Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2348320 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web à été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fournit par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2348320
(54) Titre français: METHODE D'ANALYSE MODALE ET APPAREIL CONNEXE
(54) Titre anglais: MODAL ANALYSIS METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • G01M 7/02 (2006.01)
  • G01M 7/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • THOMAS, MARC (Canada)
  • LAVILLE, FREDERIC (Canada)
  • LAFLEUR, FRANCOIS (Canada)
(73) Titulaires :
  • CENTRE DE RECHERCHE INDUSTRIELLE DU QUEBEC (Canada)
(71) Demandeurs :
  • CENTRE DE RECHERCHE INDUSTRIELLE DU QUEBEC (Canada)
(74) Agent: FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2006-01-17
(22) Date de dépôt: 2001-05-18
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2002-11-18
Requête d'examen: 2002-11-13
Licence disponible: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande: S.O.

Abrégés

Abrégé français

Méthode d'analyse modale et appareil connexe pour déterminer selon une méthode acoustique les caractéristiques dynamiques de vibrations d'une structure, y compris les fréquences naturelles, les formes d'un mode et facteurs d'amortissement, basée sur un modèle Entrées multiples sortie unique (MISO). La méthode et l'appareil impliquent la génération d'un signal d'excitation acoustique vers n emplacements répartis dans l'espace associés avec la structure alors que ce dernier est maintenu pour permettre la vibration de celui-ci, un de ces emplacements étant choisi comme un emplacement de référence. Une série de microphones sont disposés aux emplacements pour produire m ensembles complémentaires de n signaux électriques liés à la pression acoustique d'entrée, l'un de ceux-ci étant choisi comme signal de référence associé avec l'emplacement de référence. Une analyse Fourier est effectuée sur les ensembles des signaux électriques liés à la pression acoustique d'entrée pour fournir les ensembles correspondants de données liées à la pression d'entrée corrélée dans le domaine de la fréquence comportant les données de référence associées avec le signal de référence. Un transducteur de vibrations, tel un accéléromètre, est utilisé pour capter des vibrations de sortie induites en réponse à l'excitation acoustique à un point de référence sur la structure excitée correspondant à l'emplacement de référence pour produire m ensembles complémentaires de signaux électriques de réponse de vibration de sortie, qui sont ensuite convertis par l'analyse Fourier en des ensembles correspondants de données de réponse de vibrations de sortie dans le domaine de la fréquence. Puis, à partir des relations entre m ensembles complémentaires correspondants de n fonctions de transfert d'entrée caractérisant la corrélation entre chaque ensemble de données acoustiques liées à la pression et les données de référence d'une part, et m ensembles de données de réponse de vibration de sortie d'autre part, les fonctions de transfert structurel caractérisant chacun des dits ensembles de données liées à la pression acoustique d'entrée sont obtenues. Enfin, les caractéristiques vibratoires dynamiques de la structure excitée de manière acoustique sont dérivées des fonctions de transfert structurelles obtenues par les techniques de calcul usuelles.


Abrégé anglais

A modal analysis method and apparatus for acoustically determining dynamic vibration characteristics of a structure, including natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping factors, is based on a Multiple-Input-Single-Output (MISO) model. The method and apparatus involve generation of an acoustic excitation signal toward n spatially distributed locations associated with the structure while the latter is held to allow vibration thereof, one of the locations being chosen as a reference location. A series of microphones are disposed at the locations to produce m complementary sets of n input acoustic pressure-related electrical signals, one of these being chosen as a reference signal associated with the reference location. A Fourier analysis is performed on the sets of input acoustic pressure-related electrical signals to provide corresponding sets of correlated input acoustic pressure-related data in the frequency domain including reference data associated with the reference signal. A vibration transducer such as an accelerometer is used to sense induced output vibration in response to the acoustic excitation at a reference point on the excited structure corresponding to the reference location to produce m complementary sets of output vibration response electrical signals, which are then converted through Fourier analysis into corresponding sets of output vibration response data in the frequency domain. Then, from relations between m corresponding complementary sets of n input transfer functions characterizing the correlation between each set of input acoustic pressure-related data and the reference data from one hand, and m sets of output vibration response data on the other hand, the structural transfer functions characterizing each said set of input acoustic pressure- related data are obtained. Finally, the dynamic vibratory characteristics of the acoustically excited structure are derived from the resulting structural transfer functions through usual calculation techniques.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.




14

1. A modal analysis method for determining dynamic vibration
characteristics of a structure under acoustic excitation, said method
comprising
the steps of:
providing m complementary sets of correlated input acoustic pressure-
related data in the frequency domain representing m complementary acoustic
excitation signals, all said sets of data being provided according to n
spatially
distributed locations associated with the structure with m>n , each said set
including reference input acoustic pressure-related data provided according to
a
reference one of said locations;
providing m corresponding complementary sets of output vibration data in
the frequency domain in response to said acoustic excitation at a reference
point
on the excited structure corresponding to the reference location;
providing m corresponding complementary sets of n input transfer
functions characterizing the correlation between each said set of input
acoustic
pressure-related data and the reference input acoustic pressure-related data;
obtaining n structural transfer functions characterizing each said set of
input acoustic pressure-related data from relations between said m sets of n
input transfer functions and said m sets of output vibration response data;
and
deriving from the structural transfer functions the dynamic vibratory
characteristics of the acoustically excited structure.
2. A modal analysis method for acoustically determining dynamic
vibration characteristics of a structure, said method comprising the steps of:
a) generating an acoustic excitation signal toward n spatially distributed
locations associated with the structure while the latter is held to allow
vibration
thereof, one of said locations being a reference location;
b) sensing the acoustic excitation signal at said locations to produce a
corresponding set of n correlated input acoustic pressure-related electrical



15

signals, one of said electrical signals being a reference signal associated
with
said reference location;
c) converting said set of n correlated input acoustic pressure-related
electrical signals into a set of correlated input acoustic pressure-related
data in
the frequency domain including reference data associated with said reference
signal;
d) sensing induced output vibration in response to said acoustic excitation
at a reference point on the excited structure corresponding to the reference
location to produce an output vibration response electrical signal;
e) converting said output vibration response electrical signal into a set of
output vibration response data in the frequency domain;
f) providing a set of n input transfer functions characterizing the
correlation between said input acoustic pressure-related data and the
reference
data;
g) performing said steps a) to f) for m-1 complementary acoustic
excitation signals with m>=n , to produce m-1 complementary sets of
input
acoustic pressure-related data and to produce m-1 complementary sets of output
response vibration data;
h) obtaining n structural transfer functions characterizing each said set of
input acoustic pressure-related data from relations between said m sets of n
input transfer functions and said m sets of output vibration response data;
and
i) deriving from the structural transfer functions the dynamic vibratory
characteristics of the structure.
3. A modal analysis apparatus for determining dynamic vibration
characteristics of a structure, comprising:
acoustical source means capable of generating m complementary sets of
correlated acoustic excitation signals toward n spatially distributed
locations
associated with the structure, one of said locations being a reference
location;


16

a structure holder provided with attachment means for holding the
structure while allowing thereof to vibrate under said acoustic excitation
signals;
acoustic sensor means responsive to the acoustic excitation signal at said
locations to produce m complementary sets of n correlated input acoustic
pressure-related electrical signals, one of said electrical signals being a
reference signal associated with said reference location;
Fourier transform means for converting said sets of correlated input
acoustic pressure-related electrical signals into sets of correlated input
acoustic
pressure-related data in the frequency domain including reference data
associated with said reference signal;
vibration sensing means responsive to induced output vibration in
response to said acoustic excitation at a reference point on the excited
structure
corresponding to the reference location to produce m complementary output
vibration electrical signals;
Fourier transform means for converting said output vibration electrical
signals into m sets of output vibration data in the frequency domain; and
data processor means responsive to said sets of correlated input acoustic
pressure-related data and to said sets of output vibration data for providing
n
input transfer functions characterizing the correlation between each said set
of
acoustic pressure-related data and the reference data, for obtaining n
structural
transfer functions characterizing each said set of input acoustic pressure-
related
electrical data from relations between said m sets of n input transfer
functions
and said m sets of output vibration response data, and for deriving from the
structural transfer functions the dynamic vibratory characteristics of the
structure.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.



CA 02348320 2001-05-18
MODAL ANALYSIS METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to modal analysis of a structure for
determining dynamic vibratory characteristics thereof, and more particularly
to
modal analysis method and apparatus using acoustical excitation to impart
vibration to the structure under test.
Brief descriation of the prior art
Modal analysis techniques have been recently applied to many vibratory
testing applications, and particularly in Environmental Stress Screening (ESS)
tests such as those performed in printed circuit boards (PCB's) manufacturing
as
part of quality control procedures.
According to conventional ESS procedures for testing PCB's,
determination of the vibration spectrum required for testing a particular PCB
is
usually an empirical matter. Induced fatigue and precipitation of latent
defects are
generally not estimated considering the actual stress within the circuit, but
are
rather empirically estimated from the vibration level as measured. Types of
defects that are precipitated with a stimulation using random vibrations are
mainly related to poor solders, component or substrate defects, connector
problems, poor securing of cables and components, and structural problems.
Methods of determining the spectrum of a vibrating excitation typically range
from
the study of vibrating behavior with comparison of the global response to
predetermined optimum vibration levels, to the use of spectrums previously
employed with success for other similar products. An intermediary method
consists of introducing typical defects in a product and then increasing the
vibration level until these defects repetitively precipitate, which method
requires
to apply long-continued vibrating stimulation, typically of about 10 minutes
or
more. In order to improve efficiency over these known methods, a structural
model characterizing the vibration response of a product can be build prior to


CA 02348320 2001-05-18
2
determine the spectrum of vibrating stimulation likely to produce the target
frequency response profile. For this purpose, modal analysis techniques are
used, such as those described in the applicants' papers " Modal analysis of
electronic circuit using acoustical sources ", 4t" Annual IEEE Accelerated
Stress
Testing, 1998, and "Experimental modal analysis using acoustical sources ", 1
Tn
Canadian Congress on Applied Mechanics, 1999. Modal analysis essentially
consists in establishing a theoretical model in terms of vibration parameters
including resonance frequencies and damping factor associated with main
modes of vibration. Then, values of these vibration parameters are determined
experimentally using either a mechanical or acoustical source of vibration,
such
as disclosed in the inventor's prior International PCT application no. WO
01/01103 to the applicants as published on Jan. 4, 2001, along with
conventional
vibration measuring instrumentation. From the obtained vibration parameters
values, vibrating stimulation levels required to comply with ESS testing
requirements can be predicted as well as optimal vibration spectrums. Acoustic
excitation is a very attractive, non-contact approach for excitation of
flexible
structures. Unfortunately, an acoustical source does not produce a localized
force on the structure under test, and therefore a plurality of vibration
transducers
(accelerometers) directly mounted on the article under test have been required
heretofore, such as taught in the above-cited publications from the
applicants. A
complex set-up of transducers and cables must be realized to perform modal
analysis of a specific structure to be tested, implying time-consuming
calibration
procedures.
Summary of the invention
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an acoustic-
based modal analysis method and apparatus for determining dynamic vibration
characteristics of a structure, which minimizes the number of output vibration
transducers required.


CA 02348320 2001-05-18
3
According to the above object, from a broad aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a modal analysis method for determining dynamic
vibration characteristics of a structure under acoustic excitation. The method
comprises a first step of providing nt complementary sets of correlated input
acoustic pressure-related data in the frequency domain representing m
complementary acoustic excitation signals, all sets of data being provided
according to n spatially distributed locations associated with the structure
with
m>_n , each set including reference input acoustic pressure-related data
provided
according to a reference one of the locations. The method further comprises
steps of providing m corresponding complementary sets of output vibration data
in the frequency domain in response to the acoustic excitation at a reference
point on the excited structure corresponding to the reference location and
providing m corresponding complementary sets of n input transfer functions
characterizing the correlation between each set of input acoustic pressure-
related data and the reference input acoustic pressure-related data. The
method
further comprises steps of obtaining n structural transfer functions
characterizing
each set of input acoustic pressure-related data from relations between the m
sets of n input transfer functions and the m sets of output vibration response
data and deriving from the structural transfer functions the dynamic vibratory
characteristics of the acoustically excited structure.
According to a further broad aspect of the invention, there is provided a
modal analysis method for acoustically determining dynamic vibration
characteristics of a structure, the method comprising steps of: a) generating
an
acoustic excitation signal toward n spatially distributed locations associated
with
the structure while the latter is held to allow vibration thereof, one of said
locations being a reference location; b) sensing the acoustic excitation
signal at
the locations to produce a corresponding set of n correlated input acoustic
pressure-related electrical signals, one of the electrical signals being a
reference
signal associated with the reference location; c) converting the set of n


CA 02348320 2004-12-20
4
correlated input acoustic pressure-related electrical signals into a set of
correlated input acoustic pressure-related data in the frequency domain
including reference data associated with the reference signal; d) sensing
induced output vibration in response to the acoustic excitation at a reference
point on the excited structure corresponding to the reference location to
produce an output vibration response electrical signal; e) converting the
output vibration response electrical signal into a set of output vibration
response data in the frequency domain; f) providing a set of n input transfer
functions characterizing the correlation between the input acoustic pressure-
related data and the reference data; g) performing said steps a) to f) for m-1
complementary acoustic excitation signals with m>_n , to produce m-1
complementary sets of input acoustic pressure-related data and to produce
m-1 complementary sets of output response vibration data; h) obtaining n
structural transfer functions characterizing each set of input acoustic
pressure-related data from relations between the m sets of n input transfer
functions and the m sets of output vibration response data; and i) deriving
from the structural transfer functions the dynamic vibratory characteristics
of
the structure.
According to a still further broad aspect of the invention, there is
provided modal analysis apparatus for determining dynamic vibration
characteristics of a structure. The apparatus comprises acoustical source
means capable of generating m complementary sets of correlated
acoustic excitation signals toward n spatially distributed locations
associated with the structure, one of said locations being a reference
location, and a structure holder provided with attachment means for holding
the structure while allowing thereof to vibrate under the acoustic excitation
signals. The apparatus further comprises acoustic sensor means
responsive to the acoustic excitation signal at the locations to produce m
complementary sets of n correlated input acoustic pressure-related electrical
signals, one of the electrical signals being a reference signal associated


CA 02348320 2004-12-20
4A
with said reference location, and Fourier transform means for converting the
sets
of correlated input acoustic pressure-related electrical signals into sets of


CA 02348320 2001-05-18
correlated input acoustic pressure-related data in the frequency domain
including
reference data associated with the reference signal. The apparatus further
comprises vibration sensing means responsive to induced output vibration in
response to the acoustic excitation at a reference point on the excited
structure
5 corresponding to the reference location to produce m complementary output
vibration electrical signals and Fourier transform means for converting the
output
vibration electrical signals into m sets of output vibration data in the
frequency
domain. The apparatus further comprises data processor means responsive to
the sets of correlated input acoustic pressure-related data and to the sets of
output vibration data for providing n input transfer functions characterizing
the
correlation between each set of acoustic pressure-related data and the
reference
data, for obtaining n structural transfer functions characterizing each set of
input
acoustic pressure-related electrical data from relations between the m sets of
n
input transfer functions and the m sets of output vibration response data, and
for
deriving from the structural transfer functions the dynamic vibratory
characteristics of the structure.
Brief description of the drawinas
Preferred embodiments of a modal analysis method and apparatus
according to the invention will now be described in view of the accompanying
drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a preferred embodiment of a modal analysis
apparatus according to the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a perspective view of a PCB holder and loudspeaker provided on
a preferred embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention;
Fig. 3 is a block diagram of the Multiple-Inputs/Single Output model on
which is based the principle set forth by the invention;
Fig. 4 is a flow chart representing the simulation process performed to
verify performance of the method according to the invention;


CA 02348320 2001-05-18
6
Fig. 5 is a graph showing an example of structural transfer function HAY for
i=2 that has been identified by the method and apparatus of the present
invention;
Fig. 6 is a graph showing an example of amplitude values for a first mode
that has been identified by the method and apparatus of the present invention.
Detailed description of the areferred embodiments
In the present specification, the apparatus and method according the
present invention will be described in view of a particular application
dealing with
PCB's as tested structures. However, it is to be understood that the
application
scope of the present invention is by no means limited to PCB's or like
flexible
structures, but to any other structure for which dynamic vibration
characteristics
has to be determined.
Referring to Fig. 1, the modal analysis apparatus according to the
invention as generally designated at 10 comprises a structure holder 12 having
a
main frame 13 provided with attachment means in the form of a fixture 14
having
adjustable clamps 16 for securing a PCB 18 at a peripheral portion thereof to
allow vibration under acoustic excitation, as will be explained later in
detail. The
fixture 14 is preferably of a similar design as the fixture described in the
above-
cited published international PCT application no. WO 01 /01103 to the
applicants.
As shown in Fig.2, the fixture 14, which is designed to receive a single PCB
18 in
the example shown, comprises a generally rectangular outer frame 15 provided
with a recessed planar portion 17 defining a central opening 19 to be aligned
with
a locating reference pattern 24 printed on a mat 23 or directly on the floor,
by
positioning the legs 21 of main frame 13 accordingly. The clamps 16 are
mounted on fixture planar portion 17, which clamps having mounting blocks 27
that can be locked in a predetermined position along the corresponding sides
of
the frame 15 by set screws 29 extending through corresponding bores provided
on the sides of frame 15, and through corresponding threaded bores provided on
blocks 27. Alternatively, the sides of frame 15 may be provided with elongated

i;
CA 02348320 2002-05-28
4 1
slots (not shown) to allow position adjustment for the blocks 27. Each clamp
16
includes a spring-biased clamping member 31 cooperating through pivot 33 with
a base member 35 having a pair of lateral flanges 37 being rigidly secured to
the
corresponding block 27 with screws 39. To the forward end of each clamping
member 16 is secured a mounting spacer 42 fixed in a position parallel to a
corresponding PCB edge with a set screw 44 vertically extending through the
forward end of clamping member 31. Each mounting block 27 is provided with a
rib (not shown) having an end that is vertically aligned with the mounting
spacer
42 when the clamp is in a lock position, defining a tight space for receiving
and
maintaining the PCB edge adjacent portion. Facing ends of mounting spacers 42
and corresponding ribs are aligned with rubber pads 45 to ensure that the PCB
edge surface is not damaged by the clamps 16 when the latter are brought in a
lock position. The fixture 14 is designed to allow the mounting of a
sufficient
number of clamps 16 located on the periphery of the PCS to allow the latter to
vibrate according to some vibration modes characterizing the structure, as
will be
explained later in more detail.
Turning back to Fig. 1, as part of an acoustical source and disposed under
fixture 14 is an acoustical transducer or loudspeaker 20 to be located at a
stable
position with respect to the locating reference pattern 24, which allows
positioning of the loudspeaker 20 at selected specific locations with
reference to
the central opening 19 of fixture 14, as will be explained later in more
detail. The
acoustical source further includes driver means operatively coupled to
loudspeaker 20, in the form of an audio amplifier 25 responsive to an input
signal, such as a white noise, generated by a signal generator 26. The
apparatus further comprises a set of acoustical sensors in the form of a
plurality
of microphones 28; , with i=l,n , which are disposed at spatially distributed
locations associated with the structure, generally according to a two-
dimensional
configuration. The value for n and the appropriate configuration for the
microphones are dictated by the particular modal analysis to be performed. A


CA 02348320 2001-05-18
g
selected one of microphones 28; identified as 28k is considered as a reference
microphone disposed at a reference location, as will be explained later in
more
detail. Alternatively, a lesser number of microphones can be used by
performing
successive tests with the same microphones relocated at different positions. A
vibration sensor in the form of an accelerometer 38 is disposed at a reference
point on the structure or PCB 18, which reference point is spatially
associated
with the location of reference microphone 28k being vertically aligned with
accelerometer 38. The microphones 28, to 28" are coupled to corresponding n
inputs provided on a conventional conditioning amplifier 32, which also
receives
at input 41 the output vibration signals coming from accelerometer 38. It is
to be
understood that separate conditioning instrumentation for the microphone
signals
and accelerometer signal can also be provided, as well known in the art. The
conditioned outputs of signal conditioning amplifier 32 are fed to
corresponding n
inputs of a Fourier transform converter which is preferably a Fast Fourier
Transform analyzer generating converted data in the frequency domain toward a
data processor device such as computer 40 for further processing.
The principles on which is based the present invention will now be
explained in detail. The non-contact modal analysis technique according to the
invention is based on a particular Multiple Inputs Single Output model (MISO)
using correlated acoustical excitation signals. The mode shapes and modal
parameters of the structure are given by the identification of the Frequency
Response Functions (FRF) obtained by acoustic pressures measurements of the
excitation in the near field of the structure at a predetermined number of
locations
in accordance with the considered number of degrees of freedom, and by a
single acceleration measurement of the structure response. Then, dynamic
vibration characteristics of a structure under test, including natural
frequencies,
mode shapes and damping factors, can be determined using conventional
derivation techniques.

i
CA 02348320 2002-05-28
9
Referring to Fig. 3, a MISO system generally designated at 47 is defined
by the application of several input forces F;(w) with i=1,2,...,k,...,n ,
which forces
F;(w) are in the form of acoustic excitation signals as sensed by microphones
28;
at n spatially distributed locations associated with the structure, which
5 microphones generate correlated input acoustic pressure-related electrical
signals, and by the measurement of a single vibration response Y(a), as sensed
by accelerometer 38 at a reference point on the excited structure. When a set
of
perfectly coherent external acoustic forces F;(w) is applied to the structure
we
can define the input transfer function between a force I and a force j as
being
HF;Fj(w). This relation is expressed as follows by choosing a force Fk(~) as a
reference force associated with a reference location on the structure:
S~~=H~~xS~~
wherin .SFkFi is the cross-spectrum between the reference force Fk(~) and a
force
i, and SFkFk is the auto-spectrum of the reference force Fk(r~). The n input
15 transfer functions HFk~;(~) characterize the correlation between the input
acoustic
pressure-related signal and the reference signal. These input transfer
functions
HFkFn~) depend on the characteristics of the acoustic excitation and vary for
each
acoustic load case a according to the amplitude and phase relations between
the
forces. The dynamic mechanical system is characterized by a series of
structural
transfer function H;Y(w) which are specific to the structure and depend on the
modal parameters. The cross-spectrum between reference force Fk(w) and
response Y(w) is expressed as follows:
,fir ~r S~F
m
We express the total response Y(~) according to Fk(~) in the following way:
Y=~Hrr H~~Fk

I ~. ~ i
CA 02348320 2002-05-28
10
The measurements of each input force F;(w) with i=1,2,...,k,...,n and of the
vibration response Y(tv), expressed as frequency domain data through Fourier
analysis, lead to only one equation with n unknowns which are the structural
transfer functions H;y(w) of the structure, in terms of the n input transfer
functions
5 HFkFi(~) characterizing the correlation between the input acoustic pressure-
related data and the reference data. It is thus necessary to increase the
number
of equations available to m ~ n to be able to derive all H;~.(u~). By exciting
the
structure with complementary load cases with a = a...m and m ~ n and by
measuring each set of forces F;(w) and response Y(a), it is possible to
express
10 the system of relations in matrix form as follows:
Hn~ H~~ a a Her Y Fka
H~r~....HFkFr a
a


H~~ b b b ...H~FHZr Y F~b
H~r~ H~~ . b b


H~~ a ...HF1FH3r Y ~ a
H~~ a a = a~ lFk
Hn~ a


H~i~~m~I~~~m~l~x~~m~ ...H~F~m)H"r Y~myF'x(m)



wherein HF,~;(a) are the input transfer functions between Fk(a) and F; (a) for
the
load case a with a = a,...m.
15 In other words, once a first set of input acoustic pressure-related data
Fk(a) for a first load case a=a is provided with its corresponding set of
output
response vibration data, the same type of data is obtained in a same manner as
explained above for m-1 complementary acoustic excitation signals ,
corresponding to m-1 further load cases with min , to produce m-I
20 complementary sets of input acoustic pressure-related data and m-1
complementary sets of output response vibration data. In practice, a
particular
load case will be associated to a specific position of the loudspeaker 20 with
respect to the reference pattern shown in Fig. 2. It is to be understood that
any
other means to provide a plurality of load cases, such as using a plurality of
25 spatially distributed loudspeakers, are contemplated in practicing the
present
invention. Then, the n structural transfer functions H;y(r~) characterizing
each set


CA 02348320 2004-12-20
11
of input acoustic pressure-related data can be obtained from a system of
relations between the m sets of n input transfer functions and the m sets of
output vibration response data. The system of relations can be easily solved
by
any appropriate technique such as inversing or pseudo-inversing techniques if
m
> n to obtain:
{H~r~,~t~=~H~F(a~~,~m~~F~Y(a~k(a~~~~~.ra
where FRF is the vector (m x 1) containing the FRF between the force Fk(a)
with
a=a,..m, and the acoustic response of the system Y(a). More specifically, the
above system can be solved to identify the n structural transfer function Hey
where m = n H ~~.r a = Z ~,~, ~FRF ~m
where m ) n H ~.~ o = P~~;, ~ Z~'"~", ~ FRF ~m
wherein:
R~> = Z~',~m~ Zc"~n>
Once the H;Y are obtained for each frequency, the n first mode shapes of the
system with associated natural frequencies and damping factors can be derived
using any usual techniques, such a peak amplitude method, as described by
D.J . Ewins, « Modal Testing : Theory and practice », Research Studies Press,
1984. There exist a number of modal analysis methods which, although different
in their detail, all share the same basic assumption: namely, that in the
vicinity of
a resonance the total response is dominated by the contribution of the mode
whose natural frequency is closest. The methods vary as to whether they
assume that all the response is attributed to that single mode or whether the
other modes' contributions are represented by a simple approximation. The


CA 02348320 2004-12-20
12
simplest of these methods is one which has been used for a long time and which
is sometimes referred to as the peal-amplitude or peak-picking method. This is
a
method which works adequately for structures whose FRF exhibit well-separated
modes which are not so lightly-damped that accurate measurements at
30 resonance are difficult to obtain but which, on the other hand, are not so
heavily
damped that the response at a resonance is strongly influenced by more than
one mode. Although this appears to limit the applicability of the method, it
should
be noted that in the more difficult cases, such an approach can be useful in
obtaining initial estimates to the parameters required, thereby speeding up
the
35 more general curve-fitting procedures described later. The method is
applied as
follows:
(i) first, individual resonance peaks are detected on the FRF plot,
corresponding to mathematical expression (2) above, and the frequency of
maximum response taken as the natural frequency of that mode ~x ;
40 (ii) second, the maximum value of the FRF is noted I&I and the frequency
bandwidth 0~ of the function for a response level of ~~2 is determined. The
two points thus identified as rr~ and r.~ are the half-power points;
(iii) The hysteretic damping loss factor of the mode in question can now be
estimated from the following formulae:
45 ~''-~C~2-~f'2~ =0 /Ctk
which damping loss factor r~. is related to the damping factor by a factor 2
as
shown in equation (3) below;
(iv) Last, we may consider ~al as an estimate for the modal constant of the
mode being analyzed, corresponding to or mode shape as expressed by
50 equation (10) above, by assuming that the total response in this resonant
region
is attributed to a single term in the general FRF series.


CA 02348320 2004-12-20
12A
The method according to the invention has been proven through numerical
simulation performed on a plate with simply supported boundary conditions
using
a number of load cases m=n=7, i.e. considering seven (7) acoustic excitation
locations p1 to p~ associated with the structure as shown in the graph of Fig.
6,
and according to a simulation process illustrated on Fig. 4. Input forces
F;(~) with
i=1,2,...,k,...,n are calculated at step 50 according to a point source
radiation
model as well known in the art, to provide the m complementary sets of
correlated input acoustic pressure-related data in the frequency domain
representing m complementary acoustic excitation signals. At step 52, The
first
natural frequencies ~",m and mode shapes are obtained with an analytical plate
model defined from, plate thickness, late length, plate width, Young's modulus
material density of the plate, Poisson's coefficient, and parameters related
to the material properties of the plate. The damping factor can be calculated
as
follows:
2~
wherein 0~ is the frequency bandwidth corresponding to half of natural
frequency amplitude. Then, at following step 54, a usual modal superposition
algorithm is applied to derive the theoretical structural transfer functions f-
l~;Y(~)
as well as the vibration response Y(~) of the structure.

~ i. ~ ~ i
CA 02348320 2002-05-28 .w
13
At following step 56, the MISO model with coherent excitations is used to
determine the mode shapes and the structural transfer functions H;~.(w) of the
plate according to the model of the invention. As shown in Fig. 5 wherein both
theoretical and modeled structural transfer functions i-1~2v(~),H2~~(~) are
plotted for
the 0 - 400 Hz frequency range, it can be seen that both curves mutually
correspond in amplitude and frequency in the area of the natural or resonance
frequencies. Fig. 6 shows a mode shape comparison for the first resonance
frequency of the plate, wherein amplitude values associated with the seven (7)
excitation locations pi to pl were used along with boundary conditions to
interpolate amplitude values associated with p8 and p9 . Then, a validation of
the
MISO modeling is performed at step 58, wherein a Mode Assurance Criteria
(MAC) analysis between the theoretical and modeled mode shapes, as described
in D.J . Ewins, « Modal Testing : Theory and practice » Research Studies
Press,
19&4, yields to MAC=1 fo all seven (7) identified mode shapes, thus indicating
a
perfect mode shape ident~cation using the model according to the invention.

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , États administratifs , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

États administratifs

Titre Date
Date de délivrance prévu 2006-01-17
(22) Dépôt 2001-05-18
Requête d'examen 2002-11-13
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public 2002-11-18
(45) Délivré 2006-01-17
Expiré 2021-05-18

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Historique des paiements

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Montant payé Date payée
Le dépôt d'une demande de brevet 300,00 $ 2001-05-18
Enregistrement de documents 100,00 $ 2001-11-07
Enregistrement de documents 100,00 $ 2001-11-09
Enregistrement de documents 100,00 $ 2001-11-09
Requête d'examen 400,00 $ 2002-11-13
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 2 2003-05-20 100,00 $ 2003-05-14
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 3 2004-05-18 100,00 $ 2004-05-10
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 4 2005-05-18 100,00 $ 2005-05-09
Taxe finale 300,00 $ 2005-11-07
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 5 2006-05-18 200,00 $ 2006-04-03
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 6 2007-05-18 200,00 $ 2007-04-16
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 7 2008-05-19 200,00 $ 2008-04-16
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 8 2009-05-18 200,00 $ 2009-04-23
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 9 2010-05-18 200,00 $ 2010-04-19
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 10 2011-05-18 250,00 $ 2011-04-11
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 11 2012-05-18 250,00 $ 2012-04-30
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 12 2013-05-21 250,00 $ 2013-04-24
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 13 2014-05-20 250,00 $ 2014-04-25
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 14 2015-05-19 250,00 $ 2015-04-15
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 15 2016-05-18 450,00 $ 2016-05-10
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 16 2017-05-18 450,00 $ 2017-04-12
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 17 2018-05-18 450,00 $ 2018-03-13
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 18 2019-05-21 450,00 $ 2018-12-14
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
CENTRE DE RECHERCHE INDUSTRIELLE DU QUEBEC
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
ECOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPERIEURE
LAFLEUR, FRANCOIS
LAVILLE, FREDERIC
THOMAS, MARC
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Sélectionner Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Page couverture 2002-11-08 1 67
Dessins représentatifs 2002-03-01 1 23
Description 2002-05-28 13 575
Abrégé 2001-05-18 1 49
Description 2001-05-18 13 581
Revendications 2001-05-18 3 132
Dessins 2001-05-18 5 110
Dessins 2004-12-20 6 91
Revendications 2004-12-20 3 124
Description 2004-12-20 15 624
Dessins représentatifs 2005-12-19 1 10
Page couverture 2005-12-19 1 59
Correspondance 2001-06-21 1 25
Cession 2001-05-18 5 162
Cession 2001-11-07 6 296
Correspondance 2001-11-07 12 606
Cession 2001-11-09 3 81
Poursuite-Amendment 2002-05-28 10 352
Poursuite-Amendment 2002-11-13 1 61
Taxes 2003-05-14 1 26
Taxes 2004-05-10 1 30
Poursuite-Amendment 2004-11-24 2 57
Poursuite-Amendment 2004-12-20 20 581
Taxes 2005-05-09 1 26
Correspondance 2005-11-07 1 33
Taxes 2006-04-03 1 26
Taxes 2007-04-16 1 28
Taxes 2008-04-16 1 30
Taxes 2009-04-23 1 30
Taxes 2010-04-19 1 29
Correspondance 2010-10-06 2 51
Taxes 2011-04-11 1 26
Correspondance 2019-01-14 4 169
Taxes 2012-04-30 1 26
Taxes 2013-04-24 1 28
Taxes 2014-04-25 1 33