Language selection

Search

Patent 3085192 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 3085192
(54) English Title: A SOIL-BASED FLOW-THROUGH RHIZOSPHERE SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED WATER AND SOIL
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE RHIZOSPHERE A ECOULEMENT CONTINU A BASE DE TERRE POUR LE TRAITEMENT D'EAU ET DE SOL CONTAMINES
Status: Pre-Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C02F 3/34 (2006.01)
  • B09C 1/08 (2006.01)
  • C02F 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C09K 3/32 (2006.01)
  • C09K 17/00 (2006.01)
  • C12N 1/20 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • GILL, LUCIAN STEPHEN (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • REED SCIENTIFIC CO. LTD. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • REED SCIENTIFIC SERVICES LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent: ALTITUDE IP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2018-12-06
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2019-07-11
Examination requested: 2022-09-15
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/CA2018/051563
(87) International Publication Number: WO2019/134028
(85) National Entry: 2020-06-09

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
62/612,929 United States of America 2018-01-02

Abstracts

English Abstract

A process for constructing a soil-based rhizosphere flow-through system to break down contaminants in contaminated water. The process includes the steps of: providing plants planted in soil in a test bioreactor, the plants providing a rhizosphere; exposing the rhizosphere to the contaminated water; extracting microorganisms from the rhizosphere following their exposure to the contaminated water; preparing a microbial suspension from the extract; subjecting the microbial suspension to growth conditions to increase the concentration of the microorganisms, thereby preparing a soil conditioner; adding the soil conditioner to soil in a contained area having a water flow inlet and outlet; and planting a plurality of plants in the soil, the plants being of the same species as the plants of the test bioreactor.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de construction d'un système de rhizosphère à écoulement continu à base de terre pour décomposer des polluants présents dans de l'eau contaminée. Le procédé comprend les étapes consistant à : fournir des végétaux plantées dans le sol d'un bioréacteur d'essai, les végétaux fournissant une rhizosphère; exposer la rhizosphère à l'eau contaminée; extraire des micro-organismes de la rhizosphère après leur exposition à l'eau contaminée; préparer une suspension microbienne à partir de l'extrait; soumettre la suspension microbienne à des conditions de croissance pour augmenter la concentration des micro-organismes, ce qui permet de préparer un amendement de sol ; ajouter l'amendement de sol dans le sol dans un milieu confiné ayant une entrée et une sortie d'écoulement d'eau; et planter une pluralité de végétaux dans le sol, les végétaux étant de la même espèce que ceux du bioréacteur d'essai.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
CLAIMS
1. A
process for preparing a soil conditioner to increase the rate of
decontamination
of contaminated water or contaminated soil, the process comprising:
a) providing a rhizosphere;
b) exposing the rhizosphere to the contaminated water;
c) extracting microorganisms from the rhizosphere after step b);
d) preparing a microbial suspension from the extract; and
e) subjecting the microbial suspension to growth conditions to increase the
concentration of the microorganisms, thereby preparing the soil conditioner.
2. The
process of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises generating a flow of the
contaminated water across the rhizosphere, the flow entering at an inlet and
exiting at an
outlet.
3. The
process of claim 2, wherein the flow of the contaminated water is conducted
for a period of about 4 to about 8 weeks.
4. The
process of claim 2 or 3, further comprising testing of outflow from the outlet
to
identify one or more metabolic products of one or more contaminants present in
the
contaminated water.
5. The
process of any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising measuring the amount
of microorganisms present in the extract in the microbial suspension.
6. The
process of any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising measuring the amount
of microorganisms present in the soil conditioner, wherein a plate count of at
least about
106 counts/mL indicates that the soil conditioner is suitable for use in
treatment of a soil
bed in construction of the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system.
7. The
process of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the rhizosphere is of a wetland
plant.
39

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
8. The process of claim 7, wherein the wetland plant is selected from the
group
consisting of Phragmites australis, Arundo donax L., Neyraudia reynaudiana,
Phalaris
arundinacea, Glyceria maxima, Elegia tectorum, Thamnochortus insignis, a
species of
the genus Calamagrostis, a species of the genus Sparganium, and a species of
the
genus Typha.
9. The process of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein steps a) and b) are
conducted in
a test bioreactor having a volume of about 10 L to about 50 L.
10. The process of any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the contaminated water
comprises organic contaminants.
11. The process of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the microbial suspension

comprises microorganisms originally present in the contaminated water and
microorganisms originally present in the rhizosphere.
12. A process for constructing a soil-based rhizosphere flow-through system to
break
down contaminants in contaminated water, the process comprising:
a) providing plants planted in soil in a test bioreactor, the plants providing
a
rhizosphere;
b) exposing the rhizosphere to the contaminated water;
c) extracting microorganisms from the rhizosphere after step b);
d) preparing a microbial suspension from the extract;
e) subjecting the microbial suspension to growth conditions to increase the
concentration of the microorganisms, thereby preparing a soil conditioner;
f) adding the soil conditioner to soil in a contained area having a water flow
inlet
and outlet; and
g) planting a plurality of plants in the soil, the plants being of the same
species as
the plants of step a).

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
13. The process of claim 12, wherein step b) comprises generating a flow of
the
contaminated water across the rhizosphere, the flow entering at an inlet and
exiting at an
outlet.
14. The process of claim 13, wherein the flow of the contaminated water is
conducted
for a period of about 4 to about 8 weeks.
15. The process of any one of claims 13 or 14, further comprising testing of
outflow
from the outlet to identify one or more metabolic products of one or more
contaminants
present in the contaminated water.
16. The process of any one of claims 12 to 15, further comprising measuring
the
amount of microorganisms present in the extract in the microbial suspension.
17. The process of any one of claims 12 to 16, further comprising measuring
the
amount of microorganisms present in the soil conditioner, wherein a plate
count of at
least about 106 counts/mL indicates that the soil conditioner is suitable for
use in
treatment of a soil bed in construction of the soil-based flow-through
rhizosphere system.
18. The process of any one of claims 12 to 17, wherein the rhizosphere is
of a wetland
plant.
19. The process of claim 18, wherein the wetland plant is selected from the
group
consisting of Phragmites australis, Arundo donax L., Neyraudia reynaudiana,
Phalaris
arundinacea, Glyceria maxima, Elegia tectorum, Thamnochortus insignis, a
species of
the genus Calamagrostis, a species of the genus Sparganium, and a species of
the
genus Typha.
20. The process of any one of claims 12 to 19, wherein steps a) and b) are
conducted
in a test bioreactor having a volume of about 10 L to about 50 L.
21. The process of any one of claims 12 to 20, wherein the contaminated water
comprises organic contaminants.
41

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
22. The process of any one of claims 12 to 21, wherein the microbial
suspension
comprises microorganisms originally present in the contaminated water and
microorganisms originally present in the rhizosphere.
23. A soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system for breaking down contaminant

organic compounds in contaminated water, the system comprising:
a) a contained area comprising soil treated with a soil conditioner prepared
according to the process of any one of claims 1 to 11 and planted with plants
of
the same species as the rhizosphere, the contained area having a water flow
inlet and a flow outlet;
b) a tank for holding the contaminated water before entry of the contaminated
water
into the contained area; the tank in flow communication with the flow inlet;
and
c) a retention pond in communication with the flow outlet.
24. The system of claim 23 further comprising a soak-away discharge pond in
flow
communication with the retention pond to allow discharge of treated water into
the
environment.
25. The system of claim 23 or claim 24 further comprising a recirculation line
in flow
communication between the retention pond and the water flow inlet.
26. The system of any one of claims 23 to 25 wherein the contained area is a
container configured to provide predominately horizontal flow of the
contaminated water
from the flow inlet to the flow outlet.
27. The system of claim 26 wherein the container comprises a soil depth of
between
about 0.4 m to about 0.5 m to provide a predominately aerobic soil
environment.
28. The system of any one of claims 23 to 25 wherein the contained area is a
container configured to provide predominately vertical flow of the
contaminated water
from the flow inlet to the flow outlet.
42

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
29. The system of claim 28, wherein the container comprises a soil depth of
between
about 0.8 m to about 1.0 m to provide soil having both a predominately aerobic
soil
environment closer to the soil surface and a predominately anaerobic soil
environment
closer to the bottom of the container.
30. A process for breaking down contaminant compounds in contaminated soil,
the
process comprising:
a) isolating contaminated water from the contaminated soil;
b) providing a rhizosphere;
c) exposing the rhizosphere to the contaminated water;
d) extracting microorganisms from the rhizosphere after step c);
e) preparing a microbial suspension from the extract;
f) subjecting the microbial suspension to growth conditions to increase the
concentration of the microorganisms, thereby preparing a soil conditioner; and
g) treating the contaminated soil with the soil conditioner.
31. The process of claim 30, wherein step c) comprises generating a flow of
the
contaminated water across the rhizosphere, the flow entering at an inlet and
exiting at an
outlet.
32. The
process of claim 31, wherein the flow of the contaminated water is conducted
for a period of about 4 to about 8 weeks.
33. The process of any one of claims 31 or 32, further comprising testing of
outflow
from the outlet to identify one or more metabolic products of one or more
contaminants
present in the contaminated water.
34. The process of any one of claims 30 to 33, further comprising measuring
the
amount of microorganisms present in the extract in the microbial suspension.
43

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
35. The process of any one of claims 30 to 34, further comprising measuring
the
amount of microorganisms present in the soil conditioner, wherein a plate
count of at
least about 106 counts/mL indicates that the soil conditioner is suitable for
use in
treatment of the contaminated soil.
36. The process of any one of claims 30 to 35, wherein the rhizome is of a
wetland
plant.
37. The process of claim 36, wherein the wetland plant is selected from the
group
consisting of Phragmites australis, Arundo donax L., Neyraudia reynaudiana,
Phalaris
arundinacea, Glyceria maxima, Elegia tectorum, Thamnochortus insignis, a
species of
the genus Calamagrostis, a species of the genus Sparganium, and a species of
the
genus Typha.
38. The process of any one of claims 30 to 37, wherein step c) is conducted in
a test
bioreactor having a volume of about 10 L to about 50 L.
39. The process of any one of claims 30 to 38, wherein the contaminated water
comprises organic contaminants.
40. The process of any one of claims 30 to 39, wherein the microbial
suspension
comprises microorganisms originally present in the contaminated soil and
microorganisms originally present in the rhizosphere.
44

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
A Soil-Based Flow-Through Rhizosphere System for Treatment
of Contaminated Water and Soil
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The invention relates to treatment of contaminated water and more
specifically to
systems for treating contaminated water and soil using processes based on soil-
based
rhizosphere flow-through systems. Processes for construction of the systems
and
implementation of the processes are described.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The breakdown of organic chemical contaminants (also known as
"recalcitrants")
in wastewater and in soil is a widely known problem. Mechanical treatment
systems are
generally not very effective at breaking down organic chemical contaminants
and even
when they are used, they are energy intensive, require rigorous maintenance
and have
high operating costs.
[0003] Systems known as "constructed wetlands" are a type of reed bed
technology
based on reeds planted in gravel substrates. Such constructed wetlands cannot
provide
treatment of contaminated water with high concentrations of contaminant
compounds
and as such, tend to be limited to treatment of effluents with low loads of
contaminants
and/or effluents with chemically simple contaminants. In instances where
constructed
wetlands are employed for less problematic organic contaminants, the treatment

systems generally have a limited operational lifetime due to the buildup of
sediment
and/or precipitates. The impenetrable nature of the gravel based media limits
the
positive effect that rhizome regeneration can have on the sediments and
precipitates,
preventing continual mixing and interaction of the soil with the plant matrix.
As such, the
hydraulic conductivity on constructed wetlands is significantly reduced after
a period of
approximately 8-12 years at which point, the gravel substrate requires
refurbishment or
replacement. Additional stages to constructed wetland treatment systems have
been
incorporated at the front and/or back end of these treatment systems. These
"bolt-on"
solutions have included installation of a charcoal filter at the front and/or
back end of the
treatment system. The charcoal filtration unit allows for adsorption of the
contaminants
1

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
onto charcoal. Such a filter must be removed and replaced periodically and
disposed of
into a landfill. Another modification has been incorporation of forced
aeration solutions
within a constructed wetland design so as to increase the oxygenation of the
effluent.
[0004] These modifications to constructed wetlands have been able to achieve
the
required chemical loading reductions. However, they are far from best practice
solutions.
Removal of filtration units and disposal into landfill is an unnecessary
operating cost and
is to the detriment of the environment. Ultimately this method is removal, and
not
treatment (i.e. breakdown and/or mineralization into harmless substances). The
disposal
of this waste into landfill goes against the sustainability criteria claimed
by such
constructed wetland systems. The use of forced aeration systems within a
constructed
wetland ultimately is the creation of a mechanical/biological hybrid treatment
system.
The use of mechanical methods to increase treatment capabilities is also to
the
detriment of capital and operating expenditures and the sustainability
criteria claimed by
constructed wetland systems.
[0005] Conventional soil-based reed bed systems do not have the same issues
with
blockage which occur in constructed wetlands. The soil substrate promotes
rhizome
regeneration, therefore allowing sediments and precipitates to be amalgamated
and
integrated into the soil. Hydraulic pathways are continually renewed and
therefore soil-
based reed bed systems do not require refurbishment or replacement.
[0006] Early efforts to adapt reed beds for treating water containing organic
contaminants conducted by Reinhold Kickuth are described in US patents
5,637,218,
5,273,653, 4,904,386, 4,855,040, and 4,793,929, each of which is incorporated
herein
by reference in its entirety. Additional efforts relating to mechanical
aspects of moving
water through wetland cell systems are described in US patents 6,652,743,
6,576,130,
6,406,627 and 6,200,469, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in
its
entirety.
[0007] JP 3618785, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes
a method
for cleaning contaminated soil using crushed cell bodies of microorganisms
that have
enzymes capable of decomposing contaminants. Preferred microorganisms are
2

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
pseudomonads of specific species and strains. Decontamination of volatile
organic
chlorine compounds such as trichloroethylene is described.
[0008] JP 11090411A, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
method for decomposing contaminants in soil or ground water, particularly
aromatic
compounds such as creosole, trichloroethylene, and dichloroethylene using a
contaminant decomposing microorganism which is cultured in a culture medium
which
includes elements of the contaminated environment.
[0009] JP 2000312582A, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
microorganism capable of decomposing cyanide compounds which are useful for
treating soil, wastewater or underground water contaminated with cyanide
compounds.
The microorganisms are of the genus Cordona and the genus Burkholderia.
[0010] JP 2007160209A, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
method for improving water quality which includes collection of soil
containing a plurality
of microorganisms contaminated by sewage, separating the microorganisms and
identifying them in a purification process and supporting them on a porous
carrier
material in a sewage treatment system.
[0011] JP 2009154044A, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
method for purifying contaminated soil using microorganisms having the ability
to
degrade the contaminant (such as hydrocarbons, organic chlorine containing
compounds and cyanide compounds). The soil is sampled and tested to evaluate
the
applicability of bioremediation. The soil is combined with the microorganisms
in a soil
molded body which is charged into a well at the upstream end of a groundwater
stream
flowing through the contaminated soil area.
[0012] JP 2011084449A, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes
materials and methods for improving degraded and contaminated soil and
accelerating
cleaning of water. Selected microorganisms are cultured in a residual liquid
after starch
and gluten are extracted from wheat or grain. This material is used in a
number of
applications, including use as a waste treatment agent.
3

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0013] US 5,078,881, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
method for decontaminating solutions containing wastes (typically pesticides)
in a soil
bed reactor using a sample tank and a holding tank which is aerated. Water
from the
holding tank is applied to the upper soil surface of the soil bed reactor.
Microbial action
in the soil degrades the toxic materials.
[0014] US 5,458,747, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
process for in situ bio-electrokinetic remediation of contaminated soil
containing
hazardous mixed wastes as organic pollutants and hazardous heavy metals. Bio-
remediation of the organic pollutants is followed by removal of the hazardous
material.
Cultured microorganisms, nutrients and growth factors are added to clean soil
adjacent
to contaminated soil prior to initiating the bio-electrokinetic process.
[0015] US 6,599,423, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes
processes for destruction of air, water, and soil contaminants (especially
volatile organic
compounds and chloroethylenes, and particularly trichloroethylene) using
naturally
occurring microorganisms. The processes may be applied on a batch or
continuous
basis to contaminated soil and groundwater, to contaminated effluents from
industrial
operations. In one example, a procedure for obtaining a purified culture of
microorganisms useful in accordance with the present invention comprises the
steps of:
(1) collecting a sample of material from the site contaminated with obnoxious
chemicals;
(2) enriching the microorganisms found living in the sample; (3) separating
the strains of
microorganisms capable of having different metabolisms for the various
chemicals in the
sample from the site, from each other; (4) purifying the strains which are
capable of
biodegrading the chemicals to be disposed of; (5) applying the strain to the
locus of the
contaminants to be disposed of; and (6) monitoring of removal of the
contaminants.
[0016] US 8,420,362, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
method for increasing the concentration of calcium carbonate in a geomaterial
that
contains indigenous microorganisms capable of hydrolyzing urea to ammonia. The

method includes enriching the geomaterial with a source of nutrients, adding
urea to the
geomaterial which is hydrolyzed to ammonia and which raises the pH of the
geomaterial,
and adding a source of calcium ions to the geomaterial. Carbonate ions
obtained by the
hydrolysis of the urea combine with calcium ions to form calcium carbonate.
4

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0017] US 9,034,633, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
biopile-based bioremediation method for treatment of hydrocarbon waste with
high
aromatic content. A bio-pile is a bioremediation technology in which excavated
soils are
mixed with soil amendments, formed into compost piles, and enclosed for
treatment. The
basic bio-pile system includes a treatment bed, an aeration system, an
irrigation/nutrient
system and a leachate collection system. It is indicated that the isolated
microorganisms
are adsorbed on a biodegradable carrier and acclimatized to grow in the
presence of
aromatic hydrocarbon waste by adding samples of the contaminated soil or
waste.
[0018] US 8,696,907, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a plant
and a method for the treatment and disposal of waste water containing salts
and oil, in
particular produced water, comprising at least one settling area for receiving
the waste
water and for separating oil proportions from the waste water, at least one
subsequent
reed bed area having plants for the uptake and degradation of contaminants in
the waste
water, at least one modular basin area having a plurality of utility basins,
whereby a
utility basin, controlled by way of distribution means, can be supplied with
treated waste
water from the reed bed area and/or from at least one other utility basin, and
at least one
saline area for the reception of the residual water from the modular basin
area and for
the evaporation of water and the concentration of salt.
[0019] WO 2017/034827, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,
describes a
method for increasing the concentration of metal carbonates in a heavy metal
contaminated geomaterial utilizing indigenous ureolytic microorganisms. The
method
may be used for bioremediation of heavy metal contaminated geomaterials. There
is
description of addition of nutrients such as molasses to encourage growth of
microorganisms.
[0020] The contaminants in soil tend to move under the impact of rainfall and
groundwater and are then defined as pollution. Where rainfall carries the
pollution
downwards into the underlying strata, possibly an aquifer, then some type of
"pump and
treat" or microbiological injection is required to deal with pollution usually
defined as a
"plume".

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0021] For the surface and near surface material there exists expensive
systems such
as thermal desorption or excavation to landfill. However increasingly the
application of
microbiology is being used to decontaminate such soil. This technique is
usually applied
with limited mechanical application such as light ploughing or aggregating the
soil into a
"biopile."
[0022] The first stage in this process is quite costly however since it
generally involves
extraction of samples of the contaminated soil and determination and isolation
of any in
situ bacteria. The isolated bacterial population is then released against the
contaminants
to establish the efficiency of the isolate and then a fermentation process is
carried out to
increase the bacterial species concentrations. In many cases however, although
the
target chemical is broken down, the products of this action may be byproducts
which are
equally as toxic as the parent. The process itself stops at less than 100%
removal
because these byproducts become toxic to the bacteria carrying out the initial

degradation.
[0023] A need exists to improve soil-based reed-bed systems for more effective

treatment of water and soil containing organic contaminants.
SUMMARY
[0024] One aspect of the invention is a process for preparing a soil
conditioner to
increase the rate of decontamination of contaminated water or contaminated
soil, the
process comprising: a) providing a rhizosphere; b) exposing the rhizosphere to
the
contaminated water; extracting microorganisms from the rhizosphere after step
b); c)
preparing a microbial suspension from the extract; and d) subjecting the
microbial
suspension to growth conditions to increase the concentration of the
microorganisms,
thereby preparing the soil conditioner.
[0025] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
step b)
comprises generating a flow of the contaminated water across the rhizosphere,
the flow
entering at an inlet and exiting at an outlet.
[0026] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the flow of
the contaminated water is conducted for a period of about 4 to about 8 weeks.
6

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0027] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the process
further comprises testing of outflow from the outlet to identify one or more
metabolic
products of one or more contaminants present in the contaminated water.
[0028] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the process
further comprises measuring the amount of microorganisms present in the
extract in the
microbial suspension.
[0029] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the process
further comprises measuring the amount of microorganisms present in the soil
conditioner, wherein a plate count of at least about 106 counts/mL indicates
that the soil
conditioner is suitable for use in treatment of a soil bed in construction of
the soil-based
flow-through rhizosphere system.
[0030] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the
rhizosphere is of a wetland plant.
[0031] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the wetland
plant is selected from the group consisting of Phragmites australis, Arundo
donax L.,
Neyraudia reynaudiana, Phalaris arundinacea, Glyceria maxima, Elegia tectorum,

Thamnochortus insignis, a species of the genus Calamagrostis, a species of the
genus
Sparganium, and a species of the genus Typha.
[0032] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
steps a)
and b) are conducted in a test bioreactor having a volume of about 10 L to
about 50 L.
[0033] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the
contaminated water comprises organic contaminants.
[0034] In some embodiments of the process for preparing a soil conditioner,
the
microbial suspension comprises microorganisms originally present in the
contaminated
water and microorganisms originally present in the rhizosphere.
[0035] Another aspect of the invention is a process for constructing a soil-
based
rhizosphere flow-through system to break down contaminants in contaminated
water, the
7

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
process comprising: a) providing plants planted in soil in a test bioreactor,
the plants
providing a rhizosphere; b) exposing the rhizosphere to the contaminated
water; c)
extracting microorganisms from the rhizosphere after step b); d) preparing a
microbial
suspension from the extract; e) subjecting the microbial suspension to growth
conditions
to increase the concentration of the microorganisms, thereby preparing a soil
conditioner; f) adding the soil conditioner to soil in a contained area having
a water flow
inlet and outlet; and g) planting a plurality of plants in the soil, the
plants being of the
same species as the plants of step a).
[0036] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, step b) comprises generating a flow of the contaminated
water
across the rhizosphere, the flow entering at an inlet and exiting at an
outlet.
[0037] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the flow of the contaminated water is conducted for a
period of
about 4 to about 8 weeks.
[0038] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the process further comprises testing of outflow from the
outlet to
identify one or more metabolic products of one or more contaminants present in
the
contaminated water.
[0039] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the process further comprises measuring the amount of
microorganisms present in the extract in the microbial suspension.
[0040] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the process further comprises measuring the amount of
microorganisms present in the soil conditioner, wherein a plate count of at
least about
106 counts/mL indicates that the soil conditioner is suitable for use in
treatment of a soil
bed in construction of the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system.
[0041] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the rhizosphere is of a wetland plant.
8

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0042] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the wetland plant is selected from the group consisting
of
Phragmites australis, Arundo donax L., Neyraudia reynaudiana, Phalaris
arundinacea,
Glyceria maxima, Elegia tectorum, Thamnochortus insignis, a species of the
genus
Calamagrostis, a species of the genus Sparganium, and a species of the genus
Typha.
[0043] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, steps a) and b) are conducted in a test bioreactor having
a volume
of about 10 L to about 50 L.
[0044] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the contaminated water comprises organic contaminants.
[0045] In some embodiments of the process for constructing a soil-based
rhizosphere
flow-through system, the microbial suspension comprises microorganisms
originally
present in the contaminated water and microorganisms originally present in the

rhizosphere.
[0046] Another aspect of the invention is a soil-based flow-through
rhizosphere system
for breaking down contaminant organic compounds in contaminated water, the
system
comprising: a) a contained area comprising soil treated with a soil
conditioner prepared
according to the process described herein and planted with plants of the same
species
as the rhizosphere, the contained area having a water flow inlet and a flow
outlet; b) a
tank for holding the contaminated water before entry of the contaminated water
into the
contained area; the tank in flow communication with the flow inlet; and c) a
retention
pond in communication with the flow outlet.
[0047] In some embodiments, the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system
further
comprises a soak-away discharge pond in flow communication with the retention
pond to
allow discharge of treated water into the environment.
[0048] In some embodiments, the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system
further
comprises a recirculation line in flow communication between the retention
pond and the
water flow inlet.
9

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0049] In some embodiments of the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system,
the
contained area is a container configured to provide predominately horizontal
flow of the
contaminated water from the flow inlet to the flow outlet.
[0050] In some embodiments of the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system,
the
container comprises a soil depth of between about 0.4 m to about 0.5 m to
provide a
predominately aerobic soil environment.
[0051] In some embodiments of the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system,
the
contained area is a container configured to provide predominately vertical
flow of the
contaminated water from the flow inlet to the flow outlet.
[0052] In some embodiments of the soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system,
the
container comprises a soil depth of between about 0.8 m to about 1.0 m to
provide soil
having both a predominately aerobic soil environment closer to the soil
surface and a
predominately anaerobic soil environment closer to the bottom of the
container.
[0053] Another aspect of the invention is a process for breaking down
contaminant
compounds in contaminated soil, the process comprising: a) isolating
contaminated
water from the contaminated soil; b) providing a rhizosphere; c) exposing the
rhizosphere to the contaminated water; d) extracting microorganisms from the
rhizosphere after step e); preparing a microbial suspension from the extract;
f) subjecting
the microbial suspension to growth conditions to increase the concentration of
the
microorganisms, thereby preparing a soil conditioner; and g) treating the
contaminated
soil with the soil conditioner.
[0054] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, step c) comprises generating a flow of the contaminated
water
across the rhizosphere, the flow entering at an inlet and exiting at an
outlet.
[0055] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the flow of the contaminated water is conducted for a
period of
about 4 to about 8 weeks.

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0056] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the process further comprises testing of outflow from
the outlet to
identify one or more metabolic products of one or more contaminants present in
the
contaminated water.
[0057] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the process further comprises measuring the amount of
microorganisms present in the extract in the microbial suspension.
[0058] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the process further comprises measuring the amount of
microorganisms present in the soil conditioner, wherein a plate count of at
least about
106 counts/mL indicates that the soil conditioner is suitable for use in
treatment of the
contaminated soil.
[0059] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the rhizome is of a wetland plant.
[0060] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the wetland plant is selected from the group consisting
of
Phragmites australis, Arundo donax L., Neyraudia reynaudiana, Phalaris
arundinacea,
Glyceria maxima, Elegia tectorum, Thamnochortus insignis, a species of the
genus
Calamagrostis, a species of the genus Sparganium, and a species of the genus
Typha.
[0061] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, step c) is conducted in a test bioreactor having a
volume of about
L to about 50 L.
[0062] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the contaminated water comprises organic contaminants.
[0063] In some embodiments of the process for breaking down contaminant
compounds
in contaminated soil, the microbial suspension comprises microorganisms
originally
present in the contaminated soil and microorganisms originally present in the
rhizosphere.
11

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0064] Various objects, features and advantages of the invention will be
apparent from
the following description of particular embodiments of the invention, as
illustrated in the
accompanying drawings. The drawings are not necessarily to scale. Emphasis is
instead placed upon illustrating the principles of various embodiments of the
invention.
Figure 1 is an illustration of an embodiment of a process for constructing a
soil-
based rhizosphere flow-through system.
Figure 2 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a two-phase process for breaking
down contaminants in contaminated water using a soil-based rhizosphere flow-
through system, according to Example 1.
Figure 3 is a perspective illustration of a two-phase treatment system 10.
Figure 4 is a plan view showing a soil-based rhizosphere flow through system
with an arrangement of horizontal beds (A-D) for a first phase, an arrangement
of
corresponding vertical beds (E-H) in a second phase, and a series of
corresponding retention ponds (I-L) as well as inlets, outlets and collector
conduits used in the system.
Figure 5 is a plot of concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethylene vs. time with
daily
measurements at three different points in the system of Figure 4, providing
evidence of effective breakdown of contaminants.
Figure 6 is a plot of concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethylene vs. time with
daily
measurements at two different points in the system of Figure 4, providing
evidence of effective breakdown of contaminants.
Figure 7 is a plot of percentage contaminant load reduction through treatment
phases 1 and 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Rationale and Overview
12

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0065] The use of a soil substrate for a rhizosphere system rather than gravel
provides
distinct advantages over constructed wetlands in terms of treatment capacity.
The
present inventor has recognized that soil has a significantly larger surface
area than
gravel and that this extra surface area allows a significantly larger
population of
microorganisms to populate a soil-based substrate. A larger population of
microorganisms is directly proportional to more effective treatment potential
per unit of
surface area of a treatment system. This gives a soil-based rhizosphere system
greater
treatment capacity.
[0066] A number of shortcomings of using soil-based rhizosphere systems to
treat
contaminated water have been recognized by the present inventor. One problem
is the
excessive length of time required to develop treatment capacity within a soil-
based
rhizosphere system. Another problem which occurs from time to time is poor
reproducibility and a related inability to guarantee successful treatment.
Simply relying
upon the microbial ecology of the soil without enrichment is not sufficient to
ensure that a
given soil-based rhizosphere system will efficiently break down organic
contaminants in
water or in soil. It was recognized by the inventor that populations of
bacteria present in
both the rhizome itself and in contaminated water and/or soil can be induced
to adapt to
each other and speciate to improve the extent of decontamination. It was also
recognized that such conditions should avoid exposing the rhizome and root
structure to
excessive levels of organic contaminants in order to avoid stressing or shock-
loading the
plants. It was further recognized that an establishment phase between
commissioning of
a soil-based reed bed system and full operation of the system would have the
effect of
limiting detrimental impacts on the plants and microbial populations in the
soil and
rhizome of the plants.
[0067] The microbial populations within a soil-based reed bed system include
naturally
occurring bacteria within the soil and the rhizome of the plant. This
microbial population
develops and speciates under the impact of the contaminated water added to the

system. As such the microbial population becomes somewhat limited, thereby
limiting
the intensity of treatment.
[0068] Overcoming the aforementioned shortcomings of soil-based reed bed
systems
has until now required a number of possible strategies to minimize problems
which may
13

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
occur. Such strategies have included (i) incorporation of a long establishment
phase to
allow the microbial populations to develop; (ii) costly construction and
operation of a pilot
treatment system to confirm proof of operation; and (iii) restricting the
application of soil-
based reed bed systems to less chemically complex organic contaminants. In
addition to
these strategies, the risks accepted are that the desired treatment standards
may not be
achieved and that such failures may result in penalties against the technology
provider.
[0069] With respect to treatment of contaminated soil using a biopile, two
major
problems exist. Firstly, a complex mixture of chemical pollutants, such as
pesticides
may, by acting synergistically, inhibit all bacterial activity such that the
soil is biologically
dead. This process is becoming apparent in soils that have pesticide,
herbicide sprayed
on them as part of the agricultural cycle with the decrease in soil organisms
producing
substantial drop in yield. The second case involves situations whereby a low
level of
microbiological activity is present but is suppressed by its own waste
products (the
breakdown products).
[0070] The complete removal of contaminants and the byproducts therefore
requires a
series of microbiological co-metabolic actions to occur to complete the
degradation.
[0071] The present inventor has recognized that within nature, collections of
organisms
capable of providing such co-metabolic activity are present in the
rhizospheres of certain
classes of plants. The soil microorganisms act together to produce a
multiplicity of
reaction pathways. At its simplest, the catabolic and metabolic activity
within the
rhizosphere which breaks down fertilizer and other nutrients to synthesize
plant tissue
provides the soil domain necessary for a complex mixture of microorganisms to
develop.
[0072] The present invention therefore relates to the methodology of using
plant
rhizosphere which has been created within a contaminated soil matrix thereby
producing
a consortium of bacteria and other soil microorganisms which are capable of
completely
degrading the contamination contained therein. This methodology produces a
liquid
extract herein referred to as "soil conditioner" which contains high levels of
appropriate
organisms which can be applied, for example by conventional methods such as
simple
spray techniques to the contaminated soil. The expensive steps of isolation,
identification and fermentation of individual species and strains of
microorganisms are
14

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
not required and the resulting product overcomes the present deficiencies of
conventional bioremediation techniques.
[0073] Various embodiments of the process described hereinbelow incorporate
microorganisms present within the contaminated water or soil and the rhizome
of the
plant, as well as the soil containing the rhizome (which are collectively
referred to as the
"rhizosphere." These microorganisms are extracted, and subjected to growth
conditions
to increase their concentrations, thereby providing a soil conditioner. This
soil-
conditioner is added to the soil to increase the total metabolic activity
provided by the
microorganisms in development of a stabilized soil matrix for the rhizosphere
to be used
for degradation of organic contaminants in the contaminated water or in
contaminated
soil.
Definitions
[0074] As used herein, the terms "contaminated water" and "contaminated soil"
refers to
water containing any type of contaminant, in particular an organic contaminant
whose
presence is undesirable and potentially harmful to individuals and/or the
environment.
Examples of contaminated water may include, but are not limited to effluents,
leachates
from landfills or other waste sites, waste water, and contaminated ground
water from
sites of chemical plants, mining sites or sites where petroleum products are
extracted.
Examples of contaminated soils may include, but are not limited to soils
contaminated
with industrial compounds from sites of production of such compounds, soils at
locations
of industrial accidents or spills, and the like.
[0075] As used herein, the term "rhizome" refers to a mass of roots. The
overall root
structure includes primary, secondary and tertiary roots. One characteristic
of rhizomes
is that they can grow horizontally.
[0076] As used herein, the term "rhizosphere" refers to a rhizome and its
surrounding
soil environment. In some circumstances described herein, rhizospheres are
contained
within a reed bed used to break down contaminants. In context of the methods
and
systems described herein, a rhizosphere is expected to at least include
microorganisms
originally present in the soil environment and microorganisms originally
present in the
rhizome. Furthermore, the rhizosphere may also include microorganisms
originally

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
present in a specific sample of contaminated water or a specific sample of
contaminated
soil which is to be treated by the processes and systems described herein. In
this
context, a rhizosphere is in a suitable condition for metabolizing
contaminants when
microorganisms originally present in or on the rhizome, microorganisms
originally
present in the reed bed soil, and microorganisms originally present in the
contaminated
water or soil are adapted to each other's presence and providing continuously
high
biological activity towards metabolizing contaminants. This adaptation may
include
symbiotic relationships among groups of microorganisms.
[0077] As used herein, the term "wetland plant" refers to plants that
naturally grow in
water within wetlands, which are areas where water covers the soil or is
present either at
or near the surface of the soil. Typical wetlands consist of marshes or
swamps.
[0078] As used herein, the term "reed" refers to a slender-leaved plant of the
grass
family which grows in a wetland or in water. As such, reeds are considered to
be wetland
plants.
[0079] As used herein, the term "effluent" refers to a discharge of industrial
waste,
sewage or other pollutant which contains contaminants.
[0080] As used herein, the term "leachate" refers to water which has percolate
through a
solid and leached some of the constituents of the solid. Leachates from
landfills or
industrial sites can contain harmful contaminants.
[0081] As used herein, the term "speciation" refers to formation of new and
distinct
species in the course of evolution. The term is used in context of rapid
evolution of
microorganisms which occurs on a relatively fast time scale, such as during
the course
of preparation of soil conditioner.
[0082] As used herein, the term "constructed wetland" refers to a type of reed
bed
technology based on reeds planted in gravel substrates. This is distinct from
and not to
be confused with a "soil-based rhizosphere flow-through system."
16

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0083] As used herein, the term "soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system"
refers to
an installation configured to allow water to flow therethrough with the water
contacting a
soil substrate containing a rhizome as it flows through the system.
[0084] As used herein, the term "plate count" refers to a fundamental
technique for
determining the number of viable microorganism cells in a sample. The sample
is spread
on an agar plate and incubated to promote growth of the microorganisms on the
plate.
Colonies of microorganisms are counted with the extent of dilution of the
original sample
being taken into account. The amounts of microorganisms are typically
expressed in
units of counts per mL.
[0085] As used herein, the term "organic contaminants" refers to any organic
compounds whose presence is generally considered undesirable and/or
potentially
harmful or toxic.
[0086] As used herein, the terms "breaking down contaminants," and
"metabolizing
contaminants" are synonymous and refer to destruction of contaminants via
metabolic
pathways (breakdown pathways) of microorganisms.
[0087] As used herein, the term "thermal desorption" refers to is an
environmental
remediation technology that utilizes heat to increase the volatility of
contaminants such
that they can be removed (separated) from the solid matrix.
Description of a General Process Embodiment and Related Equipment
[0088] The components and process steps general embodiment will now be
described.
A number of possible alternative features are introduced during the course of
this
description. It is to be understood that, according to the knowledge and
judgment of
persons skilled in the art, such alternative features may be substituted in
various
combinations to arrive at different embodiments of the present invention.
[0089] An illustration of one embodiment of a process including the main steps
involved
in construction of a large-scale soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system is
shown in
Figure 1. It is shown that a test bioreactor is prepared with a soil-based
rhizosphere
system and configured for inflow of contaminated water and outflow of flow-
through
water which may or may not have had a significant degree of decontamination at
the
17

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
outset. Flow of contaminated water through the test bioreactor is maintained
until it is
found that an equilibrium state has been attained (as determined by collection
of data)
wherein the microbial population has been stabilized by the conditions. The
microbial
population will include microorganisms originally present in the contaminated
water and
originally present in the rhizome of the plant and the soil within the test
bioreactor. With
attainment of equilibrium deemed to be sufficient for further development of a
larger-
scale system, a sample of the rhizosphere is obtained from the bioreactor and
homogenized. A microbial suspension is extracted from the homogenized mixture.
This
microbial suspension is reasonably assumed to include at least some of the
microorganisms originally present in the contaminated water and at least some
of the
microorganisms originally present on and within the rhizome as well as the
soil in the
test bioreactor. The microbial suspension is incubated and fed nutrients to
promote
growth of the microorganisms to increase the concentration of total
microorganisms,
thereby providing the soil conditioner. The soil conditioner is applied to the
soil within a
large-scale contained area to increase the soil content of microorganisms that
can
metabolize contaminants. Then the same plant used in the test bioreactor is
installed in
greater numbers in the soil of the large scale contained area in the final
step of
construction of the large-scale soil-based flow-through rhizosphere system.
[0090] Additional detail regarding various aspects, process steps and
components of
this general embodiment will now be described under separate headings.
Wetland Reeds and Plants
[0091] The term "reed" is a common name used to identify several tall grass-
like plants
which grow in wetlands. A preferred reed for use in embodiments of the process
and
system of the invention is Phragmites australis due to this wetland species
being
generally regarded as having the greatest root mass and production of oxygen.
These
are favorable characteristics for embodiments of the process of the invention.
Any other
wetland reed species or non-reed species that have a root mass that provides
oxygen
into the ground will exhibit a similar activity although possibly at lower
levels. As such,
other wetland plant species may be employed in embodiments of the process of
the
present invention. Examples of other reed species include, but are not limited
to Arundo
donax L., Neyraudia reynaudiana, Phalaris arundinacea, Glyceria maxima, Elegia
18

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
tectorum, Thamnochortus insignis, species of the genus Calamagrostis, species
of the
genus Sparganium, and species of the genus Typha. The selection of the wetland
plant
for use in various embodiments of the process and system of the invention will
depend
on a number of factors such as soil compatibility, climate at the location of
installation,
and the characteristics of the selected plant itself, for example. Plants
other than reeds
may be found to have favorable characteristics and, as such, may be adaptable
for use
in various alternative embodiments of the invention.
Reed Tub Test Bioreactor
[0092] A container with a volume ranging from about 10 L to about 50 L,
preferably
about 25 L in volume with an inlet and outlet which allows for the flow and
control of
input of contaminated water, is filled with a soil matrix which may be
composed of topsoil
or another class of soil. Other components may be added as deemed required to
aid in
growth of the plant and its rhizome or to increase flow of water through the
container.
Such components may include various organic additives as well as sand to
provide
additional water permeability. This mixture is planted with rhizome plant
material such as
Phragmites australis and the plants are allowed to develop and grow to the
point that the
container becomes a rhizosphere full of rhizome plant material.
[0093] In addition to a liquid conduit arrangement that allows liquids to flow
through the
container (by passage through the soil/plant matrix), valves are included to
retain liquids
within the container without flow in situations where halting the flow through
the
container is desired.
General Identification of Microorganisms Present in Contaminated Water or
Contaminated Soil
[0094] It is advantageous to analyze a sample of the contaminated water or
contaminated soil which is to be treated using the soil-based flow-through
rhizosphere
system. To do this, any microbiological identification method or process may
be used,
from culture on agar plates to genetic-based analyses. Generally, growth of
microorganisms on plates in a manner which permits their identification may be
a useful
process step. However, identification of the microorganisms at the species and
strain
level, while potentially advantageous, is not necessary. Microorganisms in
contaminated
water such as effluents and leachates are known to include bacteria, algae and
fungi.
19

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
Although not all three classes are always present, bacteria are usually
present in
contaminated water or contaminated soil and usually through natural selection
processes, have the ability to metabolize the organic contaminants therein.
Generally,
the quantity of bacteria present in the contaminated water or contaminated
soil is an
indicator of the likelihood that certain species and strains of bacteria in
the contaminated
water or contaminated soil will adapt under the bioreactor conditions to
metabolize the
contaminating compounds. In situations where the quantity of bacteria in the
contaminated water or contaminated soil is deemed to be very low, the
contaminated
water or contaminated soil is inoculated with a publically-available mixture
of bacteria
which would be expected to contain bacteria that could adapt and speciate
appropriately
to metabolize the contaminants. Such bacterial mixtures can be identified by a
person
having ordinary skill in the art, without undue experimentation.
Introduction of Contaminated Water into a Reed Tub Test Bioreactor
[0095] The contaminated water is introduced into the test bioreactor via one
or more
inlet conduits and the rate of flow of water into and out of the box is
measured. It is
helpful to determine the maximum volume which can pass through the system over
a
given period of time without flooding the test bioreactor.
[0096] Indicators of the system such as pH, dissolved oxygen and electrical
conductivity
are measured together with the oxidation-reduction potential of the system,
which is an
indicator of aerobic/anaerobic state of the below surface condition of the
soil rhizosphere
solution.
[0097] After a period of time, once steady state conditions have been
achieved, as
evidenced by the data indicators, the microbial population is assessed. This
is typically
done with a basic plate count using standard plates and nutrients.
Additionally, some
indicator of a concentration of a microbial species of interest will be added
to the
analytical parameters. This for example may be the simple chemical oxygen
demand
(COD) as a measure of declining contaminant concentration, or UV, GC or mass
spectrometry analysis, depending on the nature of the species of interest.

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0098] In some situations where contaminant compounds are particularly complex
and
difficult to metabolize, a co-metabolite such as a carbohydrate may be added
to increase
metabolic activity of the microbial species present.
[0099] Organic compounds are known to break down through specific metabolic
pathways which produce metabolite compounds. It is therefore possible to
determine the
concentration of a particular metabolite at the inlet and outlet of the
container and also to
search for the metabolites generated within the system. This allows the
possibility that
the compound is simply being removed from solution by simple soil adsorption
and the
compound as well as its metabolites can be tracked through the system by the
methods
outlined above.
[0100] The process of degradation and breakdown may take anywhere between 1 to
8
weeks before soil organisms can respond to give complete degradation of the
target
compound. In this period the small quantities of incipient bacteria usually of
about 102
counts/mL or less, will have risen to about 106 to 109 counts/mL. During this
process,
and depending on the concentration of the material to be degraded, the system
may
have shifted to an anaerobic condition and/or an altered pH condition. These
conditions
are intermittently or continuously monitored to avoid potential problems
arising from
dynamic conditions that can affect the rate of metabolic breakdown of the
contaminants.
[0101] If the trial is successful and clear evidence exists for degradation of
the target
compound, then the next stage of the operation can be carried out. Otherwise,
the
process steps outlined hereinabove are repeated under different conditions.
Extraction and Concentration of Microorganisms to Produce Soil Conditioner
[0102] The next step in the operation is to extract and increase the soil
rhizosphere with
microorganisms whose symbiotic relationship have produced the degradation.
These
total microorganisms include microorganisms originally present in the
contaminated
water and present on and within the rhizome of the wetland plant, as well as
microorganisms present in the soil containing the rhizome of the wetland
plant. A portion
of rhizome and rhizosphere soil is homogenized and placed into a container in
the
presence of a nutrient mixture, such as a sugar/molasses mixture for example,
with the
temperature maintained at about 30 C for a period of about 7 to about 10 days,
21

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
producing a concentrated liquid containing the appropriate microorganisms.
This
concentrated liquid is hereinafter referred to as the "soil conditioner."
While not typically
characterized to determine relative amounts of specific microorganisms in the
soil
conditioner, it is believed that the soil conditioner includes a population of

microorganisms which will function symbiotically or otherwise cooperatively in
metabolic
breakdown of the contaminants of the contaminated water or contaminated soil.
Application of the Soil Conditioner to the Soil of the Flow-Through
Rhizosphere System
or Contaminated Soil at a Contaminated Site
[0103] The soil conditioner is diluted and sprayed onto the soil growing
matrix which is
to be used within the full-scale flow-through rhizosphere system. The wetland
plant is
then planted in this soil matrix. Alternatively, the soil conditioner may be
added to a wide
area of contaminated soil at a contaminated site without planting a wetland
plant. The
microorganisms carefully developed and speciated during preparation of the
soil
conditioner are introduced as significant populations into the full-scale flow-
through
rhizosphere system. Therefore, the application of the soil conditioner that
has been
produced specifically for the specific contaminated water being treated
provides the
following: (i) a reduction of the required establishment period, thereby
reducing the time
required to bring the system on-line after construction, (ii) a reduction of
risk required to
be imposed on the client, by the technology provider, (iii) an increase in
confidence that
the treatment system will perform as designed, therefore limiting risk of non-
performance
penalties being triggered and/or allowing increased value of guarantees to be
provided
to the client, (iv) a reduced requirement for pilot treatment systems where
pilot systems
are deemed necessary by the technology provider, and (v) an increased market
due to
increased treatment capabilities and therefore less restriction on the
complexity of the
chemical compounds that can be treated.
Flow Conduits in the Flow-Through Rhizosphere System
[0104] Prior to planting the wetland plant in the flow-through rhizosphere
system, the
soil treated with the soil conditioner is provided with at least one conduit
for flowing the
contaminated water into the rhizosphere system and at least one conduit outlet
to allow
discharge of de-contaminated water from the system. The arrangement of
conduits may
be provided in essentially any configuration which allows the contaminated
water to
22

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
disperse across as much of the rhizosphere in the system as possible. It is
believed that
the large surface area of soil particles allows more efficient penetration of
water to occur
across the entire soil bed to allow the microorganisms to metabolize the
contaminants.
[0105] Some embodiments employ a system constructed for a predominantly
horizontal
flow of water dispersed across the rhizosphere wherein the input of
contaminated water
will flow to one or more exit points not varying appreciably in elevation
relative to the
input elevation, while other embodiments employ a system constructed for a
predominantly vertical flow of water wherein the input of contaminated water
will flow to
one or more exit points which are significantly lower in elevation relative to
the input
elevation. It is to be understood that diffusion of oxygen occurs more readily
within
shallower soil installations than in deeper soil installations. As a result,
microorganisms
with anaerobic metabolic pathways being used in the breakdown of contaminants
will be
expected to operate more effectively in vertical flow arrangements with deeper
soil beds
and microorganisms with aerobic metabolic pathways will be expected to operate
more
effectively in horizontal flow arrangements. In some embodiments, a complete
treatment
system may include both horizontal flow and vertical flow arrangements
operating
sequentially, as described in Example 1. The sequence may be determined
through
testing using small scale treatment systems.
Establishment of Microorganisms in the Flow-Through Rhizosphere System
[0106] Without necessarily being bound to any particular theory, it is
believed that,
within natural attenuation, a small quantity of bacteria, either anaerobic or
supported by
small scale diffusion of atmospheric oxygen, is responsible for initiating
breakdown of
contaminants in water. The processes described herein include preparation of a
test
bioreactor container which includes the wetland plant rhizosphere soil matrix
with an
initially- expected level of bacteria of 102 counts/mL or less. The
contaminated water is
then flowed through the test bioreactor to provide an equilibrium condition
wherein the
bacteria are in consistent contact with the contaminants. Equilibrium may be
evidenced
by confirmation that some level of breakdown of the contaminants is occurring.
An
extract of soil and rhizome representing the rhizosphere is obtained from the
test
bioreactor. This extract is expected to contain microorganisms which were
originally
present in the contaminated water as well as microorganisms originally present
in the
23

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
soil and on and within the rhizome of the wetland plant. This extract is
subjected to
conditions to increase the levels of the microorganisms, such as incubation
and addition
of nutrients. For example, the level of bacteria may be increased from 102
counts/mL to
as much as 109 counts/mL). This extract is referred to herein as "soil
conditioner." The
soil conditioner is then used to treat the soil bed of a large scale
rhizosphere flow
through system prior to planting of the wetland plant into the soil bed. This
ensures that
the soil contains the microorganisms at sufficient levels to provide
relatively high levels
of metabolism of the contaminants during flow through of the contaminated
water to
generate a relatively high rate of degradation of the contaminants.
[0107] The soil matrix provides soil support and mineral nutrients for the
plant and
support material for the soil bacteria and other soil organisms to populate.
The wetland
plants provide a stable secondary rooted structure within the soil that allows
for a high
rate of passage of the water containing the contaminant through the system.
The
wetland plants provide an oxygen supply to the aerobic bacteria and soil
organisms,
whilst the anaerobic organisms are located in areas of the soil bed away from
the
oxygenating root system. Consequently, any contaminant moving through the
system
will experience oxidative and reductive situations as they move through the
system's
wetland plants. One preferred wetland plant used in various embodiments of the

invention is Phragmites australis. This plant is generally regarded as
providing the
greatest root mass and oxygen input.
Alternative Uses of the Soil Conditioner
[0108] Various embodiments of the soil conditioner, prepared under various
conditions
with exposure to various contaminants, will be applicable for treatment of
contaminated
water with various organic contaminants including industrial effluents,
leachates from
landfills and industrial sites, groundwater, tailings ponds and produced water
from
oilfields.
[0109] Various embodiments of the soil conditioner are expected to be
applicable for ex-
situ soil remediation. In this instance, contaminated soils would be used
within the initial
soil growing matrix and the breakdown process described previously for
contaminated
wastewaters would similarly breakdown organic contaminants found within
contaminated
soil.
24

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0110] Various embodiments of the soil conditioner could also be applied in
the field of
in-situ soil remediation, in a way that would be more resilient and robust
than current soil
remediation methods. Current soil remediation methods generally extract a
single
species of microorganism, concentrate it and spray back onto the contaminated
soil/land. However, certain embodiments of the soil conditioner have
concentrated
microorganisms with a more diverse population of species that when applied
would
potentially surpass the treatment potential of current methods as well as
reducing the
requirement for reapplication of the microorganisms onto the contaminated soil
or land.
EXAMPLES
[0111] Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to
the
following example below, which is intended to be illustrative and not
limiting.
Example 1: Treatment of Chlorosolvent Contaminated Groundwater at an
Industrial Site
[0112] The applicant was requested by a national petroleum company to
investigate the
feasibility of using soil based reed beds for the treatment of contaminated
groundwater
within a petrochemical complex. A vinyl chloride production plant was
undergoing
decommissioning and environmental surveys of the site had shown the presence
of 1,2-
dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride within the groundwater. As such, the
petroleum
company required a passive treatment system to remediate the groundwater to
acceptable contaminant levels.
[0113] Prior to undertaking engineering design work, preparatory
investigations were
undertaken to assess site conditions and enable concept design calculations to
be
made. Groundwater contaminant data available from 26 borehole clusters (each
cluster
containing shallow and deep boreholes) was used to model contaminant plumes
for 1,2-
dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride. Trial pits were excavated to assess the
underlying
strata and soil types. Percolation tests were carried out to assess
feasibility for soak-
away based passive discharge. A topographical survey was undertaken to provide
site
levels. A microbial assessment of the groundwater was carried out.

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0114] This initial research indicated that the surface "soils" included
permeable
unconsolidated sand, consistent with the majority of the surrounding coastal
area. Whilst
being extremely suited to a soak-away based discharge, the sand material would
have a
negative effect on the successful implementation of a soil based reed bed
treatment
system, due to the low particle surface area to volume ratio of the sand based
soils.
[0115] Additionally, sand based soils are inert and therefore have a low
presence of
natural bacteria in comparison to the loamy topsoils used within standard soil
based
reed bed technology. The consequence of installing a reed bed treatment system
with a
low startup microbial population is a lengthy establishment phase whilst
bacterial
populations multiply to the required levels for treatment to occur within the
designed
residence time. In order to counter the problems associated with the site
soils, an
alternative methodology to the standard implementation of soil based reed bed
technology was devised and used.
[0116] It was determined that low levels of bacteria existed within the
groundwater
contaminant plume, indicating that contaminant breakdown may be occurring at
minor
quantities within the plume environment. Chemical analysis confirmed the
presence of
contaminant breakdown products, providing further indication that a very low
level of
remediation by bacteria in the groundwater was taking place.
[0117] However, the pedology of the site was found to be dominated by
permeable
unconsolidated sand. There were very few sites available therefore for the
bacteria to
associate with clay or organic matter which would enable them to stabilize and
flourish.
In essence therefore, the rates of natural attenuation/remediation were
extremely low.
[0118] In order to harness the metabolic power of the microorganisms already
present, it
was deemed necessary to increase the population density of these
microorganisms.
[0119] The first step was to expose the reed plants that were to be used, in a
controlled
manner to the contaminated groundwater in a test bioreactor. This was
undertaken
within several duplicated small test systems. This was necessary to: i)
establish that the
contaminated groundwater was not toxic to the strain of reed used; ii)
introduce the
bacterial types present in the contaminated groundwater to the plant
rhizosphere; iii)
26

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
establish a rhizosphere system where the plant root and bacteria are working
symbiotically to produce co-metabolites; and iv) ensure that the bacterial
populations
produced could be established and fixed within the designed soil matrix,
rather than
being transported out under hydraulic flow.
[0120] In situations where the concentrations of contaminants are high and
complex in
mixture, the rates of degradation under natural attenuation will usually be
unacceptably
low, and timescales far too long for genuine remediation to take place without
some
degree of enhancement. This was particularly relevant for this particular
site, where the
composition of the soil was unsuitable for sustaining high microbial counts.
[0121] Therefore a soil mixture was designed to be comprised of the following
components: i) pre-existing site materials, sandy in nature, with the
inorganic
components screened to provide a consistent low particle size, ii) clay
content with a
high cation exchange equivalent, in this case bentonite, and iii) organic
matter containing
humic and fungal material.
[0122] The above components were mixed in varying proportions to create the
matrix to
be used in the test systems. The test systems were comprised of 20 L high-
density
polyethylene boxes, filled with the matrix soil and planted with the selected
reed. Outlet
piping comprised a simple level control so as to retain water within each
individual test
system. The test systems were filled with varying strengths and dilutions of
contaminated groundwater. The water level within the test systems was
maintained 20
mm below soil level throughout the duration of the procedure. The test systems
were
monitored with conventional water quality instrumentation such as pH,
oxidation-
reduction potential (ORP), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Microbial counts
were
periodically taken for the different systems to ensure appropriate development
of
microbial populations.
[0123] After a period of 8 weeks all botanical, biological, chemical and
microbial
indicators were positive, indicating an appropriate point for transition to
the next stage.
[0124] Having carried out the trials and successfully created a soil
rhizosphere rich in
bacteria, a portion of the soil rhizosphere matrix was extracted and
homogenized. The
27

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
homogenizing reduces plant material inside and outside the rhizome wall to
fine particle
size and also releases sugars from the rhizsosphere into solution. The
solution was then
boosted with nutrients and fermented in a closed glass vessel at a temperature
of
approximately 30 C for a minimum period of 5 days. The microorganism count
after this
period had increased dramatically and the solution was considered ready for
use as a
soil conditioner. The stability of the soil material remains constant for
approximately 1
month, if stored out of direct sunlight and below 20 C.
[0125] A dilution of 100:1 of the soil conditioner was prepared with deionized
water and
applied to a series of temporary lagoons which housed potted reed stock of
Phragmites
australis, within an on-site nursery. The contaminated water was flowed
through the
arrangement of pots containing the plants in the lagoon. The temporary lagoons
were
maintained over a period of 1 month prior to transplantation of the reeds into
a soil-
based system. It is to be understood that although this step of using
temporary lagoons
is included in the present example, it may not be required in all cases.
[0126] In addition, a dilution of 100:1 of the soil conditioner was prepared
with deionized
water and applied via a spray applicator to all soils during the mixing
process. This was
carried out immediately prior to placement of the soils within the system and
prior to
planting of the reeds in the soil.
[0127] The flow of contaminated water and configuration of reed beds used in
this
example is illustrated in Figure 2. Contaminated groundwater was pumped from
extraction wells located at the hydraulic barrier of the industrial site (16
extraction wells
producing a total of 160 m2/day) and also pumped from extraction wells located
within
the known underground plume of contaminants (3 wells producing a total of 140
m2/day).
[0128] The extracted contaminated groundwater was then conveyed to a
groundwater
collection tank. A flow of the contaminated groundwater from the groundwater
collection
tank was established and split into four inlet conduits for entry into four
separate identical
reed beds (labelled A to D in Figure 2), each having a soil depth between
about 0.4 m to
about 0.5 M. At this depth of soil, the flow of water is generally horizontal
from the inlet to
the outlet and the metabolism of contaminants by the established
microorganisms
occurs predominately via aerobic metabolic pathways. This represents Phase 1
of this
28

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
particular process. In Phase 2, water treated by the horizontal beds A-D is
conveyed
from outlets in these beds to corresponding vertical beds E-H, each having a
soil depth
between about 0.8 to about 1.0 m. At this depth of soil, the flow of water is
generally
vertical from the inlet to the outlet and the metabolism of contaminants by
the
established microorganisms occurs via a combination of aerobic and anaerobic
metabolic pathways, wherein anaerobic metabolism will be more likely to occur
at
locations near the bottom of the vertical reed beds. This represents Phase 2
of this
particular process. It is to be understood that while the present example
employs a two-
phase treatment process, depending on the class of contaminant and the
microorganisms in the rhizosphere, it may be possible to sufficiently
decontaminate
water using only a single phase treatment process. In other situations, more
than two
phases may be required. The molecular complexity of any individual contaminant
and
the types of biochemical reactions required to metabolize it are expected to
represent
important factors in the resulting complexity of the flow-through rhizosphere
system.
[0129] After treatment in the Phase 2 vertical reed beds (E-H), in this
particular
example, the treated water is conveyed to corresponding retention ponds (I-L).
The
provision of corresponding retention ponds provides a margin of safety in the
event that
an individual upstream reed bed fails for any reason to decontaminate the
contaminated
water to a sufficient level. Each retention pond may be tested separately to
confirm that
sufficient decontamination has occurred before ultimately releasing its
treated water into
a soak-away discharge container M.
[0130] In Figure 2, a recirculation line is shown extending from the soak-away
discharge
inlet back to the main inlet to the horizontal beds. Such a recirculation line
could also be
provided to one of the individual horizontal bed inlets, in order to repeat
the treatment
steps if desired.
[0131] Figure 3 is a perspective illustration of water flow through a two-
phase treatment
system 10, showing flow of contaminated water to horizontal bed D and
subsequently
through the corresponding vertical bed H, as would be provided in the flow
scheme of
Figure 2. While the presence of plants is shown, their rhizomes are omitted in
an attempt
to preserve clarity but should be understood to be present. Horizontal inlet
12 bifurcates
into two arms above the soil level in horizontal bed D and disperses
contaminated water
29

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
onto the surface of the soil where it then moves generally horizontally across
the bed D.
The contaminants are subjected to metabolism by primarily aerobic metabolic
pathways
and the water collects in a collector conduit 13 and flows to the horizontal
bed outlet 14.
The horizontal bed outlet 14 joins the vertical bed inlet 16 which is split
into three arms to
disperse the partially treated water onto the soil of the vertical bed H
(which is about
twice the depth of the horizontal bed D). The water percolates downward within
the soil
bed with remaining contaminants and/or metabolites thereof are further
processed by
aerobic and anaerobic metabolic pathways. Near the bottom of vertical bed
enters a
series of four collector conduits 17, which extend to the vertical bed outlet
18. The
treated water is then sent to retention pond L.
[0132] Figure 4 illustrates a plan view of the large scale modular system used
to treat
the contaminated groundwater. The system includes a battery of reed beds
including
four horizontal beds A-D, four corresponding vertical beds E-H, four
corresponding
retention ponds I-L and a single soak away pond M. Also shown are the main
horizontal
bed inlet 12, collector conduit 13, horizontal bed outlet 14, vertical bed
inlets 16, collector
conduits 17 and vertical bed outlet 18 which extends to retention pond M.
Labelling of
inlets, outlets and conduits in the remaining six beds is omitted in an effort
to preserve
clarity. It is to be understood however, that in this particular example, all
horizontal beds
are substantially identical to each other with similar inlets, outlets and
conduits and all
vertical beds are likewise substantially identical to each other with similar
inlets, outlets
and conduits.
[0133] Upon introduction of the feed of contaminated water into the large-
scale soil-
based flow-through rhizosphere system, monitoring of concentration levels
(mg/L) of 1,2-
dichloroethylene was conducted at the point of system feed (prior to
treatment), the
phase 1 outlet (treatment with horizontal beds only) and final discharge
(sequential
treatment with horizontal and vertical beds). The raw data are listed in Table
1 below
with average concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethylene presented on the last line
of the
table. The data are also presented as linear plots in Figures 5-7.
Table 1: Raw Data ¨ Concentrations of 1,2-Dichloroethylene

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028 PCT/CA2018/051563
Date System Feed Phase 1 Outlet Final Discharge
(mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
18/07/2016 118.38 36.83 6.3
19/07/2016 108.12 36.05 4.96
20/07/2016 109.87 23.12 1.37
21/07/2016 115.57 21.14 1.16
22/07/2016 102.26 18.15 3.78
23/07/2016 112.52 16.39 2.62
24/07/2016 103.54 14.56 5.69
25/07/2016 131.09 9.82 2.13
26/07/2016 99.15 11.6 2.55
27/07/2016 97.74 16.5 2.11
28/07/2016 143.01 11.95 0.59
29/07/2016 118.46 13.77 0.51
30/07/2016 110.6 11.99 2.18
31/07/2016 121.78 12.56 1.8
01/08/2016 139.21 4.4 0.45
02/08/2016 100.82 13.32 0.18
03/08/2016 109.94 9.93 0.45
04/08/2016 104.65 12.05 0.18
05/08/2016 110.96 2.74 0.9
06/08/2016 117.08 5.34 0.67
07/08/2016 113.35 7.73 5.02
08/08/2016 136.01 8.89 1.84
09/08/2016 104.84 9.82 6.29
10/08/2016 122.85 5.27 0.62
11/08/2016 125.76 5.65 3.52
12/08/2016 140.05 12.52 0.1
14/08/2016 112.52 7.55 1.42
15/08/2016 115.58 11.76 1.52
16/08/2016 127.37 9.85 1.76
17/08/2016 102.47 8.04 1.24
18/08/2016 107.42 14.36 1.01
19/08/2016 103.69 13.28 0.75
20/08/2016 98.72 9.42 3.83
21/08/2016 118.25 8.77 3.53
22/08/2016 148.89 8.92 4.44
23/08/2016 122.86 7.07 0.62
24/08/2016 94.61 4.73 0.23
31

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
25/08/2016 92.66 12.7 3.41
26/08/2016 123.82 10.31 4.03
27/08/2016 128.83 7.96 1.03
28/08/2016 152.52 12.73 6.47
29/08/2016 142.35 16.37 4.84
30/08/2016 138.2 17.27 4.23
31/08/2016 153.63 3.88 0.83
01/09/2016 128.91 2.15 0.48
02/09/2016 117.17 13.24 0.68
03/09/2016 173.69 14.58 0.53
04/09/2016 147.54 14.02 2.8
05/09/2016 129.79 12.57 2.71
06/09/2016 123.52 11.55 2.46
07/09/2016 125.37 10.79 1.7
08/09/2016 125.84 7.04 0.01
09/09/2016 123.53 6.63 0.01
10/09/2016 123.43 6.48 0.01
11/09/2016 155.27 18.81 4.96
12/09/2016 150.1 19.48 2.28
13/09/2016 148.68 6.87 8.76
14/09/2016 119.27 15.3 5.15
15/09/2016 134.35 10.81 2.78
16/09/2016 138.95 15.18 4.83
17/09/2016 172.23 14.76 1.39
18/09/2016 127.89 6.99 0.35
19/09/2016 100.7 12.27 0.33
20/09/2016 115.73 2.49 0.01
21/09/2016 116.22 3.19 0.14
23/09/2016 109.82 3.41 0.68
24/09/2016 159.42 12.23 5.72
Avg. Conc. 124.2 11.58 2.25
[0134] The results indicate immediate and substantial reductions of 1,2-
dichloroethylene
by the system. Throughout the course of the performance test, treatment phase
1
provided an average contaminant reduction of 93.5%. When combined with
treatment
phase 2, the average contaminant reduction increased to 98.7%.
32

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0135] Figure 5 shows linear plots comparing the sample analysis results
measured at
the untreated groundwater feed, the phase 1 treatment outlet and the final
discharge
outlet.
[0136] Figure 6 shows linear plots comparing the sample analysis results on a
reduced
Y-axis for the phase 1 treatment outlet and the final discharge outlet.
[0137] Figure 7 shows linear plots indicating percentage containment load
reduction
through treatment phase 1 and phase 2.
[0138] Upon commencing the performance test, contaminant removal through the
first
phase of treatment began at 79% and over the course of the first 4 days
increased to
90%. Contaminant removal through the combined phases 1 and 2 of the treatment
system began at 97%, and continued with greater than 95% contaminant removal.
[0139] The timeframe results show a distinct improvement when compared to
standard
soil based reed beds, where system commissioning can be expected to produce a
40-
60% reduction in contaminant loading and with greater than 90% contaminant
removal
only being reached after a 1-4 month period, depending on the contaminant type
and
load.
[0140] The data obtained in this study indicates that using the described
methodology,
useful microbial populations can be developed on the surfaces of inherently
inert media.
Conventional soil reed beds, whilst ultimately achieving the same level of
treatment via
bacterial complexity and population, can take a sustained period of
establishment and
development to reach the ultimate treatment targets. As such, this period of
development is restrictive in project implementation and economics. The study
has
shown that the described methodology provides an enhancement to rates of
microbial
population, and as such acceleration of the establishment and development of
the
treatment.
[0141] The process steps described in this example provide accelerated
development of
microbial populations, therefore ensuring that start up periods for treatment
are not
protracted and compare favorably with mechanical based systems.
33

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0142] An inherent benefit of the methodology is that the breakdown of
contaminants is
very broad spectrum, meaning that a wide array of contaminants can be broken
down
within the same system at the same time. This is a substantial advancement
over
conventional bioremediation methodologies.
Example 2: Treatment of Soil Contaminated with Pesticides, Emulsifying Oils
and
Other Chemicals at an Industrial Site
[0143] The applicant was requested to investigate and propose a methodology
for
reclamation of land at a former pesticide manufacturing facility. In addition
to historic
contamination by manufacturing activity, a catastrophic fire had produced
widespread
contamination from a broad range of pesticides, emulsifying oils and other
chemicals.
The contamination was spread over a wide area and had penetrated into the
aquifer
underlying the site.
[0144] The statutory authorities required not only a clean up of surface soil
within the
site but also a strategy for decontamination of the contaminant plume lying
below the
site in the aquifer.
[0145] A total of 4,500 tons of severely contaminated soil was first excavated
from the
site and decontaminated using thermal desorption. However, a lower lying area
of the
site was located above the aquifer and excavation below 1.5m was not allowed
for fear
that the disturbance would release a high level of contaminants into the
aquifer. Instead
samples of the soil were removed for initial testing. This contaminated soil
was mixed
with clean soil to give a series of 0%, 20% and 50% blended soils which were
then
planted in boxes with Phragmites australis. Contaminated water from the site,
containing
a small population of bacteria, was then used to irrigate the planted boxes
for a period of
five weeks on a recirculation system.
[0146] The concentration of contaminants in the site water was recorded at the
start of
the trials and then the final concentration after five weeks was recorded. The

concentrations were corrected for variation in the soil blends.
34

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
[0147] The analysis showed quite clearly that the complex chemical mixture was
being
degraded and simple plate counts of bacteria indicated that greater numbers
and
varieties of bacteria had developed during the process.
[0148] The rhizosphere containing plant roots, soil, and soil microbiology
were
homogenized and the aqueous extract was fermented to produce a concentrate of
the
rhizosphere microorganisms. This material was taken back to site and sprayed
onto the
remaining layers of contaminated soil. The initial sampling of the area showed
a
variation of between 800 and 1000 mg/kg of total pesticide concentration plus
other
organic materials. The target required by the Statutory Authorities was less
than 10
mg/kg. This target was achieved with final concentrations of 1.82 to 1.95
mg/kg and the
decontaminated site was released for construction of a new housing
development.
[0149] Table 2 provides data indicating percentage reduction of a series of
contaminants from soil remediated in the present example.
Table 2: Soil Remediation Results after Treating Contaminated Soil with Soil
Conditioner
Parameter Measured Maximum Maximum
Average Percentage
(concentration or other Indicator Value at Percentage
Reduction
indicator Value) Beginning Reduction
ammonia (ppm) 180 100 87
anionic detergents (ppm) 21000 93 88
chemical oxygen demand
33000 95 90
(ppm)
color (color units) 1800 74 72
oils and grease (ppm) 120 99 87
cypermethrin (ppb) 13 100 100
diazinon (ppb) 15 100 100
dichlofenthion (ppb) 5 100 100

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
dieldrin (ppb) 1 100 100
endrin (ppb) 1.3 100 98
lindane (ppb) 1.1 100 99
mothproofer agent (ppb) 23 100 96
p-p'-DDT (ppb) 5 100 100
permethrin (ppb) 118 100 98
propetamphos (ppb) 36 95 78
trans-chlorfenvin phos 100
9 83
(ppb)
[0150] This methodology generates a soil conditioner concentrate containing
single and
co-metabolic systems amongst other species of soil organism and generates
results
which appear to be more efficient than presently used processes for soil
bioremediation.
Equivalents and Scope
[0151] Other than described herein, or unless otherwise expressly specified,
all of the
numerical ranges, amounts, values and percentages, such as those for amounts
of
materials, elemental contents, times and temperatures, ratios of amounts, and
others, in
the following portion of the specification and attached claims may be read as
if prefaced
by the word "about" even though the term "about" may not expressly appear with
the
value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the
numerical
parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are
approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to
be
obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to
limit the
application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each
numerical
parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported
significant
digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
[0152] Any patent, publication, internet site, or other disclosure material,
in whole or in
part, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein is incorporated
herein only to the
36

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing
definitions,
statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As
such, and to the
extent necessary, the disclosure as explicitly set forth herein supersedes any
conflicting
material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof,
that is said to
be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing
definitions,
statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein will only be
incorporated to the
extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the
existing
disclosure material.
[0153] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used
herein have the
same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to
which this
invention belongs.
[0154] While this invention has been particularly shown and described with
references
to embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that
various
changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the
scope of
the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
[0155] In the claims, articles such as "a," "an," and "the" may mean one or
more than
one unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context.
Claims or
descriptions that include "or" between one or more members of a group are
considered
satisfied if one, more than one, or all of the group members are present in,
employed in,
or otherwise relevant to a given product or process unless indicated to the
contrary or
otherwise evident from the context.
[0156] It is also noted that the term "comprising" is intended to be open and
permits but
does not require the inclusion of additional elements or steps. When the term
"comprising" is used herein, the term "consisting of' is thus also encompassed
and
disclosed. Where ranges are given, endpoints are included. Furthermore, it is
to be
understood that unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the
context and
understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art, values that are expressed
as ranges can
assume any specific value or subrange within the stated ranges in different
embodiments of the invention, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of
the range,
unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Where the term "about" is used,
it is
37

CA 03085192 2020-06-09
WO 2019/134028
PCT/CA2018/051563
understood to reflect +1- 10% of the recited value. In addition, it is to be
understood that
any particular embodiment of the present invention that falls within the prior
art may be
explicitly excluded from any one or more of the claims. Since such embodiments
are
deemed to be known to one of ordinary skill in the art, they may be excluded
even if the
exclusion is not set forth explicitly herein.
38

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2024-04-02
(86) PCT Filing Date 2018-12-06
(87) PCT Publication Date 2019-07-11
(85) National Entry 2020-06-09
Examination Requested 2022-09-15

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $100.00 was received on 2023-11-07


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-12-06 $100.00
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-12-06 $277.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee 2020-06-09 $200.00 2020-06-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2020-12-07 $50.00 2020-12-01
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2021-12-06 $50.00 2021-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2022-12-06 $50.00 2022-09-09
Request for Examination 2023-12-06 $100.00 2022-09-15
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2023-12-06 $100.00 2023-11-07
Registration of a document - section 124 2024-02-13 $125.00 2024-02-13
Registration of a document - section 124 2024-02-13 $125.00 2024-02-13
Final Fee $169.00 2024-02-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
REED SCIENTIFIC CO. LTD.
Past Owners on Record
REED SCIENTIFIC SERVICES LTD.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2020-06-09 2 83
Claims 2020-06-09 6 199
Drawings 2020-06-09 7 343
Description 2020-06-09 38 1,722
Representative Drawing 2020-06-09 1 28
International Search Report 2020-06-09 2 81
Declaration 2020-06-09 1 11
National Entry Request 2020-06-09 7 211
Cover Page 2020-08-12 1 53
Change of Agent 2021-11-23 4 89
Office Letter 2021-12-23 1 194
Office Letter 2021-12-23 1 197
Maintenance Fee Payment 2022-09-09 1 33
Request for Examination / Amendment / Special Order 2022-09-15 16 546
Claims 2022-09-15 4 220
Description 2022-09-15 38 2,574
Special Order - Green Granted 2022-11-02 1 196
Examiner Requisition 2022-11-23 5 303
Amendment 2023-03-20 26 1,363
Claims 2023-03-20 4 217
Examiner Requisition 2023-04-12 5 278
Final Fee 2024-02-21 3 73
Representative Drawing 2024-03-05 1 18
Amendment 2023-08-03 18 647
Claims 2023-08-03 4 224
Examiner Requisition 2023-09-22 4 244
Amendment 2023-10-25 6 140
Claims 2023-10-25 3 160
Maintenance Fee Payment 2023-11-07 1 33