Language selection

Search

Patent 2407554 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2407554
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DESANDING WELLHEAD PRODUCTION
(54) French Title: METHODE ET APPAREIL DE DESENSABLEMENT POUR LA PRODUCTION A LA TETE DE PUITS
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 45/02 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/08 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/12 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/34 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PRICE, KEVIN D. (Canada)
  • HEMSTOCK, CHRISTOPHER A. (Canada)
  • BERKAN, BRUCE G. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • SPECIALIZED DESANDERS INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • SPECIALIZED DESANDERS INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: PARLEE MCLAWS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-06-20
(22) Filed Date: 2002-10-10
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-04-10
Examination requested: 2005-04-01
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A desanding vessel is connected to a fluid stream containing entrained particulates flowing from a wellhead. The vessel comprises an upper freeboard volume wherein the fluid velocity drops and particulates fall from suspension. Preferably the fluid stream is introduced offset upwardly from an axis of a horizontally-oriented cylindrical vessel, released particulates falling to accumulate in a lower belly portion. The freeboard volume is maintained using a depending flow barrier spaced from the fluid inlet and adjacent the vessel's outlet. A cleanout enables periodic removal of accumulations.

French Abstract

Un récipient de dessablage est connecté à un courant liquide contenant des particules entraînées s'écoulant d'une tête de puits. Le récipient comprend un volume d'espace libre supérieur où la vitesse du fluide diminue et les particules tombent en suspension. De préférence, le courant liquide est introduit en décalage vers le haut par rapport à un axe d'un récipient cylindrique orienté horizontalement, les particules libérées tombant pour s'accumuler dans une partie inférieure du ventre. Le volume d'espace libre est maintenu à l'aide d'une barrière d'écoulement espacée de l'entrée du liquide et à côté de la sortie du récipient. Un nettoyage permet le retrait périodique des accumulations.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION FOR WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: 1. A desanding vessel for removing particulates in a fluid stream, comprising: a fluid inlet adjacent a first end of the vessel and adapted for receiving the fluid stream, the fluid inlet discharging the fluid stream at an inlet velocity into a freeboard portion at a top of the vessel, the fluid stream in the freeboard portion having a cross-sectional area greater than that of the inlet for creating a freeboard velocity less than the inlet velocity such that contained particulates fall out of suspension; a fluid outlet from the vessel, the fluid outlet being spaced horizontally from the fluid inlet; and a flow barrier, depending from the top of the vessel and having a lower edge so as to direct the fluid stream below the flow barrier before the fluid stream discharges from the fluid outlet for maintaining the freeboard portion and forming a belly storage portion therebelow, the flow barrier further being positioned between the fluid inlet and fluid outlet and spaced from the fluid inlet so as to cause accumulation of particulates in the belly portion prior to the flow barrier. 2. The desanding vessel of claim 1 wherein the flow barrier is a downcomer weir. 7 3. The desanding vessel of claim 1 or 2 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis. 4. The desanding vessel of claim 1 or 2 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis extending substantially the length of said vessel wherein the fluid inlet discharges the fluid stream into the freeboard portion of said vessel via an inwardly extending fluid introduction means. 5. The desanding vessel of claim 4 wherein the fluid inlet discharges the fluid stream into the freeboard portion via said fluid introduction means along a fluid path which is substantially parallel to the axis. 6. The desanding vessel of claim 5 wherein the fluid inlet is offset above the axis of said vessel. 7. The desanding vessel of any one of claims 4 - 6 wherein the fluid inlet comprises an eccentric fitting for aligning said fluid introduction means offset from and above said axis, so that fluid is introduced into the vessel above said axis. 8. The desanding vessel of any one of claims 1 - 7 further comprising a cleanout port for periodically accessing and removing said particulates accumulated in the belly portion. 8 9. The desanding vessel of claim 8 further comprising: means for de-pressurizing the vessel before opening the cleanout port. 10. A substantially elongate, horizontal vessel for removal of particulates entrained in a fluid stream emanating from a petroleum well, comprising: a fluid inlet adjacent a first end of the vessel, adapted for receiving the fluid stream and discharging the fluid steam at an inlet velocity into an upper region of said vessel, such vessel having a greater cross-sectional area than said fluid inlet such that said fluid stream entering said vessel slows to a velocity less than said inlet velocity and particulates fall out of suspension and collect on a lower region of said vessel; a fluid outlet from the vessel, positioned in the upper region of said vessel for directing said fluid stream having particulates substantially removed therefrom from the vessel; a flow barrier, positioned in a path of flow of said fluid stream from said fluid inlet to said fluid outlet, said flow barrier directing the path of flow of said fluid stream thereunder; and a belly portion for accumulating said particulates prior to said flow barrier. 11. The vessel of claim 10 wherein the flow barrier is a downcomer weir for maintaining the upper region of said vessel. 9 12. The desanding vessel of claim 10 or 11 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis. 13. The vessel of claim 11 or 12 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis extending substantially the length of said vessel wherein the fluid inlet discharges the fluid stream into the upper portion of said vessel via an inwardly extending fluid introduction means. 14. The vessel of claim 13 wherein the inlet discharges the fluid stream into the upper portion via said fluid introduction means along a fluid path which is substantially parallel to the axis. 15. The vessel of claim 14 wherein the fluid inlet is offset above the axis of said vessel. 16. The vessel of any one of claims 13 - 15 wherein the fluid inlet comprises an eccentric fitting for aligning said fluid introduction means offset from and above said axis, so that fluid is introduced into the vessel above said axis. 17. The vessel of any one of claims 10 - 16 further comprising a cleanout port for periodically accessing and removing particles accumulated in the belly portion. 18. The vessel of claim 17 further comprising means for de- pressurizing the vessel before opening the cleanout port. 10 19. A substantially elongate, horizontal vessel for removal of particulates entrained in a fluid stream emanating from a petroleum well, comprising: an upper region; a lower belly region; a fluid inlet adjacent a first end of the vessel, adapted for receiving the fluid stream having an inlet velocity and discharging the fluid stream into said upper region of said vessel, said upper region having a greater cross- sectional area than said fluid inlet such that said fluid stream slows to a velocity less than said inlet velocity and particulates fall out of suspension and collect on said lower belly region of said vessel; a fluid outlet from the vessel, spaced horizontally from the fluid inlet and situated proximate a second opposite end of said vessel, positioned in said upper region of said vessel; and a flow barrier extending downwardly through said upper region so as to direct the fluid stream below the flow barrier before the fluid stream discharges from the fluid outlet, the flow barrier being positioned between the fluid inlet and fluid outlet and spaced from the fluid inlet to permit accumulation of said particulates in said lower belly region prior to the flow barrier. 20. The vessel of claim 19 wherein the flow barrier is a downcomer weir. 21. The vessel of claim 19 or 20 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis. 11 22. The vessel of claims 19 or 20 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis extending substantially the length of said vessel wherein the fluid inlet discharges the fluid stream into the upper portion of said vessel via an inwardly extending fluid introduction means. 23. The vessel of claim 22 wherein inlet discharges the fluid stream into the upper region via said fluid introduction means along a fluid path which is substantially parallel to the axis. 24. The vessel of claim 23 wherein the fluid inlet is offset above the axis of said vessel. 25. The vessel of any one of claims 22 - 24 wherein the fluid inlet comprises an eccentric fitting for aligning said fluid introduction means offset from and above said axis, so that fluid is introduced into the vessel above said axis. 26. The vessel of any one of claims 20 - 25 further comprising a cleanout port for periodically accessing and removing said particulates accumulated in the belly portion. 27. The vessel of claim 26 further comprising means for de- pressurizing the vessel before opening the cleanout port. 12 28. A system for removing particulates entrained in a fluid stream emanating from a petroleum well, comprising: a substantially elongate, horizontal pressure vessel , comprising: (i) an upper region; (ii) a lower belly region; (iii) a fluid inlet situated proximate a first end of said vessel and the upper region thereof, adapted for receiving said fluid stream having an inlet velocity and discharging the fluid stream into said upper region of said vessel, said upper region having a greater cross-sectional area than said fluid inlet such that said fluid stream slows to a velocity less than said inlet velocity and particulates fall out of suspension and collect in said lower belly region of said vessel; (iv) a fluid outlet from the vessel, situated at a second end of said vessel opposite said first end; (v) a flow barrier, extending downwardly through said upper region and situated proximate said fluid outlet so as to direct the fluid stream below the flow barrier immediately before the fluid stream travels upwardly and discharges from the fluid outlet, positioned between the fluid inlet and fluid outlet and spaced from the fluid inlet to permit accumulation of said particulates in said lower belly region; (vi) a clean-out port proximate said second end, to permit access to said vessel to remove particulates collected in said belly region during a cleaning step; (vii) means for depressurizing said vessel during said cleaning step; and 13 an inlet flow valve, situated proximate said fluid inlet on said pressure vessel; and an outlet flow valve, situated proximate said fluid outlet on said pressure vessel. 29. The system for removing particulates as claimed in claim 28, wherein said fluid inlet discharges said fluid stream into said vessel along substantially a horizontal longitudinal axis of said vessel. 14 30. A method for removing particulates contained in a fluid stream flowing from an existing wellhead, comprising: receiving the fluid stream at a fluid inlet, the fluid stream being discharged therefrom to a freeboard portion at a top of a vessel, the fluid stream in the freeboard portion having a freeboard velocity less than an inlet velocity of said fluid stream so that said particulates fall out of suspension; discharging the fluid stream from a fluid outlet spaced horizontally from the fluid inlet; and further comprising the interim step prior to discharging said fluid stream from said fluid outlet of: directing the fluid stream below a flow barrier depending from the top of the vessel for maintaining the freeboard portion and forming a belly storage portion therebelow, the flow barrier being positioned between the fluid inlet and fluid outlet and the flow barrier being spaced from the fluid inlet; and accumulating the particulates in the belly portion prior to said flow barrier so that fluid stream at the fluid outlet is substantially free of particulates. 31. The method of claim 30 wherein the vessel is cylindrical having a substantially horizontal axis, the method further comprising the step of discharging the fluid stream into the freeboard portion along a fluid path which is substantially parallel to the vessel's axis and offset above the vessel's axis. 15 32. The method of claim 30 or 31 further comprising periodically accessing the vessel and removing said particulates accumulated in the belly portion. 33. The method of claim 32 further comprising depressurizing the vessel prior to the periodic accessing and removing of said particulates accumulated in the belly portion. 34. The method of claims 30 or 31 further comprising periodically depressurizing the vessel prior to accessing and removing said particulates accumulated in the belly portion prior to the flow barrier. 16
Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.

CA 02407554 2005-04-O1 1 "METHOD AND APF~ARATUS FOR 2 DESANDING WELLHEAD PRODUCTION" 3 4 FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates i:o apparatus and methodology for the 6 removal of particulates such as sand from fluid streams produced from a well while 7 minimizing erosion of the involved equipment. 8 9 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Production from wells in the oil and gas industry often contains 11 particulates. These particulates could be part of the formation from which the 12 hydrocarbon is being produced, introduced ~>articulates from hydraulic fracturing or 13 fluid loss material from drilling mud or fracturing fluids or from a phase changes of 14 produced hydrocarbons caused by changing conditions at the wellbore (asphalt or wax formation). As the particulates are produced, problems occur due to abrasion, 16 and plugging of production equipment. In a typical startup after fracturing, a 17 stimulated well may produce sand until the ~Nell has stabilized, sometimes up to a 18 month. 19 In the case of gas wells, fluid velocities can be high enough that the erosion of the production equipment is severe enough to cause catastrophic failure. 21 High velocities are typical and are even designed for elutriating particles up the well 22 and to the surface. An erosive failure of this nature can become a serious safety 23 and environmental issue for the well operator. In all cases, particulate production CA 02407554 2005-04-O1 1 contaminates surface equipment and produced fluids and impairs the normal 2 operation of the oil and gas gathering system and process facilities. 3 In one prior art system, a pressurized tank ("P Tank") is placed on the 4 wellsite and the well is allowed to produce f'uid and particulates into this tank until sand production ceases. The large size of v:he tank usually restricts the maximum 6 operating pressure of the vessel to somethirn~ in the order of 1,000 - 2,100 kPa. In 7 the case of a gas well, this requires some pressure control to be placed on the well 8 to protect the P Tank. Further, for a gas ~Nell, the pressure reduction usually is 9 associated with an increase in gas velocity which in turn makes the sand laden well effluent much more abrasive. Other problems associated with this type of desanding 11 technique are that it is a temporary solution. If the well continues to make sand, the 12 solution becomes prohibitively expensive. In most situations with this kind of 13 temporary solution, the gas vapors are not conserved and sold as a commercial 14 product. An alternate known prior art system includes employing filters to 16 remove particulates. A common design is ':o have a number of fibre mesh bags 17 placed inside a pressure vessel. The fibre density is matched to the anticipated 18 particulate size. Filter bags are generally not effective in the removal of particulates 19 in a multiphase conditions. Usually multipha:~e flow in the oil and gas operations is unstable. Large slugs of fluid followed by a g~~s mist is common. In these cases, the 21 fibre bags become a pressure drop point and often fail due to the liquid flow through 22 filter. Due to the high chance of failure, the filter may not be trusted to remove 23 particulates in critical applications or where the flow parameters of a well are 2 CA 02407554 2005-04-O1 1 unknown. An additional problem with filters in most jurisdictions is associated with 2 cost of disposal. The fibre bags are considered to be contaminated with 3 hydrocarbons and must be disposed of in accordance to local environmental 4 regulations. Clearly there is a need for more versatile and cost effective system. 6 7 SUMMARY OF THE. INVENTION 8 Apparatus is provided which is placed adjacent to the wellhead for 9 intercepting wellhead fluid flow before and prior to entry to any operators equipment including separators, valves, chokes and all other downstream equipment. 11 A pressure vessel is inserted in the flowsteam by connecting it 12 adjacent to the wellhead and to the input high velocity field piping extending from the 13 wellhead. The vessel contains a freeboard volume having a cross-sectional area 14 which is greater than that of the field piping i~rom whence the fluids emanate. As a result, fluid velocity drops and particulates cannot be maintained in suspension. The 16 freeboard cross-sectional area is maintained through a downcomer weir or 17 depending nozzle at the vessel's exit which ensures that a minimum freeboard 18 volume and cross-sectional area is maintained for the collection of particulates, and 19 promotes maximum use of the freeboard area, thereby reducing the number of times maintenance of the system, by cleaning the freeboard area of accumulated 21 particulates, need be conducted. 22 3 CA 02407554 2005-10-04 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 2 Figure 1 is a cross-sectional side view of one embodiment of the 3 invention; 4 Figure 2 is a typical installation for wellsite service, such as that provided on a portable trailer; and 6 Figure 3 is a performance graph of the achievable gas rates while 7 still achieving particulate removal. 8 9 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT As shown in Fig. 1, a desander 10 comprises a substantially 11 horizontal, cylindrical, pressure vessel 11 having an inlet end 23 adapted for 12 connection to a wellhead piping 9 and fluid stream F, typically gas G and sand S. 13 As stated in the background and below, the fluid stream F may also contain liquid 14 L. A fluid inlet 12 comprises a nozzle 21 extending into an upper 16 freeboard 30 volume adjacent the top of the vessel 11. An eccentric fitting 31 17 shifts the axis A of the vessel 11 downward to form a belly storage portion 32 for 18 receiving and temporarily storing sand S. The nozzle 21 extends beyond the end 19 of the vessel 11 and into the freeboard 30 which minimizes localized wear. Gas G containing sand S enters through the fluid inlet 12 and is received by a 21 larger cross-sectional area of the freeboard 30. The velocity slows and sand falls 22 out of suspension. The freeboard 30 is maintained using means to ensure that 23 the particulate free fluid is collected by an outlet 13 from mid-vessel. 4 CA 02407554 2005-04-O1 1 This is achieved using either flow barrier such as a weir 40 as shown or by inserting 2 the fluid outlet into the vessel 11, away from the vessel wall. 3 As shown in Fig. 1, if a weir 40 is used, it is spaced from the fluid inlet 4 12 and positioned between the fluid inlet 12 and the fluid outlet 13. As shown in Fig. 1, both a wE:ir 40, and a fluid outlet 13, having a 6 downwardly extending portion which extends into the vessel 11, are used as a flow 7 barrier in a preferred embodiment. 8 The fluid outlet 13 for the ves,el 11 is preferably perpendicular and 9 upward, drawing from the lower level of the freeboard 30 volume. A quick release pressure-vessel compatible cleanout 50 is provided for 11 sand removal access. The vessel 11 must be depressurized before opening and 12 cleaning out particulates. Manual cleanout is performed although automated 13 cleanout could be incorporated without diverging from the intent of the invention. 14 A typical vessel 11 may be a 6" diameter, schedule 160 shell having a capacity for 8 million cubic feet of gas G per day and a corresponding and typical 16 collection rate of 1.5 gallons of particulates pE~r day. 17 The advantages of the system include: 18 ~ As the desander is more cost effective than a "P Tank", the 19 desander can be economically placed on a well for long term (substantially permanent) sand protection; 21 ~ With a pressure rating that allows it to operate at the wells 22 conditions, minimal pressure drop is experienced across the 23 vessel. The desander i > designed to exceed ASME code for 5 CA 02407554 2005-04-O1 1 pressure vessels. This permits the sand to be removed from 2 the flow stream without becoming erosive. 3 ~ Since the vessel is passive and has no moving parts, plugging 4 caused by particulates is not an issue. Sand is removed mechanically from the vE;ssel at regular intervals. By removing 6 the sand prior to it entering the producing system, contamination 7 of equipment and produced fluids is avoided. 8 . The vessel is capable of handling multiphase production and 9 has demonstrated the a~~ility to remove sand from both gas and oil streams. This result: in a wider application than the filter 11 methods. 6
Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2022-10-11
Inactive: Office letter 2022-07-22
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2022-06-13
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2022-06-13
Letter Sent 2020-11-27
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2020-09-01
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2020-07-07
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Letter Sent 2018-04-12
Inactive: Office letter 2018-04-11
Letter Sent 2018-04-11
Letter Sent 2018-04-05
Inactive: Office letter 2018-04-05
Inactive: Office letter 2018-04-05
Letter Sent 2018-04-05
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2018-03-28
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2018-03-28
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2018-03-28
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2018-03-28
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2018-03-12
Inactive: Office letter 2017-08-02
Letter Sent 2017-08-02
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2017-07-19
Inactive: Agents merged 2016-02-04
Letter Sent 2014-08-18
Letter Sent 2014-08-18
Letter Sent 2014-02-10
Inactive: Single transfer 2014-01-28
Letter Sent 2013-10-01
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2013-09-16
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2007-10-03
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2007-10-03
Grant by Issuance 2006-06-20
Inactive: Cover page published 2006-06-19
Pre-grant 2006-04-07
Inactive: Final fee received 2006-04-07
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2006-04-03
Letter Sent 2006-04-03
Inactive: IPC removed 2006-03-30
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2006-03-20
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: Office letter 2006-02-03
Withdraw from Allowance 2006-02-03
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2006-02-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-02-01
Inactive: Correspondence - Prosecution 2006-01-31
Letter Sent 2005-11-28
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-11-28
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-11-28
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-11-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-10-04
Letter Sent 2005-06-14
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-06-06
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-06-06
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2005-05-27
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2005-05-26
Inactive: Single transfer 2005-05-24
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-05-19
Letter sent 2005-05-12
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - paragraph 84(1)(a) of the Patent Rules 2005-05-12
Letter Sent 2005-05-06
Letter Sent 2005-04-26
Inactive: Compliance - Formalities: Resp. Rec'd 2005-04-01
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-04-01
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) fee processed 2005-04-01
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2005-04-01
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2005-04-01
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2005-04-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-04-01
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2005-04-01
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) 2005-04-01
Request for Examination Received 2005-04-01
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-10-12
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Notice Requiring a Translation 2004-05-10
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2004-04-10
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-04-09
Inactive: Incomplete 2004-02-10
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2003-02-25
Inactive: IPC assigned 2002-12-17
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2002-12-17
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2002-11-29
Correct Applicant Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-11-29
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2002-11-27
Application Received - Regular National 2002-11-27
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2002-10-10

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2004-10-12
2004-05-10

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-04-01

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SPECIALIZED DESANDERS INC.
Past Owners on Record
BRUCE G. BERKAN
CHRISTOPHER A. HEMSTOCK
KEVIN D. PRICE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2002-10-09 5 177
Representative drawing 2003-01-19 1 10
Abstract 2005-03-31 1 16
Description 2005-03-31 6 193
Claims 2005-03-31 11 273
Drawings 2005-03-31 3 55
Description 2005-10-03 6 192
Claims 2005-10-03 11 271
Abstract 2006-01-02 1 16
Abstract 2006-01-31 1 16
Claims 2006-01-31 10 261
Representative drawing 2006-05-29 1 16
Drawings 2002-10-09 3 801
Filing Certificate (English) 2002-11-28 1 159
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-06-13 1 109
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (incomplete) 2004-05-30 1 167
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2004-12-06 1 176
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2005-04-25 1 177
Notice of Reinstatement 2005-05-05 1 171
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-06-13 1 114
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2005-11-27 1 161
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2006-04-02 1 162
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2013-09-30 1 102
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2014-02-09 1 102
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2014-08-17 1 104
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2014-08-17 1 104
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2018-04-10 1 106
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2018-04-11 1 106
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2018-04-04 1 106
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2018-04-04 1 106
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2017-08-01 1 103
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2020-11-26 1 365
Correspondence 2002-11-26 1 14
Correspondence 2004-02-02 1 20
Fees 2005-03-31 2 61
Correspondence 2005-03-31 3 114
Correspondence 2006-04-06 1 38
Fees 2006-09-17 1 36
Fees 2007-09-16 1 38
Correspondence 2007-10-02 2 51
Fees 2008-09-24 1 40
Fees 2009-09-13 1 200
Fees 2010-09-20 1 200
Fees 2014-09-17 1 25
Fees 2016-08-31 1 25
Maintenance fee payment 2017-10-03 1 25
Correspondence related to formalities / Change to the Method of Correspondence 2022-06-12 7 160