Finance and Administration (Quebec Region) — Client Satisfaction Survey

Branch and Directorate:

The Finance and Administration Directorate has three main objectives. As a quality advisor and partner, the Directorate aims to ensure that its clients are provided with top-quality administrative and financial services; provide clients with advice, training and relevant information concerning finance and administration; and provide citizens with information and answers to their questions about Industry Canada's programs and services.

Rationale:

The Directorate's client satisfaction survey falls within the scope of its service improvement effort and was aimed at all employees of the Quebec Region. It allowed internal clients to assess the quality of services offered by the Directorate. Questions evaluated the clients' satisfaction with all of the services offered, categorized in accordance with the three business areas covered by the Directorate, i.e. Finance, Administration and Client Services.

Anticipated Outcomes/Benefits:

The research findings will help identify areas for improvement. A plan of action will be included in the Finance and Administration business plan for 2007–2008.

Research Information:

All employees in the Quebec region were invited to complete the on line survey, which was conducted from January 4–16, 2007. One hundred and twenty-four employees out of a total of 326 completed the questionnaire.

Contracting:

The research was conducted in-house.


Finance and Administration Survey, January 4-16, 2007 — Results, February 2007


Finance and Administration Survey—January 4-16, 2007
Results—February 2007


Finance and Administration

  • The Finance and Administration Branch has three main objectives: in its capacity as an adviser and partner of choice, it aims to deliver top-quality administrative and financial services to its clients, and provide them with advice, training and information related to administration and finance; and also provide information and answer requests from citizens relating to programs and services offered by Industry Canada.
  • This client satisfaction survey will allow the Finance and Administration Directorate to serve its internal clients better. It offers internal clients an opportunity to evaluate the quality of services as part of the Directorate's mandate and specify how they can be improved. Questions concern all services offered, categorized in accordance with the three business areas covered by the Directorate, i.e. Finance, Adminstration and Client Services.

Methodology

  • The survey was conducted internally and on-line, using PHPESP, Version 1.8.1 which guarantees complete response anonymity. All employees in the Quebec region were asked to complete the questionnaire.
  • The following Directorates participated in the survey: Competition Bureau; Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy; Measurement Canada; Chief Information Office; Regional Executive Director's Office; Planning, Analysis and Communications; Human Resources; Finance and Administration; Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications; Business Development; Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade; Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (Montreal office).
  • The survey was conducted from January 4–16, 2007.

Number of Employees

  • Finance and Administration
    • 15 employees including the director
      • Financial Services and Procurement (6)
      • Administrative Services (4)
      • Client Services (4)
  • Financial assistants within directorates
    • 18 employees

Participation

  • Participation rate: 38%
    • 124 participants
    • Out of a total of 326 employees (Industry Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada)

Breakdown by Group

Bar chart of Breakdown by Group

Geographical Location

Bar chart of Geographical Location

Manager / Employee Representation

Bar chart of Manager / Employee Representation

Level of Satisfaction Related to Financial Services and Procurement

Bar chart of Level of Satisfaction Related to Financial Services and Procurement

Financial Services and Procurement

Bar chart of Financial Services and Procurement

Purchasing and Payment Entry Point

  • 19.4% preferred a single point of entry for purchasing and payments
  • 80.6% preferred one person to be assigned to their directorate for purchasing and payments
  • Comments
    • Respondents preferred to have one person familiar with their needs on site
    • For some types of purchasing, a single entry point (specialization, temporary replacement, group purchases) is better

Financial Services and Procurement
Comments—Areas Requiring Improvement

  • Contracts
    • Complexity—new directives
    • Lack of information and training
    • Role of partner and counsellor should be clarified
    • Response time too long
    • Limited number of individuals with expertise
  • Budget Planning
    • Financial assistants require training
    • More wide-ranging support required
    • Reports are poorly understood and improperly used
    • Information required to make decisions not always available

Financial Services and Procurement: Plan of Action

  • Contracts
    • Review work organization
    • Train specialists
    • Review resources dedicated to these services in accordance with demand
    • Explore possibility of using services provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada
  • Budget Planning
    • Consult managers to learn their needs
    • Review responsibilities of financial assistants vs. financial officers
    • Train finance personnel
  • Information Provided to Employees
    • Expanded network
    • Review communication methods (Newletters—Questions and answers)

Level of Satisfaction Related to Administrative Services

Bar chart of Level of Satisfaction Related to Administrative Services

Administrative Services

Bar chart of Administrative Services

Administrative Services
Comments—Areas Requiring Improvement

  • Inventory maintenance too complex
  • Lack of information on services offered by administration
  • Too few meetings with ergonomic services

Administrative Services: Plan of Action

  • Draw up a table of responsibilities pertaining to each employee (posted on intranet)
  • Review procedures (posted on intranet)
    • Example: ergonomics, mail, access cards, etc.
  • Assist directorates with inventory

Level of Satisfaction Related to Client Services

Bar chart of Level of Satisfaction Related to Client Services

Client Services

Bar chart of Client Services

Client Services
Comments—Areas Requiring Improvement

  • Problems with electronic reception systems
  • Employees who answer calls not identified

Client Services: Plan of Action

  • Clarify respective responsibilities regarding the management of electronic reception systems
  • Make managers responsible aware of problems encountered
  • Remind employees of the appropriate way to deal with external and internal clients

Improvements in Service Over the Past Year

Bar chart of Improvements in Service Over the Past Year

Overall Satisfaction

Bar chart of Overall Satisfaction

A Few Differences between Groups

Bar chart of A Few Differences between Groups (Offices other than 5 Place Ville Marie)

Bar chart of A Few Differences between Groups (Managers)

Conclusion

  • Clients generally very satisfied
  • Many comments and suggestions submitted
  • Constructive solutions proposed
  • Plan of action will be included in the Finance and Administration business plan for 2007–2008