subjecting said
remaining
agglomerates to mechanical water flushing sieving according to EN ISO 787-
18:1983
using a 250 µm Mesh size and 10 minutes sieving time.
13. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein less
than 2
wt% of the agglomerates remaining on a 250 pm Mesh sieve upon soft vibrating
sieving according to DIN 51938 are left on the sieve after subjecting said
remaining
agglomerates to mechanical water flushing sieving according to EN ISO 787-
18:1983
using a 250 µm Mesh size and 10 minutes sieving time.
14. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the
graphite
agglomerates have a tap density ranging from 0.08 to 0.6 g/cm3.
15. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claim 14, wherein the graphite
agglomerates have a tap density ranging from 0.12 to 0.3 g/cm3.
16. The graphite agglomerates of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein said
agglomerates comprise at least one further component in particulate form.
17. The graphite agglomerates of claim 16, wherein said at least one
further
component is natural graphite, synthetic graphite, carbon black, boron
nitride,
aluminium nitride, carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, coke,
silver
powder, copper powder, aluminium oxide powder, steel fiber, PAN, graphite
fiber,
silicon carbide, graphene, or any combination thereof.
18. A composition comprising graphite agglomerates as defined in claim 16
or 17
and a second further component in particulate form.
- 31 -

19. The composition of claim 18, wherein said second further component is a

natural graphite, synthetic graphite, carbon black, boron nitride, aluminium
nitride,
carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, coke, silver powder, copper
powder, aluminium oxide powder, steel fiber, PAN, graphite fiber, silicon
carbide,
graphene, or any combination thereof.
20. A method for making graphite agglomerates as defined in any one of
claims 1
to 17, comprising compacting the ground expanded graphite particles together
to
form the ground expanded graphite agglomerates,
optionally wherein the compacting step comprises compacting the ground
expanded
graphite particles together with at least one further component in particulate
form to
yield ground expanded graphite agglomerates.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein said at least one further component is
a
natural graphite, synthetic graphite, carbon black, boron nitride, aluminium
nitride,
carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, coke, silver powder, copper
powder, aluminium oxide powder, steel fiber, PAN, graphite fiber, silicon
carbide,
graphene, or any combination thereof.
22. The method of claim 20 or 21, wherein the agglomeration is accomplished
by
a process comprising at least one step of:
i) employing a roller compactor, wherein the tap density is adjusted by
virtue of the feeding rate, the roll gap and the sieve size,
ii) employing a flat die pelletizer, wherein the tap density is adjusted by

the gap between the rolls, the die and die size, and the knives speed,
iii) employing a pin mixer pelletizer or a rotary drum pelletizer, wherein
the tap density is adjusted by the feeding rate, the moisture content,
the choice and concentration of the additives and the pin shaft or drum
rotating speed, respectively;
iv) a fluidized bed process;
- 32 -

v) a spray dryer process; or
vi) a fluidized bed spray dryer process.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein in step i) the ground expanded graphite

particles are fed with the help of a screw to a couple of counter-rotating
rolls to yield
a pre-agglomerate, followed by a fine agglomeration step whereby the pre-
agglomerates are pushed through a sieve which assists in defining the desired
agglomerate size;
24. The method of claim 22 or 23, wherein in step ii) the ground expanded
graphite particles are pressed through a die by pan grinder rolls, followed by
cutting
the pre-agglomerated graphite particles to the desired size.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the ground expanded graphite particles
are
cut by rotating knives.
26. The method of any one of claims 20 to 25, wherein the method further
comprises grinding an expanded graphite material to form ground expanded
graphite
particles.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the expanded graphite is made by:
i) intercalating a graphite material;
ii) thermally expanding the graphite material to form an expanded
graphite material.
28. A conductive composite comprising graphite agglomerates as defined in
any
one of claims 1 to 17 and a matrix material which is a polymeric material, a
ceramic
material, a mineral material, a wax or a building material.
29. The conductive composition of claim 28, wherein the conductive
composite is
a conductive polymer comprising a polymer matrix which is a polyolefin, a
polyamide,
a polyester, an acrylic or acetate, a polyimide, a thio/ether polymer, an
elastomer, a
- 33 -

thermoplastic elastomer, a thermosetting resin, a copolymer thereof, or a
mixture of
any of the foregoing materials.
30. A method for making the conductive composite as defined in claim 28 or
29,
comprising feeding a graphite agglomerates as defined in any one of claims 1
to 16
or a composition as defined in claims 18 or 19 to an extruder thereby mixing
the
matrix material and the ground expanded graphite agglomerates or composition,
followed by moulding of the resulting conductive composite into the desired
form.
31. Use of a conductive composite as defined in claim 28 or 29 for
preparing a
thermally and/or electrically conductive material.
- 34 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


GROUND EXPANDED GRAPHITE AGGLOMERATES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND
APPLICATIONS OF THE SAME
[0001]
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0002] The present disclosure relates to ground expanded graphite agglomerate
compositions for use as a conductive additive, methods for preparation
thereof, and their use
in composites such as polymer blends, ceramics, and mineral materials.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Graphite powder is a promising filler (i.e., conductive additive) for
thermally and
electrically conductive polymers and other composite materials.
[0004] Expanded or exfoliated graphite, also known as nanographite or nano-
structured
graphite, has recently attracted increased interest because of its excellent
thermal and
electrical conductivity properties. Expanded graphite outperforms non-expanded
graphite
and other conductive fillers (e.g., boron nitride, carbon fibers, carbon
nanotubes) in terms of
the thermal conductivity conveyed to polymers or other materials such as
cement or gypsum-
based materials. Adding expanded graphite to flooring materials to increase
the thermal
conductivity of the composite material is generally known in the art and has,
for example,
been described in DE-OS-100 49 230 Al.
[0005] However, disadvantages of adding expanded graphite - as opposed to
conventional
highly crystalline synthetic and natural graphite - to the polymer mass are
its difficult
workability and processability, its lower lubricating properties, its lower
oxidation resistance,
and its dustiness. In addition, processing expanded graphite in polymer
compounders may
result in flow problems that make it difficult to extrude the polymer
including the expanded
graphite. Problems in particular arise during the feeding of the expanded
graphite into the
extruder.
[0006] US 2009/0189125 to Grigorian et al. describes a process for preparing
electrically
conductive polymer composites comprising mixing non-predispersed carbon with
an
- 1 -
CA 2807691 2017-06-15

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
emulsion comprising a polymer in a liquid solvent to obtain a dispersion of
the carbon in the
polymer matrix, followed by removing the solvent from the dispersion
("solution
compounding"). Grigorian et al. also describe as a comparative example a
process on a
laboratory scale wherein expanded graphite was mixed with dry polypropylene
powders by
mechanical mixing (compounding) followed by molding the mixture into composite
sheets.
Grigorian et al. does not describe any processability issues observed for
expanded graphite,
such as problems related to feeding of the expanded graphite into the
extruder.
[0007] In addition, US 2007/031704 assigned to SGL Carbon describes conductive

additives for gypsum materials comprised of compacted expanded graphite
particles made
from ground graphite foils. The expanded graphite is first compressed into
large two
dimensional structures (i.e. graphite foils) having a thickness of between 0.1
and 3 mm and a
density between 0.8 and 1.8 g/cm3 and is then chopped, in a cutting mill, into
smaller
particles having a diameter between 1 and 5 mm and a bulk density of typically
between 0.12
and 0.25 g/cm3. The resulting particles differ in their properties compared to
the present
invention, particularly in terms of the hardness of the particles, which is
substantially higher in
the particles described in US 2007/031704. In particular, the hardness of the
expanded
graphite particles described in US 2007/031704 has a negative effect on the
thermal
conductivity and on the mechanical properties of the composite product as
compared to
powdered expanded graphite.
[0008] EP 0 735 123 A describes processes for making graphite composite
materials
based on expanded graphite and used in chemical heat pumps or treatment
devices for
industrial gases. In the process described in EP 0 735 123 A, the expanded
graphite is pre-
densified into a macroscale matrix or laminate by compression or lamination.
The composite
compact is then further processed by impregnation and subsequent drying,
followed by a
final compression step to bring the graphite product into its final desired
form. EP 0 735 123
A does not describe the use of the graphite as a conductive additive, e.g. for
polymer
products.
[0009] US 2008/0279710 Al by Zhamu et al. describes a method of producing
electrically
conductive composite compositions particularly useful as fuel cell bipolar
plates. The method
comprises blending expandable (as opposed to expanded) graphite powder with
non-
expandable graphite powder and a binder, followed by expansion of the
expandable graphite
by heat treatment. Subsequently, the mixture is compressed into macroscale
preformed
composite compacts such as sheets and blocks which are then treated to
activate the binder
in the composition resulting in the desired composite plates that can be used
in fuel cells
(see, e.g., the flow chart in Figure 2a). The patent application appears to
describe the
- 2 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
expansion of the expandable graphite portion of a mixture comprising
expandable graphite,
non-expandable graphite and a binder, and subsequent curing of the mixture by
combined
compression and binder treatments leading to composites of good mechanical
integrity while
exhibiting high transversal electrical conductivity. Zhamu et al. are not
concerned with
already expanded graphite powders, but rather prepare mixtures with binders to
produce
directly the desired composite compacts as the result of their process. While
US
2008/0279710 Al notes that expanded graphite is difficult to handle as
concerns mixing with
other powders such as non-expandable graphite, the solution presented to this
problem is
rather to mix the two graphite powders prior to exfoliation of the expandable
graphite, thereby
circumventing the problem of difficult handling due to the low density of
expanded graphite.
[0010] Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide expanded
graphite forms that
preserve the excellent thermal and electrical conductivity of powdered
expanded graphite
while offering good processability comparable to standard, i.e. non-expanded
synthetic or
natural graphite. It is a further object to provide a process for preparing
such advantageous
expanded graphite forms and furthermore to provide composites comprising such
advantageous expanded graphite forms.
Finally, it is yet another object to provide
applications and uses of conductive polymers comprising said advantageous
expanded
graphite forms.
SUMMARY
[0011] The inventors have found that expanded graphite can be ground and
subsequently
processed into ground expanded graphite agglomerates which are comparatively
soft, i.e.,
the agglomerates "dissolve" (i.e., deagglomerate) into finer particles during
or after their
addition to a matrix material, such as a polymer, thereby producing a
conductive composite
material having excellent thermal (and electrical) conductivity, while
preserving the
composite material's mechanical stability. Moreover, the agglomerates offer
better handling
properties as compared to unprocessed expanded graphite, which inter alia
offers easier
feeding of the graphite additive to the polymer during the production of the
conductive
polymer.
[0012] Thus, according to a first aspect, the present invention is directed to
graphite
agglomerates comprising ground expanded graphite particles compacted together.
Such
agglomerates represent a powder (albeit with a larger particle size) that can
still flow, in
contrast to compacted expanded graphite particles in the form of sheets or
other three
dimensional composite compacts.
- 3 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
[0013] In other words, the graphite agglomerates of the present invention
represent a
particulate matter which can be characterized, for example, by its particle
size distribution as
determined by soft vibrating sieving according to DIN 51938. For example,
certain
embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the present
invention are
preferably characterized by a size distribution wherein in the analysis
according to DIN
51938 from about 10 to about 80 wt% are retained on a 250 pm sieve, or from
about 10 to
about 60 wt% are retained on a 500 pm sieve, or from about 10 to about 30 wt%
are retained
on the 1 mm sieve, or less than about 5 wt% are retained on a 2 mm sieve. In
addition,
certain embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the
present invention
are preferably characterized by granules having a size ranging from about 100
pm to about
10 mm, or from about 200 pm to about 4 mm.
[0014] Moreover, such agglomerates may have a particle hardness/softness which
allows
at least a partial and preferably a substantially complete deagglomeration of
the particles
during the processing for preparing a conductive polymer, i.e. deagglomeration
into particles
having a mean particle size of well below 250 pm or even below 100 pm, which
leads to a
homogenous distribution of the "dissolved" expanded graphite particles within
the polymer
matrix. In some embodiments, the graphite agglomerates of the present
invention may
comprise at least one further component in particulate form, for example
natural graphite,
synthetic graphite, carbon black, boron nitride, aluminium nitride, carbon
fibers, carbon
nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, graphene, coke, silver powders, copper powders,
or
combinations thereof. Naturally, the agglomerates described herein do not
comprise
additional components acting as a binder which would counteract with the
desirable particle
softness of the produced agglomerates.
[0015] According to a second aspect, the present invention is directed to a
method for
making the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the present invention,
wherein the
method comprises compacting ground expanded graphite particles together to
form the
ground expanded graphite agglomerates. In some embodiments, the method further

includes grinding of expanded graphite material to prepare a defined starting
material to be
used during the compaction step for preparing the agglomerates. Optionally,
the method
may also include the preparation of expanded graphite from natural or
synthetic graphite
materials, which may be accomplished by intercalating a graphite material and
subsequently
thermally expanding the graphite material to form an expanded graphite
material. A general
process flowchart for preparing certain embodiments of the ground expanded
graphite
agglomerates of the present invention is shown in Figure 1.
- 4 -

[0016] Hence, ground expanded graphite agglomerates obtainable by the above
method
are a further aspect of this invention.
[0017] Yet another aspect of the present invention is directed to the
provision of a
conductive polymer comprising either the ground expanded graphite agglomerates
of the
present invention, or comprising compacted expanded graphite particles
prepared by
compacting or moulding an expanded graphite material into a macroscale article
(e.g.,
an expanded graphite foil as known in the art), and then grinding, chopping,
or milling the
molded expanded graphite article into particles of compacted expanded graphite
having
the desired size and size distribution. Suitable polymers include, but are not
limited to, a
polypropylene (PP), a high-density polyethylene (HDPE), a low-density
polyethylene
(LOPE), a linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), a polyamide, a polyester, a

polyarylene sulfide, a polyarylene oxide, a polysulfone, a polyarylate, a
polyimide, a
poly(ether ketone), a polyetherimide, a polycarbonate, elastomers (e.g.,
synthetic and
natural rubber), thermoplastic elastomers, copolymers thereof, or mixtures
thereof.
[0018] Finally, a further aspect of the invention concerns the use of such
conductive
polymers in the preparation of thermally and electrically conductive materials
which can
be used in a variety of applications such as heat dissipation in LED lighting,
solar panels,
electronics, etc., or as heat exchanger materials in geothermic hoses, floor
heating, and
other related applications.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a graphite
agglomerates comprising ground expanded graphite particles compacted together,

wherein said agglomerates are in granular form.
According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a
composition comprising graphite agglomerates as defined herein and a further
component in particulate form.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a
method
for making graphite agglomerates as defined herein comprising compacting the
ground
expanded graphite particles together to form the ground expanded graphite
agglomerates, optionally wherein the compacting step comprises compacting the
ground
expanded graphite particles together with at least one further component in
particulate
form to yield ground expanded graphite agglomerates.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a
use
of a conductive composite as described herein for preparing a thermally and/or
electrically
- 5 -
CA 2807691 2017-06-15

conductive material.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019] Figure 1 depicts a general flowchart of the process for preparing
particular
embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the present
invention.
.. [0020] Figure 2a demonstrates the increased feedability of the ground
expanded
graphite agglomerates in terms of maximal output from a Brabender FlexWall DDW-
MD5-
FW40 Plus-50 gravimetric dosimeter and single-screw conveyor as a function of
tap
density for particular embodiments of the ground expanded graphite
agglomerates.
Figure 2b compares the maximal output from the same device for the ground
expanded
graphite agglomerates with other materials known in the art, including a
milled
expanded graphite foil, standard synthetic graphite and carbon black. Figure
2c
shows a cross section of broken bending strength specimen. Picture on the
left:
Keyence VK-9700 Laserscan image of PPH-graphite compound with 25% GEGA
(i.e., particular embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates
according
to the present invention); Picture on the right: SEM picture of PPH-
- 5a -
CA 2807691 2017-06-15

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
graphite compound with 20% UP (i.e., ground expanded graphite powder (non-
agglomerated) of TIMCAL Graphite & Carbon).
[0021] Figure 3a shows the longitudinal and transversal thermal conductivity
of
polypropylene homopolymer (PPH, Sabic PP576P) samples comprising particular
embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates as a function of carbon
content.
Figure 3b again compares the longitudinal and transversal thermal conductivity
of samples
containing 20 wt% of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates with samples
containing
20 wt% of a milled expanded graphite foil, standard synthetic graphite, carbon
black and no
additive at all (100% PP).
[0022] Figure 4 compares the volume resistivity determined by the four points
contact
method according to DIN 51911 of polypropylene homopolymer (PPH, Sabic PP576P)

samples containing 20 wt% of ground expanded graphite agglomerates with
samples
containing 20 wt% of a milled expanded graphite foil, standard synthetic
graphite, and carbon
black.
[0023] Figure 5 depicts the thermal conductivity and volume resistivity
determined by the
four points contact method according to DIN 51911 for the conductive
polypropylene
homopolymer as a function of the content (by weight) of the ground expanded
graphite
agglomerates according to certain embodiments of the invention.
[0024] Figures 6a and 6b illustrate the flexural strength and flexural modulus
(ISO 178) for
polypropylene homopolymer (PPH, Sabic PP576P) samples comprising 20 wt% of
ground
expanded graphite agglomerates, milled expanded graphite foil, standard
synthetic graphite,
carbon black, and no carbon additive, respectively.
[0025] Figures 7a and 7b show data for the tensile strength and tensile
modulus (ISO 527)
obtained for polypropylene homopolymer (PPH, Sabic PP576P) samples comprising
20 wt%
of ground expanded graphite agglomerates, milled expanded graphite foil,
standard synthetic
graphite, carbon black, and no carbon additive, respectively.
[0026] Figures 8a and 8b illustrate the longitudinal and transversal thermal
conductivities
as well as the mechanical properties (flexural strength) for samples including
20% of ground
expanded graphite powder as compared to particular embodiments of ground
expanded
graphite agglomerates in PPH.
[0027] The samples used for the thermal conductivity measurements shown in
Figures 3a
and 3b, 5, 8a and 8b were prepared using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder
with a side
- 6 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
feeder. The ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the samples were produced
using
ground expanded graphite having substantially the same particle size. The
extruded strands
were chopped after cooling in water and injection moulded to make standard
tensile strength
specimens. Samples for thermal conductivity measurements were cut from the
tensile
strength specimen and measured using a Netzsch TCT 416 instrument.
[0028] Figure 9 shows cross-section images of broken PPH/ground expanded
graphite
agglomerate samples after tensile strength tests for three samples with
particular
embodiments of agglomerates having different tap densities. The images show
that at high
tap density, the agglomerates are not well dispersed in the PPH.
[0029] Figure 10 shows the results of strain at break measurements for samples
including
10% of particular embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates (with
different tap
densities) in PPH. The ground expanded graphite agglomerates of both samples
were
produced using ground expanded graphite having substantially the same particle
size (d90 =
53 pm).
[0030] Figure 11 depicts results of impact strength measurements for samples
including
20% of particular embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates
produced using
ground expanded graphite having different particle sizes in PPH. The tap
densities of the
ground expanded graphite agglomerates were similar (0.14-0.18 g/cm3)
[0031] Figure 12 shows a graphical comparison between the amount of particular
embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates and compacted expanded
graphite
particles larger than 250 pm measured by soft vibrating sieving in accordance
with DIN
51938.
[0032] Figure 13 shows a graphical comparison between the results of
particular
embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates and compacted expanded
graphite
particles in terms of their hardness determined by mechanical water flushing
sieving in
accordance with EN ISO 787-18:1983.
[0033] Figure 14 illustrates the degree of dispersion in the polymer by virtue
of a filter die
test apparatus according to DIN EN13900-5. Ground expanded graphite
agglomerates with
<0.4% of hard particles (GEGA Sample 1) and ground expanded graphite
agglomerates with
8% of hard granules (GEGA Sample 2) were compounded in PP (Sabic 576P) at 5%
loading
and extruded during 15 minutes with a filter mesh size of 150 pm.
- 7 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
[0034] Figures 15 to 19 show various setups and devices for preparing
particular
embodiments of ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
.. Ground Expanded Graphite Agglomerates
[0035] Ground expanded graphite agglomerates (i.e., granulated or granular
ground
expanded graphite, also referred to herein as "graphite agglomerates,"
"agglomerates," or
"granules") have been developed for use as a thermally and/or electrically
conductive
additive. Such agglomerates inter alia exhibit improved handling and
feedability properties
as compared to conventional expanded graphite, particularly when the additive
is blended
into a polymer, in compounders (e.g., twin-screw extruder compounders), to
yield composite
materials having excellent thermal and electrical conductivity as well as
favourable
mechanical properties (e.g., see Figures 2a and 2b, demonstrating advantageous
feedability
into extruders). The improved processing properties are provided by producing
the ground
expanded graphite agglomerates with an adjustable tap density such that the
ground
expanded graphite agglomerates are soft, medium hardness, or hard flakes that
are free-
flowing during their feeding into compounders and extruders.
[0036] Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is believed that
certain
embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the present
invention exhibit
less dusting, better feedability, and better dispersion when added to matrix
materials (e.g.,
polymers) due to the agglomerates having a low granule resistance such that
they
substantially or completely dissolve into the polymers upon being acted on by
the shear
stress of a compounder or any other suitable apparatus for facilitating the
addition and
mixing of the agglomerates with the matrix material. The shear stress thus
dissolves the
agglomerates to produce pristine expanded graphite flakes homogenously
distributed in the
polymer (see Figure 2c). As used herein, "pristine expanded graphite flakes"
or "pristine
expanded graphite powder" refers to unagglomerated or substantially
unagglomerated
expanded graphite, for example, ground expanded graphite particles as
described herein
before their compaction to agglomerates.
[0037] In some embodiments, the ground expanded graphite agglomerates have a
tap
density ranging from about 0.08 to about 1.0 g/cm3, preferably from about 0.08
to about 0.6
g/cm3. Though higher tap density (e.g., harder flakes) generally results in
improved
feedability (i.e., the maximum output of the feeder, see again Figure 2a) and
higher overall
- 8 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
productivity, high tap density may have detrimental effects on the mechanical
properties of
the conductive polymer. For example, a higher tap density may result in poor
dispersion of
the expanded graphite in the polymer matrix. Thus, in particular embodiments,
the ground
expanded graphite agglomerates have a medium tap density ranging from about
0.1 to about
0.4 g/cm3, preferably from about 0.12 to about 0.3 g/cm3 and most preferably
from about 0.15
to about 0.25 g/cm3 for an improved ratio between feedability and dispersion
in the polymer.
[0038] It will be appreciated that in practice the ground expanded graphite
might not be
agglomerated in its entirety, i.e. the ground expanded graphite agglomerate
product will
typically contain a certain amount of non-agglomerated ("unagglomerated")
particles,
especially if the product is not subjected to a final sieving step which may
be capable of
removing smaller, non-agglomerated particles from the obtained product.
[0039] In certain embodiments, the ground expanded graphite particles forming
the
agglomerates have a mean particle size (d50), measured by laser diffraction,
ranging from
about 5 pm to about 500 pm, preferably from about 20 pm to about 200 pm and
most
preferably from about 30 pm to about 100 pm. In some embodiments, the d90
particle size,
measured by laser diffraction, of the ground expanded graphite ranges from
about 10 pm to
about 1200 pm. In other embodiments, the d90 particle size of the ground
expanded graphite
ranges from about 30 pm to about 200 pm.
[0040] In terms of particle size and distribution, certain embodiments of the
ground
expanded graphite agglomerates can be defined by a characteristic particle
size distribution
as determined by soft vibrating sieving according to DIN 51938. For example,
certain
embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the present
invention are
preferably characterized by a size distribution wherein in the analysis
according to DIN
51938 from about 10 to about 80 wt% are retained on a 250 pm sieve, or from
about 10 to
about 60 wt% are retained on a 500 pm sieve, or from about 10 to about 30 wt%
are retained
on the 1 mm sieve, or less than about 5 wt% are retained on a 2 mm sieve.
[0041] Certain embodiments of the graphite agglomerates of the present
invention have
granules with a size ranging from about 100 pm to about 10 mm and preferably
from about
200 pm to about 4 mm. In certain embodiments, the granule size of the
agglomerates of the
invention ranges from about 250 pm to about 1000 pm. Of course, depending on
the
circumstances, agglomerates with a different size may also be produced. In
general, the
agglomerate size and density of the agglomerates can be adjusted by varying
certain
process parameters during the compaction / granulation according to certain
embodiments of
the methods of the present invention as explained in more detail below.
- 9 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
[0042] In particular embodiments, the graphite agglomerates of the present
invention have
at least about 10 wt% of the agglomerates above a 250 pm Mesh sieve after soft
vibrating
sieving, preferably at least about 25 wt% of the agglomerates above a 250 pm
Mesh sieve
after soft vibrating sieving, and most preferably at least about 40 wt% of the
agglomerates
above a 250 pm Mesh sieve after soft vibrating sieving according to DIN 51938
(see Figure
12).
[0043] Some embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates are
characterized by a specific BET surface area ranging from about 8 m2/g to
about 200 m2/g,
and preferably from about 12 m2/g to about 100 m2/g, and most preferably from
about 15
m2/g to about 50 m2/g. In still other embodiments, the ground expanded
graphite
agglomerates have a specific BET surface area ranging from about 20 m2/g to
about 30 m2/g.
[0044] Certain embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the
present
invention are characterized by a particle hardness / softness which allows at
least a
substantial, but in most cases almost complete, deagglomeration during the
processing of
the agglomerates when preparing certain embodiments of the conductive polymers
of the
present invention. In other words, the agglomerates will "dissolve" to a large
extent, or
completely, into pristine expanded graphite particles once mixed into the
composite polymer
material.
[0045] Thus, in certain embodiments, it is preferred that the particle
softness of the
agglomerates is adjusted such that at least about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%,
60%,
70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 98% of the agglomerates are dissolved into particles
with a mean
particle size (d50) of < 250 pm during or after the feeding of the
agglomerates into a
composite material such as a polymer. It will be appreciated that once the
graphite
agglomerates are blended into the, e.g., polymer, the particle size is more
difficult to
determine by conventional particle size measurement methods. However, the
particles can,
for example, be visualized by suitable techniques such as Laserscan or SEM
imaging. Such
techniques allow the determination of the particle size and distribution of
the expanded
graphite particles in the polymer at least in a semi-quantitative manner, as
illustrated in
Figure 2c.
[0046] Another way to determine the degree of dispersion in the polymer is by
using a filter
die test apparatus according to DIN EN13900-5, wherein the apparatus consists
of a head
with an additional pressure sensor and a filter holder that can be added to a
twin screw
extruder. Ground expanded graphite agglomerates with <0.4% of "hard granules",
i.e.
granules left on the sieve after the mechanical water flushing test as
described herein below
- 10-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
(GEGA Sample 1) and ground expanded graphite agglomerates with 8% of "hard
granules"
(GEGA Sample 2) have been compounded in PP (Sabic 576P) at 5% loading and
extruded
during 15 minutes with a filter mesh size of 150 pm. From the pressure vs.
time graph shown
in Figure 14, it is evident that the hard particles present in GEGA Sample 2
do not disperse
well during extrusion, thus leading to a high pressure, whereas GEGA Sample 1
with a low
amount of hard granules doesn't lead to a significant increase of pressure in
the filter. This
indicates that the soft granules are easily dispersed in the polymer by the
shear forces in
twin-screw equipments, whereas the hard granules don't disperse well during
twin-screw
compounding.
[0047] In some embodiments, the particle hardness increases with increasing
tap density. It
has been found that for certain polymers and under particular process
conditions, a tap
density above about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3 will no longer lead to a
sufficient
deagglomeration in the polymer, with the consequence that the expanded
graphite
distribution in the composite polymer is no longer homogenous, i.e. it results
in low
deagglomeration and poor dispersion of the ground expanded graphite
agglomerates in the
polymer, thereby forming large graphite agglomerate masses. Such embodiments
have
lower elongation at break (i.e., a decrease in strain at break). In certain
embodiments, the
tap density of the agglomerates are adjusted to not exceed about 0.3 g/cm3 or
even about
0.25 g/cm3, although it will be appreciated that the maximum tolerated tap
density depends
on the particular application and process parameters applied when producing
the polymer
composite material.
[0048] Thus, in such embodiments, it is preferred that the particle softness
of the
agglomerates is adjusted such that a substantial portion of the agglomerates
are dissolved
into the pristine ground expanded graphite particles during the feeding of the
agglomerates
into a polymer such that the thermal and mechanical properties of the
composite are the
same or similar to composites made with ground expanded graphite.
[0049] Additional embodiments of the graphite agglomerates of the present
invention can,
however, also be defined by other parameters which can be determined by
standard
methods prior to blending the agglomerates into the polymer. One suitable test
for
determining the hardness of the granules is the mechanical water flushing
sieving test
according to EN ISO 787-18:1983 (see Figure 13). In the test apparatus, the
material to be
tested is dispersed in water and brought into centrifugal motion by a system
of rotating jets of
water. The water flushes the fine particles through the sieve, the coarse and
hard particles
being retained on the sieve. The residue on the sieve is dried and weighed.
Using a 250 pm
Mesh size, 10 g of 250 pm graphite agglomerates to be examined, (which were
previously
-11-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
isolated using soft vibrating sieving with a 250 pm Mesh sieve according to
DIN 51938) and
minutes of sieving time, less than about 20% (w/w), preferably less than about
10% (w/w)
or less than about 5% (w/w), and more preferably less than about 2% (w/w) of
the particles
with size >250 pm will be left on the sieve. In preferred embodiments of this
aspect of the
5 invention, the agglomerates have a tap density ranging from about 0.15
g/cm3 to about 0.20
g/cm3 wherein less than about 2%, preferably less than 1% or even less than
0.6% of the
particles remain on the sieve, i.e. have a size of >250 pm as determined in
the mechanical
water flushing sieving test according to EN ISO 787-18:1983.
[0050] Some embodiments of the graphite agglomerates of the present invention
can
10 further be characterized by their maximum output rate in a gravimetric
dosimeter, which is a
parameter reflecting the feedability properties of the agglomerate material
during composite
polymer production. In some embodiments, the maximum output of certain
embodiments of
the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the invention in a Brabender
FlexWall DDW-
MD5-FW40 Plus-50 gravimetric dosimeter (Brabender Technologie KG, Duisburg,
Germany,
http://www.brabender-technologie.com) is at least about 6 kg/h at a tap
density of about
0.125 g/cm3 and at least about 12 kg/h at a tap density of about 0.25 g/cm3.
Preferably, the
maximum output is even higher, such as at least about 8 kg/h at a tap density
of about 0.15
g/cm3 and at least 15 kg/h at a tap density of about 0.25 g/cm3 (see, e.g.,
Figure 2a).
[0051] Particular embodiments of the developed ground expanded graphite
agglomerates
not only possess better handling and higher feedability compared to non-
granular expanded
graphite materials, but also provide improved properties in the conductive
polymers when
compared to conventional graphite additives (see, e.g., Figures 2b, 3h, 4, 6a
and 6b, 7a and
7b). Moreover, in certain embodiments it has been observed that the thermal
and electrical
conductivity conferred by the addition of the expanded graphite material
essentially or
substantially remains the same when the agglomerates as described herein are
added
instead of ground expanded graphite powders in non-compacted form (see, e.g.,
Figures 8a
and 8b).
[0052] In certain embodiments, the graphite agglomerates of the present
invention may
comprise at least one further component in particulate form. A variety of
additives can be
added, alone or in combination, to the ground expanded graphite material,
typically prior to
agglomeration. In some embodiments, additives may be mixed with the ground
expanded
graphite agglomerates before the mixture is added to a composite matrix
material. Among
the additives that can be used for these purposes are for example natural
graphite, synthetic
graphite, carbon black, boron nitride, aluminium nitride, carbon fibers,
carbon nanofibers,
carbon nanotubes, graphene, coke, silver powders, copper powders, aluminium
oxide
- 12 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
powders, steel fibers, PAN, graphite fibers, silicon carbide, graphene, or
combinations
thereof. The ground expanded graphite powder and the additional component can
be mixed
together over a broad range of different weight fractions. For example, the
weight ratio may
range from about 95% : 5% to about 5% : 95%, depending on the purpose of the
resulting
agglomerates and the specific requirements of the intended application.
[0053] In particular embodiments, the ground expanded graphite is mixed with
the other
powders (e.g. natural graphite, synthetic graphite, carbon black, boron
nitride, aluminium
nitride, carbon fibers, carbon nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, graphene, coke,
silver powders,
copper powders, etc.), and the resulting blend is then compacted in order to
obtain
agglomerates containing at least two different components. The advantage of
such blends is
the improvement of some properties of the filled matrix material. For example,
agglomerate
blends with carbon nanotubes, carbon black or fine graphite can improve the
mechanical
properties, while agglomerate blends with graphite can reduce the wear. In
addition,
agglomerate blends with boron nitride allow a polymer which is thermally
conductive to be
electrically insulating.
Methods for Making Ground Expanded Graphite Agglomerates
[0054] The ground expanded graphite agglomerates can be prepared by a variety
of
different processes, some of which will be described herein in more detail. In
particular
embodiments, these processes increase the tap density of the expanded graphite
powder
through the formation of larger agglomerates. At the same time, these
agglomerates may be
soft enough to substantially dissolve once blended into the composite matrix
material, in
order to convey the extraordinary performance of the pristine expanded
graphite to the latter.
In certain embodiments, the granulation process does not substantially change
the specific
BET surface area of the resulting ground expanded graphite agglomerates as
compared to
the expanded graphite powder, which indicates that the process does not result
in partial
destruction of the expanded graphite (i.e., recompaction to graphite by shear
stress).
[0055] Accordingly, in another aspect the present invention provides methods
for producing
the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of the invention which comprise the
step of
compacting ground expanded graphite particles together to form the ground
expanded
graphite agglomerates. For instance, the ground expanded graphite may be
compacted by
dry mechanical compaction. Thus, the developed methods have the advantage of
providing
expanded graphite agglomerates or granules by dry mechanical granulation
without the
addition of additives. By choosing particular compaction parameters, ground
expanded
graphite agglomerates may be created with different tap densities consisting
of soft, medium
or hard flakes, thereby providing the desired properties described herein.
- 13-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
[0056] In some embodiments, the ground expanded graphite agglomerates formed
by this
compaction process may have a tap density ranging from about 0.15 g/cm3 to
about 0.25
g/cm3. In other embodiments, the tap density ranges from about 0.12 g/cm3 to
about 0.3
g/cm3 or from about 0.10 g/cm3 to about 0.4 g/cm3. In certain embodiments, the
size of the
ground expanded graphite agglomerates produced by the methods described herein
ranges
from about 0.1 mm (100 pm) to about 10 mm, although in many cases the size of
the
agglomerates will be from about 200 pm to about 4 mm and preferably from about
250 pm
and about 1000 pm. It will be appreciated that the desired particle size and
size distribution
of the agglomerates can be adjusted or fine-tuned by, for example, an
additional sieving step
after compaction.
[0057] By performing the compacting after the grinding step, it is possible to
optionally mix
the ground expanded graphite with at least one other powder (e.g. natural
graphite, synthetic
graphite, carbon black, boron nitride, aluminium nitride, carbon fibers,
carbon nanofibers,
carbon nanotubes, graphene, coke, silver powders, copper powders, or
combinations
thereof) over a broad range of different weight fractions, and then
subsequently compact the
blend in order to obtain agglomerates containing different powders. The
advantage of such
blends is the potential improvement of certain properties of the composite.
For example,
agglomerate blends with carbon nanotubes, carbon black or fine graphite can
improve the
mechanical properties, while agglomerate blends with additional graphite can
improve the
lubricating properties of the polymer compound. In addition, agglomerate
blends with boron
nitride allow a polymer which is thermally conductive to be electrically
insulating. Weight
ratios can be widely varied and range for example ranging from about 95% : 5%
to about 5%
: 95% (w/w), although it may be possible or even necessary that certain
additives are only
added up to about 5 % (w/w), or even less, such as up to about 4, about 3,
about 2 or about
1 % of the mass of ground expanded graphite. In some embodiments the % weight
ratio
(ground expanded graphite : other powder) is 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40,
50:50, 40:60,
30:70, 20:80, or 10:90.
[0058] The compaction of the ground expanded graphite material can be
accomplished in a
variety of different setups employing equipment generally known and used in
the art for
particulate matters, though not necessarily graphite. In fact, many
publications and patent
documents disclose suitable methods and devices for compacting materials in
powder form,
as described below.
[0059] J.R. Johanson, "A rolling theory for granular solids", Journal of
Applied Mechanics
Series E 32, 842-848, 1965, described a theoretical model developed on roll
compaction that
enables the surface pressure, torque and separating force of the rolls to be
predicted from
- 14 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
the physical characteristics of the powder and the dimensions of the rolls. A.
Fa!zone et al.,
"Effect of Changes in Roller Compactor Parameters on Granulations Produced by
Compaction", Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 18(4), 469-489, 1992,
studied the
influence of compactor parameters, roll speed, horizontal feed speed and
vertical feed speed
on the product characteristics. The authors found that the horizontal feed
speed and the roll
speed have the greatest effects on the changes in the granulation
characteristics.
[0060] Z. Drzymala, "Research into the briquetting process for improved design
of
briquetting machines", Materials & Design 15(1), 33-40, 1993, discusses a
mathematical
model describing a roll compaction process of fine grained materials.
[0061] S.G. von Eggelkraut-Gottanka et al., "Roller Compaction and Tabletting
of St.John's
Wort Plant Dry Extract Using a Gap Width and Force Controlled Roller
Compactor. I.
Granulation and Tabletting of Eight Different Extract Batches", Pharmaceutical
Development
and Technology 7(4), 433-445, 2002, investigated the influence of compacting
parameters
on granule quality of a dry herbal extract. P. Guion and 0. Simon, "Roller
press design -
influence of force feed systems on compaction", Powder Technology 130, 41-48,
2003
describe a variety of different roll press designs and the machine parameters
are discussed
with a focus on identifying the interaction between the machine parameters and
the compact
quality.
[0062] K. Sommer and G. Hauser, "Flow and compression properties of feed
solids for roll-
type presses and extrusion presses", Powder Technology 130, 272-276, 2003,
elaborate on
the theoretical background of roller compression discussing the influence of
the different
parameters on the product properties. L. Grossmann et al., "Empirical Study of
the
Compaction of Cohesive Bulk Solids in a Roll Press", Aufbereitungstechnik
47(6), 22-29,
2006, studied the effect of machine parameters on compaction in a roll press
and examined
parameters were the pressing force and the speed ratio between the feed screw
and the
rolls.
[0063] The review article of Y. Teng et al., "Systematical approach of
formulation and
process development using roller compaction", European Journal of
Pharmaceutics and
Biopharmaceutics 73, 219-229, 2009, focused on roller compaction of drugs.
Relevant
parameters were identified as compaction force, roll speed, and feeder screw
speed. In G.
Reynolds et al., "Practical application of roller compaction process
modeling", Computers
and Chemical Engineering 34, 1049-1057, 2010, the authors demonstrated the
influence of
the different machine parameters, roll gap, roll speed, roll pressure, screw
speed on the
granulate density, and the difference between the model and the observed data.
- 15-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
[0064] EP 0 310 980 B1 (K. Wernecke et al., Alexanderwerk AG (DE)) describes a
process
using a roll press for producing lumpy compacted material from finely disperse
flue gas
gypsum. Similarly, EP 1 230 004 (A. Eggert, Alexanderwerk AG (DE)) relates to
a
compacting system for bulk material which is supplied to a roller press via a
feed screw. This
system is also an embodiment for producing the compacted graphite agglomerate
materials
of certain embodiments of the present invention.
[0065] Accordingly, there is abundant knowledge in the art about agglomeration
of solid
materials in general, including the parameters influencing the particle
properties such as
particle size, shape and particle hardness. Below a number of exemplary
processes and
apparatuses for making the ground expanded graphite agglomerates are described
in more
detail.
Illustrative Examples for Making Embodiments of the Ground Expanded Graphite
Agglomerates
[0066] In certain embodiments, the compaction step (i.e., agglomeration) can
be
accomplished by a process employing a roller compactor. For example a suitable
device is
the Roller Compactor PP 150, manufactured by Alexanderwerk AG, Remscheid,
Germany.
In this process, the desired tap density is achieved by adjusting the feeding
rate, the roll gap
and the sieve size (see Figures 15 and 16, respectively, for two different
setups). Preferably,
the ground expanded graphite particles are fed with the help of a screw to a
couple of
counter-rotating rolls to yield a pre-agglomerate, followed by a fine
agglomeration step
whereby the pre-agglomerates are pushed through a sieve which assists in
defining the
desired agglomerate size.
[0067] In alternate embodiments, the agglomeration is accomplished by a
process
employing a flat die pelletizer, described for example in DE-OS-343 27 80 Al.
In this
process the tap density is adjusted by the gap between the rolls, the die and
die size, and the
speed of the rotating knives. Preferably, the ground expanded graphite
particles are pressed
through a die by pan grinder rolls, followed by cutting the pre-agglomerated
graphite particles
to the desired size with suitable means such as rotating knives (see Figure
17).
[0068] In yet another alternative process embodiment, the agglomeration is
achieved by a
process employing a pin mixer pelletizer or a rotary drum pelletizer (cf.
Figure 18). Several
patents describe these pelletizer systems for the agglomeration of different
types of powders,
for example US 3,894,882, US 5,030,433, and EP 0 223 963 B1. In these process
variants,
the tap density is adjusted by the feeding rate, the moisture content, the
choice and
concentration of the additives and the pin shaft or drum rotating speed,
respectively.
- 16 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
[0069] In yet another alternative embodiment of the method the agglomeration
is
accomplished by a fluidized bed process, by a spray dryer process or by a
fluidized bed
spray dryer process (cf. Figure 19).
[0070] A fluidized bed process to prepare certain embodiments of the
agglomerates of the
present invention may be carried out using the apparatuses described (for the
agglomeration/granulation of different powders) in several patents such as DE
199 04 657
Al and DE 100 14 749 B4. A suitable spray dryer process may utilize the
apparatus
described (again for the granulation of different powders) in CH 359 662, US
7,449,030 B2,
EP 0 469 725 B1 and JP 4113746 B2. Finally, EP 1 227 732 B1, EP 0 729 383 81
and WO
01/03807 Al for example describe (for the granulation of different powders,
not graphite) a
suitable fluidized bed spray dryer that may be employed in the agglomeration
processes
disclosed herein.
[0071] Exemplary processes are described in more detail in the Example section
below.
[0072] In some embodiments of this aspect of the invention the method for
preparing
particular embodiments of the agglomerates of the invention further comprises
the grinding of
an expanded graphite material in order to form ground expanded graphite
particles which
can subsequently be used in the compaction / agglomeration step. Such
embodiments of the
method start with the provision of expanded graphite which is then ground or
milled to the
desired particle size distribution.
[0073] In certain embodiments, the expanded graphite may be air milled,
autogenously
milled, or mechanically milled. In particular embodiments, the grinding of the
expanded
graphite delaminates at least a portion of the expanded graphite or destroys
the vermicular
morphology of the expanded graphite, or a combination thereof. In some
embodiments, the
expanded graphite may be ground to have a mean particle size (d50) ranging
from about 5
pm to about 500 pm, though in many cases the d50 will range from about 20 pm
to about 200
pm or even range from about 30 pm and about 100 pm or about 20 pm to about 50
pm. In
some embodiments, the d90 particle size of the ground expanded graphite ranges
from about
10 pm to about 1200 pm. In other embodiments, the d90 particle size of the
ground
expanded graphite ranges from about 20 pm to about 500 pm or from 30 pm to
about 200
pm.
[0074] In other embodiments of this aspect of the invention, the method
further comprises
the preparation of the expanded graphite from natural or synthetic graphite
materials by any
suitable method known in the art. For instance, natural purified graphite
flakes are treated,
optionally by vacuum impregnation, for example with mixtures of acid (like for
example
- 17-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
H2SO4 or HNO3) and an oxidation agent (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, H202, or an
ammonium
sulfate compound such as ammonium peroxodisulfate, NH4S208 or potassium
permanganate, KMn04), until these compounds become soaked between the graphite
layers
and become intercalated within the graphite sheets of the graphite crystal
structure. After
filtering and washing the intercalated graphite, the acid-treated graphite is
heated at
temperatures above the decomposition temperature of the intercalated
compounds, which is
generally at temperatures above about 600 to about 700 C, and preferably at
about 1000 C,
under inert or reducing gas atmosphere, to obtain the expanded or exfoliated
graphite
material.
[0075] In some embodiments, a thermally expanded graphite in its vermicular
form is used.
The expressions "thermally expanded graphite in its vermicular form" or
"vermicular
expanded graphite" as used herein, refers to the expanded graphite form as
obtained directly
after thermal expansion in a vermicular form morphology. In particular, it
means that the
vermicular expanded graphite is in its native form as obtained directly after
thermal
expansion. Thermally expanded graphite, as expanded sufficiently in its
crystalline c-axis, of
its initial z-dimension, has a vermicular morphology, i.e. an accordion-like
or worm-like
structure.
[0076] It should be mentioned that neither particle size nor the particle
shape indicate the
presence of graphite in a vermicular morphology. It is the texture of the
expanded graphite
which clearly identifies the vermicular morphology. The determination of the
particle size
distribution by laser diffraction in the case of highly anisotropic materials
like expanded
vermicular graphite leads to high deviations from the real particle sizes
since the method is
based on spherical-shaped particle. The vermicular form of expanded graphite
can be
identified by the degree of expansion of the raw graphite material in the
crystallographic c-
direction which is perpendicular to the graphene layers. The thermal expansion
results in a
significant increase of the z-dimension of the graphite particle which is
perpendicular to the
graphite particle plane. Usually this expansion in the crystallographic c-
direction giving the
accordion-like morphology of the vermicular form causes a significant decrease
of the tap
density as well as a significant increase of the specific BET surface area.
[0077] In some embodiments, the initial particle expansion degree to form the
vermicular
morphology may be at least 80 times of the z-dimension of the non-expanded
graphite flake.
In other embodiments, the initial expansion degree of the expanded graphite
flake in z-
direction is within the range of 200 to 500 times of its initial z-dimension.
- 18-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
Additives for Composite Materials Such As Conductive Polymers
Ground Expanded Graphite Agglomerate Additive
[0078] The ground expanded graphite agglomerates as described herein may be
used as
an additive for producing composites such as conductive polymers, ceramics,
mineral
materials, or building materials. Conductive polymers including ground
expanded graphite
agglomerates can be produced with less feedability problems (i.e., yielding
high productivity)
and with suitable thermal and electrical conductivities for a variety of
applications.
Compacted Expanded Graphite Particle Additive
[0079] In alternate embodiments, additives for preparing conductive polymers
are provided
which contain compacted expanded graphite particles.
[0080] The compacted expanded graphite particles of the conductive polymer
additive may
be prepared by providing expanded graphite, compacting or moulding the
expanded graphite
into a macroscale article (e.g., an expanded graphite foil as known in the
art), and then
grinding, chopping, or milling the molded expanded graphite article into
particles of
compacted expanded graphite.
[0081] Hence, the difference between such "compacted expanded graphite
particles" and
"ground expanded graphite agglomerates" is not only manifested in the
different tap density
(usually larger for "compacted expanded graphite particles") but also in the
hardness of the
two materials, with the "ground expanded graphite agglomerates" being softer.
[0082] The amount of each material that is larger than 250 pm can be
determined by soft
vibrating sieving according to DIN 51938 (cf. Figure 12): the material
obtained by grinding a
foil of expanded graphite mostly consists of material larger than 250 pm,
whereas material
obtained by compaction of ground expanded graphite has a lower amount of
agglomerates
larger than 250 pm (though generally increasing with increasing tap density).
In some
embodiments, mechanical water flushing sieving of ground expanded graphite
agglomerates
(which have a size larger than 250 pm as obtained by the soft vibrating
sieving) results in
less than about 5 wt% of the agglomerates being retained on a 250 pm sieve,
indicating the
softness of the granular graphite "dissolving" into smaller particles in this
test. In contrast, for
some embodiments of the compacted expanded graphite particles subjected to the
mechanical water flushing sieving (i.e., chopped foils having a size larger
than 250 pm as
obtained by the soft vibrating sieving) more than about 80 wt% are retained on
the 250 pm
sieve, due to their hardness. Generally, the size of the compacted expanded
graphite
- 19-

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
particles is similar to the one observed for the graphite agglomerates of the
present
invention. Thus, the size of the particles may range from about 0.1 mm (100
pm) to about 10
mm, although in most cases the size of the agglomerates will be from about 200
pm to about
4 mm or from about 250 pm to about 1000 pm.
Composite Materials
[0083] The present invention also provides composite materials comprising
certain
embodiments of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates or the conductive
polymer
additives as described herein.
[0084] In some embodiments, the composite includes a matrix material
comprising a
polymeric material, a ceramic material, a mineral material, a wax, or a
building material. In
particular embodiments, these composites may be used in preparing thermally
and/or
electrically conductive materials. Exemplary materials comprise, for example,
LED lighting
materials, solar panels, electronics (which aid in heat dissipation) or
geothermic hoses, floor
heating wherein the conductive polymer acts as a heat exchanger, in heat
exchangers in
.. general (e.g., for automotive applications), thermal storage systems based
on salts (e.g.,
phase-change materials or low melting salts), thermally conductive ceramics,
friction
materials for brake pads, cement, gypsum, or clay (e.g., brick for
construction), thermostats,
graphite bipolar plates, or carbon brushes. Suitable polymeric materials for
use in conductive
polymers include, for example, a polyolefin (e.g., polyethylene such as LOPE,
LLDPE,
VLDPE, HOPE, polypropylene such as homopolymer (PPH) or copolymers, PVC, or
PS), a
polyamide (e.g., PA6, PA6,6; PA12; PA6,10; PA11, aromatic polyamides), a
polyester (e.g.,
PET, PBT, PC), an acrylic or acetate (e.g., ABS, SAN, PMMA, EVA), a polyimide,
a
thio/ether polymer (e.g., PPO, PPS, PES, PEEK), an elastomer (natural or
synthetic rubber),
a thermoplastic elastomer (e.g.: TPE, TPO), thermosetting resins (e.g.,
phenolic resins or
epoxy resins), copolymers thereof, or mixtures of any of the foregoing
materials.
[0085] The loading ratio of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates in
general may
vary widely, depending on the desired target value for the thermal
conductivity and the
requirements in terms of the mechanical stability of the composite polymer. In
some
embodiments, good results have already been achieved with additions of about 3
to about 5
% (w/w), although in most applications the weight ratio of the added graphite
may be a little
higher, such as about 10, about 15, about 20, about 25 or about 30 c/o (w/w).
However, it is
not excluded that in other embodiments the conductive polymers contain even
more than
about 30% of the expanded graphite, such as about 40, about 50, about 60 or
even about
70% (w/w). In some embodiments of conductive polymer composites, like carbon
brushes or
- 20 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
bipolar plates, even about 80% (w/w) or about 90 % (w/w) loading of the
graphite
agglomerates is used.
[0086] In any event, should electrical conductivity of the polymer also be
desired, the
concentration of the graphite in the final polymer may be adjusted to exceed
the so-called
percolation threshold ratio, above which the resistivity of the polymer
typically decreases
exponentially. On the other hand, it should be taken into account that the
melt flow index of
the composite material strongly decreases with increasing graphite content in
the polymer.
Thus, the graphite content in the composite polymer blend also depends on the
maximal
viscosity tolerated in the moulding process. The melt flow index may be,
however, also
dependent on the choice of the polymer type.
[0087] In certain embodiments, the ground expanded graphite agglomerates of
the present
invention may for instance be used as a thermally conductive additive in a
polypropylene
homopolymer (PPH), as shown in Figure 3a. The low thermal conductivity of pure
("virgin")
PPH (about 0.4 W/m*K) can be increased by one order of magnitude at a
relatively low filling
level (about 3.5 W/m*K) at about 20% (w/w) loading with the ground expanded
graphite
agglomerates. The transversal thermal conductivity is about the half of the
longitudinal
thermal conductivity. These results indicate that the anisotropy of the
expanded graphite
particles is manifested in the final compound, due to their alignment during
the injection
moulding process. This property should be taken into account when designing
materials
employing certain embodiments of the conductive polymers described herein and
can even
be used to fine tune the final thermal conductivity. Of course, the thermal
conductivity
strongly depends not only on the sample orientation (direction) during the
measurement, but
also on the type of polymer, the sample history (type and conditions of
compounding and
processing) and the measurement method.
[0088] Notably, the improved feedability and handling of the ground expanded
graphite
agglomerates may be achieved without sacrificing the thermal performance of
the expanded
graphite as well as the mechanical properties of the polymer compound ¨ i.e.
the thermal
conductivity obtained for the polymer blend is essentially or substantially
identical, regardless
of whether a graphite powder or agglomerated ground expanded graphite is used.
As shown
in Figures 8a and 8b, the thermal conductivity and the mechanical properties
of polymer
blends containing 20% (w/w) of ground expanded graphite and ground expanded
graphite
agglomerates is indeed comparable.
[0089] With regard to the mechanical properties of the conductive polymer, it
has been
observed that in some cases, the conductive polymer's elastic modulus, tensile
and bending
- 21 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
strength increase as the concentration of ground expanded graphite
agglomerates increases.
In other cases, the conductive polymer's strain at break and impact strength
decrease as the
concentration of ground expanded graphite agglomerates increases. In
still other
embodiments, the conductive polymer's E-modulus and strain at break decrease
with an
increase in the tap density of the ground expanded graphite. For instance, if
the compacted
expanded graphite agglomerates are too hard, they cannot dissolve completely
in the
polymer and may adversely affect the polymer's mechanical and/or conductive
properties
(see Figures 9 and 10).
[0090] In other embodiments, the impact strength increases with a decrease in
the particle
size distribution of the pristine expanded graphite, thus providing stronger
mechanical
properties in the conductive polymer (cf. Figure 11).
[0091] Since ground expanded graphite agglomerates enable a targeted value of
thermal
conductivity to be reached at a lower loading compared to non-expanded
graphite, it enables
maintaining fairly good mechanical and rheological properties of the composite
polymer.
Method for Preparing Conductive Polymers
[0092] The present invention also provides a method for making certain
embodiments of
the conductive polymers of the present invention. The method comprises feeding
the ground
expanded graphite agglomerates or the conductive polymer additive as described
herein to a
compounding machine (such as a twin-screw extruder, a single-screw extruder, a
co-
kneader, an internal mixer or long continuous mixers), thereby mixing the
polymer and
agglomerates, followed by a moulding process (e.g., injection moulding,
compression
moulding, injection compression moulding, extrusion, film blowing,
thermoforming, casting,
extrusion blow moulding, injection blow moulding, spinning, RIM, RTM,
pultrusion, induction,
emulsion, transfer injection, rotating blow moulding, transfer moulding,
injection transfer
moulding, calendaring or foaming) of the resulting conductive polymer into the
desired form.
Uses of the Conductive Polymers
[0093] Finally, the present invention also relates to the use of particular
embodiments of the
conductive polymers of the present invention in preparing thermally and/or
electrically
conductive polymer materials. Exemplary materials comprise, for example, LED
lighting
materials, solar panels, electronics (aiding in heat dissipation and for
covers), geothermic
hoses, generally where the conductive polymer acts as a heat exchanger (e.g.,
floor heating
applications, heat exchangers in automotive applications, heat sinks), gaskets
and thermal
interfaces, encapsulating devices, under-the-hood automotive parts,
encapsulation of
motors, ventilation parts, battery cases for electric vehicles, friction
materials for brake pads
- 22 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
(e.g., based on resins), thermostats, graphite bipolar plates, or carbon
brushes (e.g., based
on polymers such as thermoplastic resins, or thermosetting resins).
[0094] Compared to metal based materials conventionally used for applications
where
thermal conductivity is required, advantages of conductive plastics include
increased
.. freedom in the design of the materials, lighter weight materials, and cost
savings compared
to the normally quite expensive metal based materials.
Measurement Methods
The percentage (%) values specified herein are by weight, unless specified
otherwise.
Specific BET Surface Area
[0095] The method is based on the registration of the absorption isotherm of
liquid nitrogen
in the range p/p0=0.04-0.26, at 77 K. Following the procedure proposed by
Brunauer,
Emmet and Teller (Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1938,
60, 309-319) , the monolayer capacity can be determined. On the basis of the
cross-
sectional area of the nitrogen molecule, the monolayer capacity and the weight
of sample,
the specific surface can then be calculated.
Tap Density
[0096] 100 g of dry graphite powder is carefully poured into a graduated
cylinder.
Subsequently, the cylinder is fixed on the off-centre shaft-based tapping
machine and 1500
strokes are run. The reading of the volume is taken and the tap density is
calculated.
Reference: -DIN-ISO 787-11
Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction
[0097] The presence of particles within a coherent light beam causes
diffraction. The
.. dimensions of the diffraction pattern are correlated with the particle
size. A parallel beam
from a low-power laser lights up a cell which contains the sample suspended in
water. The
beam leaving the cell is focused by an optical system. The distribution of the
light energy in
the focal plane of the system is then analyzed. The electrical signals
provided by the optical
detectors are transformed into particle size distribution by means of a
calculator. A small
.. sample of graphite is mixed with a few drops of wetting agent and a small
amount of water.
- 23 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
The sample prepared in the described manner is introduced in the storage
vessel of the
apparatus and measured.
References: -ISO 13320-1 /-ISO 14887
Particle size distribution by soft vibration sieving
[0098] In general, a set of circular sieves with descending mesh size is
assembled and
fixed on a vibration machine. 50 g of dry powder is poured onto the top (=
lowest mesh No.)
screen. The set is vibrated for a certain time and the residue on the screens
and in the
bottom pan is weighed and particle size distribution is calculated. For the
determination of
the particle size of the agglomerates of the present invention by soft
vibration sieving, an
analytical sieve shaker Retsch A5200 with one 250 pm sieve (60 mesh) was
used. The
settings were 1.03 of amplitude, duration 5 min, a break (called interval)
every 13 seconds,
and each test was carried out with 50 g of ground expanded graphite
agglomerates.
References: DIN 51938
Mechanical water flushing sieving
[0099] In the test method, in accordance with DIN EN ISO 787-18:1983, 10 g of
the
agglomerates (residue on the 250 pm sieve from soft vibrating sieving)
dispersed in water
are brought into circular movement by a water jet (with a pressure of 300 20
kPa) rotor
which is situated inside the vessel. The fine materials are separated from the
coarse material
by the water and the fine particles are flushed through a sieve for at least
10 minutes in order
to break the agglomerates. The sieve residue is dried at 105 2 C for 1 h, the
sieve is cooled
in an exsiccator and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Thermal Conductivity
[00100] Several thermoanalytical methods allow the measurement of the thermal
conductivity of a sample (solid, liquid or powder) as a function of
temperature. Measurements
can for example be carried out with a Netzsch TCT 416 thermal analysis
instrument (Sample
size: up to 5 x 5 x 35mm, measuring range: 0.5 ¨ 250 W/mK).
[00101] The thermal conductivity tester Netzsch TCT 416 is designed to measure
the
thermal conductivity of solids in the range of A = 0.5 to 250 W=m-1=K-1 with
an accuracy of
5%. Therefore, plastics with low conductivity, as well as highly conductive
materials like
graphites, metals and alloys may be tested with the Netzsch TCT 416. Thermal
conductivity
- 24 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
measurements may be carried out in the temperature range between 30 to 60 C
(mean test
piece temperature).
[00102] The testing involves the following steps: Heat is fed to the lower
front side of a rod
shaped test piece via a heat block (TH). The rod-shaped test piece is
surrounded by a
constant temperature Tu (Tu < TH). In general the heater block is set at a
temperature TH of
60 C and the surrounding block at 25 C (Tu). The heat transfer to and from the
test piece is
assured by a conductive paste and by a load applied to the test piece (usually
25 N). When
the equilibrium is reached (typically after 5-10 min for A> 100 Wm-1.K-1 and
15-20 min for A -
20 Wm-1.K-1), the temperature T2 of the lower end surface of rod shape of the
test piece and
the temperature T1 of the upper end surface of the rod shape of the are
measured by two
thermocouples (type K, NiCr-Ni). The thermal conductivity (TC) may be
calculated from the
temperature T1 and T2, which depend both on the thermal conductivity of the
test material
and on the heat transfer coefficient between the test piece and its
surroundings. The
measured temperatures depend also on the geometric dimensions of the test
piece. This
test may be used on rods with circular cross section of 6 mm or with squared
cross section of
5x5 mm. The length of the test piece depends on the TO of the material: 35 mm
for A > 5
Wm-1.K-1 and 20 mm for A < 5 Wm-1.K-1. The end surfaces should be parallel and

perpendicular to the sides as well as very smooth in order to provide good
heat transfer.
Deviations in the dimensions of 0.3 mm are acceptable before recalibration is
necessary.
[00103] Measurement: The two thermostats are switched on 2 hours before
starting the
measurement (TH = 60 C, Tu = 25 C) in order to reach a steady state
(difference in the
temperatures below 0.1 C). The measurement is carried out twice with the
sample being
overturned between the two measurements. The thermal conductivity is the
median of the
two values.
[00104] Calibration: The calibration of the TOT 416 is carried out on four
different reference
test pieces (see Table 1) with the two different lengths (20 and 35 mm) in
order to determine
the calibration factors. For every reference test piece the measurement is
repeated three
times and the median is used for the calibration. The calibration is repeated
every year or
after 20 measurements.
Table 1: Characteristic data of reference materials
Material A DArrn-14,0 Temperature [ C]
Duralluminium 129 2.5 57
Brass 102 2.0 56.5
Steel 1.4104 (magnetic) 21.8 + 0.5 51
- 25 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
Steel 1.4301 14.2 0.3 48
[00105] Alternatively, thermal conductivity of the polymers is determined by a
guarded heat
flow meter method (ASTM E 1530), for example in an Anter QuicklineTm-10
instrument
(sample size: disc 050mm, up to 30 mm thickness, measuring range: 0.1 ¨20
W/mK).
[00106] Thermal conductivity of the polymers can also be determined by
Laserflash method
(ASTM E-1461), for example in an LFA447 instrument from Netzsch.
Izod impact strength
[00107] The determination of unnotched Izod impact strength was measured in
accordance
with ISO 180:1993(E), using a using a Ceast 6545 Impact Tester, fitted with
various
pendulums of different energies (1, 2.75 and 5 J). The absorbed energy (J),
impact strength
(kJ/m2) and impact strength (J/m) of ten samples from each of the supplied
specimens was
measured. The absorbed energy (VV) should be between 10% and 80% of the
pendulum
energy (E), otherwise the pendulum must be changed. Always use a pendulum
having the
highest energy if possible.
Strain at break
[00108] The determination of the tensile properties of the supplied samples
was measured in
accordance with BS 2782: Part 3: Method 320B, using a Tinius Olsen H1OKS
tensometer
fitted with a 10KN load cell. The stress at yield (MPa), stress at break (MPa)
and strain at
break (c)/0) of ten samples of each of the supplied specimens (type 1 test
piece) were
measured at a separation rate of 50 mm/min. Elongation was measured using a
mechanical
extensometer set to a gauge length of 70 mm.
[00109] It will be apparent to those of skill in the art that many
modifications and slight
variations are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the
present invention.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of
illustration
only, with reference to the following examples.
EXAMPLES
Example I - Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
[00110] In order to prepare the ground expanded graphite agglomerates, the raw
ground
expanded graphite is fed to a couple of counter-rotating rolls with the help
of a screw. By
- 26 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
passing through the rolls the expanded graphite is pre-agglomerated. In this
example, rolls
having a smooth surface is employed (although the rolls can also have a
structured surface
in order to improve the production rate). In a second step, the fine
agglomeration step, the
pre-agglomerated expanded graphite is pushed with the help of rotating cleats
through a final
sieve or set of sieves which assist in defining the agglomerate size of the
ground expanded
graphite (see Figure 15). The desired tap density is adjusted by the
appropriate choice of
the screw speed, the gap between the rolls, and the sieve size, producing the
desired soft
agglomerates of ground expanded graphite (Roller Compactor PP 150,
manufactured by
Alexanderwerk AG, Remscheid, Germany).
[00111] The influence of the roll gap parameter on the product characteristics
(tap density,
size distribution by vibrating sieve and water sieving as well as the BET
surface area of the
obtained agglomerates) is illustrated in the following table:
TABLE 2: Influence of roll gap on product characteristics
Roller Compactor Machine Parameter Material
Parameter
feeding roll vibrating water
roll gap sieve size tap density
BET
rate pressure sieve sieving
[rpm] [mm] [kN/cm] [mm] [g/cm3] >250 pm [%]
>250 pm
[ 70] [m2/g]
Material 1 8 0.15 5 2.5 0.35 83 18 22
Material 2 8 0.25 5 2.5 0.22 50 0.06
20
Material 3 8 0.35 5 2.5 0.16 48 0.01 22
Example 2 ¨ Alternative Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
[00112] In an alternative setup, agglomerates of ground expanded graphite is
made with a
machine having a different geometrical arrangement. In this setup, the raw
material is fed
vertically to the counter-rotating rolls with the help of a vertical screw, as
shown in Figure 16
(Powtec RC210, manufactured by Powtec Maschinen und Engineering GmbH,
Remscheid,
Germany). The tap density is again adjusted through the screw speed, the roll
gap and the
final sieve size.
Example 3 ¨ Alternative Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
Pin Mixer Pelletizing Process
[00113] In an alternative process, the agglomerates may be produced with a pin
mixer
pelletizer system as generally known in the art. Such pin mixer pelletizer
systems are widely
used, e.g., for agglomerating carbon black powders. The pin mixer consists of
a cylindrical
stationary shell with a rotating shaft provided with pins. The raw ground
expanded graphite
- 27 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
enters the system at one end of the cylinder and may be whipped by the
rotating pins as it
moves from the inlet, through the shell and to the bottom outlet. A fine spray
of liquid or
vapour may be added at the entry section and distributed throughout the
powder, which
leads to fine mixing and micro-agglomeration of the particles. In this
example, the liquid or
.. the vapour may be water, although in general any inert liquid may work in
this setup. Also,
additives can be added at this stage.
[00114] This method may require a second drying step in order to remove the
moisture from
the ground expanded graphite agglomerates. The bulk density of the
agglomerates can be
adjusted by the feeding rate, the moisture content, the type and amount of
additives added
.. and the pin shaft rotating speed.
Example 4¨ Alternative Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
Rotary Drum Pelletizing Process
[00115] In this process, the agglomeration may be accomplished with a rotary
drum
pelletizer system, which in general is very similar to the pin mixer described
in Example 4.
Here the ground expanded graphite may be charged to the rotating cylinder
equipped with
pins, blades or cones, thereby pushing the material from the inlet of the
drums to the outlet.
A wetting liquid may be sprayed into the cylinder. An additional drying step
may be then
applied in order to remove the moisture from the agglomerates.
[00116] The bulk density of the ground expanded graphite agglomerates may be
adjusted by
the feeding rate, the moisture content, the choice and amount of additives
added and the
drum rotating speed.
Example 5 ¨ Alternative Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
Fluidized Bed Agglomeration Process
[00117] Another alternative process for preparing the ground expanded graphite
agglomerates may employ a fluidized bed chamber, for example as described in
DE 199 04
657 Al or DE 100 14 749 B4. The raw ground expanded graphite may be fed to the

fluidized bed chamber inlet zone. Process air may be fed to all process stages
from beneath
the fluidized bed. Water and a binder may be introduced over the fluidized bed
by spraying
or by a jet stream. All ingredients may be fluidized to form homogenized
granules of ground
expanded graphite.
- 28 -

CA 02807691 2013-02-07
WO 2012/020099 PCT/EP2011/063866
Example 6 ¨ Alternative Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
Spray Dryer Agglomeration Process
[00118] In this process, the ground expanded graphite agglomerates may be
prepared by
spray drying. Spray drying apparatuses for preparing agglomerates of different
powders
have been described in several patents, e.g., CH 359 662, US 7,449,030 B2, EP
0 469 725
B1 and JP 4 113 746 B2.
[00119] A water based dispersion containing the raw ground expanded graphite
particles
and, optionally, a binder may be atomized to form small droplets, and the
liquid is evaporated
by virtue of a gas stream, thereby agglomerating the graphite powder. The
formed
agglomerates may be collected on the bottom of the spray dryer apparatus and
are
subsequently dried in order to remove the remaining moisture.
Example 7 ¨ Alternative Agglomeration Process for Expanded Graphite
Fluidized Bed Spray Dryer Agglomeration Process
[00120] The Fluidised Bed Spray Dryer process to manufacture agglomerated
expanded
graphite consists in the combination of the two processes described above in
Examples 6
and 7. A water based dispersion of raw ground expanded graphite (optionally
containing
additives like a binder) may be atomised as droplets centrally into the upper
part of a drying
chamber where a drying gas may be introduced to partially dry the droplets to
moist particles
and carry them in a downward widening direction to the bottom where a
fluidized particle bed
may be formed by means of an upward stream of fluidizing gas drying,
classifying and
agglomerating the particles therein.
- 29 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2019-02-26
(86) PCT Filing Date 2011-08-11
(87) PCT Publication Date 2012-02-16
(85) National Entry 2013-02-07
Examination Requested 2016-02-26
(45) Issued 2019-02-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $263.14 was received on 2023-08-04


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-08-12 $347.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-08-12 $125.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2013-02-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2013-08-12 $100.00 2013-02-07
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2013-05-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2014-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2014-08-11 $100.00 2014-07-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2015-08-11 $100.00 2015-07-21
Request for Examination $800.00 2016-02-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2016-08-11 $200.00 2016-07-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2017-08-11 $200.00 2017-07-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2018-08-13 $200.00 2018-07-23
Final Fee $300.00 2019-01-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2019-08-12 $200.00 2019-08-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2020-08-11 $200.00 2020-08-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2021-08-11 $255.00 2021-08-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2022-08-11 $254.49 2022-08-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2023-08-11 $263.14 2023-08-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IMERYS GRAPHITE & CARBON SWITZERLAND LTD.
Past Owners on Record
TIMCAL S.A.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2013-02-07 2 69
Claims 2013-02-07 4 151
Drawings 2013-02-07 14 742
Description 2013-02-07 29 1,630
Representative Drawing 2013-02-07 1 4
Cover Page 2013-04-10 2 42
Amendment 2017-06-15 15 603
Description 2017-06-15 30 1,551
Claims 2017-06-15 5 157
Examiner Requisition 2017-09-20 3 216
Office Letter 2018-08-14 1 50
Amendment 2018-03-07 8 223
Claims 2018-03-07 5 158
Final Fee 2019-01-09 1 36
PCT Correspondence 2019-01-09 1 36
Representative Drawing 2019-01-28 1 3
Cover Page 2019-01-28 2 43
PCT 2013-02-07 12 409
Assignment 2013-02-07 2 100
Correspondence 2013-03-13 1 22
Correspondence 2013-05-16 1 25
Assignment 2013-05-16 8 359
Assignment 2014-06-18 11 618
Amendment 2016-09-26 2 47
Request for Examination 2016-02-26 1 33
Examiner Requisition 2016-12-21 6 396