Language selection

Search

Patent 2115449 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2115449
(54) English Title: VEHICLE SHAPE DETERMINATION SYSTEM
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE DETERMINATION DE LA FORME D'UN VEHICULE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01S 11/14 (2006.01)
  • G01S 5/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • COACHWORTH, SIMON (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • HEIN-WERNER CORPORATION (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • HEIN-WERNER CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: AVENTUM IP LAW LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2004-02-03
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-08-14
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-03-04
Examination requested: 1999-08-13
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB1992/001509
(87) International Publication Number: WO1993/004381
(85) National Entry: 1994-02-10

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
17623.0 United Kingdom 1991-08-15
16141.3 United Kingdom 1992-07-29

Abstracts

English Abstract



A vehicle measure system involves an array of microphones (18) and a spark
emitter (24, 46) mounted on a vehicle. Spark
ing produces sound bursts which travels to the microphones (18). From
detection of transmission times, the position of the emitter
(24. 46) is found. Sound velocities arc determined in various directions to
ensure the air is homogeneous, else corrections for
Sound speed variations are applied or data is rejected. Position data
determined from various microphones (18) are compared to
ensure repeated measurement accuracy. The apparatus includes simple circuitry
with fewer received signal processing channels
than microphones (18) and intelligent selection of active microphones in
consequence. An emitter can be connected to the upper
vehicle body via a bent coupler (78), which can pass around a wing for
example. This allows the system, which is ground based, to
be used for measurements of the upper vehicle body. The positions of
microphones (18) are determined precisely before use of the
system, using a calibration jig (124). Errors in microphone positioning are
then corrected for in the measurements.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





-18-

What is claimed is:

1. A method of vehicle measurement, comprising:

emitting a signal from an emitter attached to a vehicle
and receiving it at a plurality of signal receivers;

measuring transmission times taken between signal
emission and reception;

calculating from the transmission times speed data on
the transmission of signals in different selected directions;

calculating position data for at least one point on the
vehicle in dependence upon transmission times and/or speed
data; and

accepting the speed and/or position data only if the
speed data agree to within a predetermined range.

2. A method according to claim 1, in which if speed data in
different directions do not agree, the measurements are
repeated.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the emitted
signals are pulsed.

4. A method according to claim 3, in which the pulsed
signals emitted comprise sound bursts produced by application
or an electrical potential difference between a pair of
electrodes at the emitter resulting in electrical sparking.

5. A method according to claim 4, in which she signals are
received by microphones.

6. A method according to any of claims 1 to 5, in which the
speed data is calculated using the line array method operating
on the outputs of at least three receivers.





-19-


7. A method according to any of claims 1 to 5, using two
signal emitters P1, P2, and six active receivers disposed in
two parallel rows of three, in which each of the following
four emitter and receiver combinations are used as follows:-

(i) first emitter P1 and receivers in the first row,

(ii) first emitter P1 and receivers in the second row,

(iii) second emitter P2 and receivers in the first row,

(iv) second emitter P2 and receivers in the second row.

8. A method according to any of claims 1 to 7, including
averaging speed values which agree to within the predetermined
range and using the resultant in determination of position
data.

9. A method according to any of claims 1 to 8, including
selectively compensating position data in dependence upon
speed variations in different directions.

10. Vehicle measurement apparatus for use in the method of
claim 1, comprising:

at least one signal emitter (45) for attachment to a
vehicle;

a plurality of signal receivers (18) for receiving
signals emitted by the emitter(s); and

means (42,44) for measuring transmission times between
signal emission by the emitter(s) and reception by the
receivers, for calculating from the transmission times speed
data on the transmission of signals in different selected
directions, for calculating position data for at least one
point on the vehicle in dependence upon transmission times
and/or speed data, and for accepting the speed and/or position
data only if the speed data agree to within a predetermined
range.





-20-

11. Apparatus according to claim 10, in which if the speed
data in different directions do not agree, the measurements
are repeated.

12. Apparatus according to claim 10 or 11, in which the
signals emitted by the emitter(s) are pulsed.

13. Apparatus according to claim 12, in which the pulsed
signals comprise sound bursts produced by application of an
electrical potential difference between a pair of electrodes
at the emitter resulting is electrical sparking, and in which
the receivers are microphones.

14. Apparatus according to any of claims 10 to 13, in which
there are at least three receivers (18).

15. Apparatus according to claim 14, in which the speed data
is calculated using the line array method.

16. Apparatus according to any of claims 10 to 15, in which
there are two signal emitters P1, P2, and six active receivers
disposed in two parallel rows of three, and four speed values
are calculated using each of the following four emitter and
receiver combinations:-

(i) first emitter P1 and receivers in the first row,
(ii) first emitter P1 and receivers in the second row,
(iii) second emitter P2 and receivers in the first row,
(iv) second emitter P2 and receivers in the second row.

17. Apparatus according to and of claim 10 to 16, including
means which, if the speed values agree to within the
predetermined range, averages the values and uses the
resultant in determination of position data.




-21-
18. Apparatus according to any of claims 10 to 17, including
means for selectively compensating position data in dependence
upon speed variations.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



WO 93/04381 PCT/GB92/01509
i.~ .c. .l . .:~ l
VEHICLE SHAPE DETERMINATION SYSTEM
The present invention relates to vehicle measurement
systems, in particular to systems to determine the shape of
vehicle bodies such as automobile bodies.
Prior Art
A vehicle measurement system as described in European
patent application EP-A-0244513 for example, comprises emitters
of acoustic pulses, microphone receivers and microprocessor
controls. The terms "acoustic" and "sound" are here used for
convenience to include also "ultrasound". The emitters a:re
mounted at various predetermiiled positions on a vehicle body, and
are triggered under microprocessor control. Triggering generates
an acoustic pulse which travels outwards from an emitter and is
detected by a number of microphones. The microprocessor measures
travel times of the pulse from the emitter to each of the
receivers. Sufficient data is acquired to yield the
three-dimensional coordinates of a given point when processed by
the microprocessor.
In order to calculate positions, microphones must be
placed in a configuration which is known to the microprocessor.
In the disclosure of EP-A-0244513, six :microphones are placed
with equal separations along each side of a beam which is
positioned below the vehicle and spans the width of the vehicle.
If a vehicle has been involved in a crash, its upper
part is often distorted near the contact region. Measurements
of the misalignment of such parts of the vehicle body are
conventionally undertaken using a large ruler and slide
arrangement. This is mounted over the vehicle, for example over
the bonnet, and the vernier scale is read to determine the
position of a point in the damaged region.
Some Problems of the Prior Art
Prior art systems such as described in EP-A-024513
suffer from a number of problems. These include errors ir.
l

CA 02115449 2003-11-05
position measurements due to temperature variations and air
turbulence in the environment of the vehicle under test which
affect the speed of sound. For example, even a l~C variation in
temperature over a measurement volume of approximately
4m x 2m x 0.5m would cause unacceptable errors. Also, air
turbulence causes serious fluctuations in the data, making it
unreliable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention in its various aspects is defined in the
appended claims to which reference should now be made.
We have appreciated that for a preferred vehicle
measurement system to be useful in practice, it must be capable
of operating in a garage environment where precautions against
air currents and temperature variations are necessarily
minimal. Also, it must be able to compensate for small
localised variations in air conditions and must be capable of
detecting when unacceptable conditions are present and measured
position data should be rejected.
In a first aspect, this invention relates to a method of
vehicle measurement, comprising:
emitting a signal from an emitter attached to a vehicle
and receiving it at a plurality of signal receivers:
measuring transmission times taken between signal emission
and reception;
calculating from the transmission times speed data on the
transmission of signals in different selected directions;
calculating position data for at least one point on the
vehicle in dependence upon transmission times andlor speed
data; and
accepting the speed andjor position data only if the speed
data agree to within a predetermined range.
In a second aspect, this invention relates to vehicle
measurement apparatus for use in the method of claim 1,
comprising:
at least one signal emitter (46) for attachment to a
vehicle;
a plurality of signal receivers (18) for receiving signals
emitted by the emitter(s); and
means (42,44) for measuring transmission times between
-2-

CA 02115449 2003-11-05
signal emission by the emitters) and reception by the
receivers, for calculating from the transmission times speed
data on the transmission of signals in different selected
directions, for calculating position data for at least one
point on the vehicle in dependence upon transmission times
and/or speed data, and for accepting the speed and/or position
data only if the speed data agree to within a predetermined
range.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A preferred vehicle measurement system will now be
described by way of example with reference to the drawings, in
which:
Figure 1A is a perspective view of a beam for ultrasound
measurement, and an emitter probe;
Figure 1B is a schematic diagram showing the wheels and
mounting plate of the beam in cross-section;
Figure 2 is a view of a portion of the beam carrying six
active microphones;
Figure 3 is a diagram showing separations of the six
active microphones from a spark (an ultrasound source);
Figure 4A is a diagram of the beam indicating microphone
interconnections;
Figure 4B is a cross sectional view of the beam;
Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the vehicle measurement
system showing connections to microphones of one half of the
beam (one module);
-2a-

WO 93/04381 "' 1 ~ '~ ~'~ ~' ~ PCT/GB92/01509
Figure 6A is a view of an emitter probe in longitudinal
section;
Figure 6H is a cross-sectional view through the emitter
probe in the plane AA shown on Figure 6A;
Figure 6C is a cross-sectional view of an extension to
the emitter probe;
Figure ?A is a top view of an upper body coupler;
Figure ?B is a view of a ball and socket joint of the
MacPherson probe;
Figure 8 is a simplified perspective view of a jig for
beam calibration; and
Figure 9 is a cross-sectional view of the jig shown in
Figure 8 together with its stand;
Figure 10A is a schematic.and sectional view of one
spark assembly of the beam calj.bration jig;
Figure lOB is a front view of the spark emitter
assembly shown in Figure 10A;
Figure 11 i:; a simplified perspective view of another
jig for beam calibration;
Figure 12A is a schematic and sectional view of one
spark assembly of the other jig;
Figure 12B is a front view of the spark assembly shown
in Figure 12A; and
Figure 12C is a rear view of the spark assembly shown
in Figures 12A and 12B.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment-
The reader is referred to EP-A-0244513 as background.
Apparatus
The system for vehicle measurement comprises a single
beam 10 as shown in Figures 1A and 1B, which is mounted
longitudinally with respect to the vehicle. The beam 10 is made
of extruded aluminium of an approximately rectangular
cross-section (approximately 17.5 em by 7.5 cm) and is
approximately 3.6m long. It consists of two independent modules
12,14 as shown in Figure 4A. Referring back to Figure 1A, each
'.. __.~..._. _..._..._.. ... ....,.. , ,. >.."~.,.~. ,. r...... .. ...,. ...
~.. re..~~tt ..s..7....~-;:. .......... .... ...::::e.:~,r. . .u.~~.. :.... .
... i.. t .... ....

WO 93/04381 . l ~ 'L. ;~ ~~ ~ ~ PCT/GB92/01509
E" ~. i_
,.,c.,
beam has two opposing sides 16,16 which carry twenty four
microphones 18 each. Accordingly, the beam has twelve
microphones along each edge 20 of a side 16, which is twice as
many as disclosed in EP-A-0244513. Also, only a single beam is
used rather than a series of transverse beams. The beam 10 has
six sockets 22 on each side for emitter probe assemblies 24 and
two transmit/ receive reference blocks 26 mounted on each side.
The beam 10 is rigid and is mountEd on pairs of wheels
33 fixed under the beam 10 at points which result in minimum
bending. Each wheel is connected to the beam by a supporting arm
35. As shown schematically in Figure 1B, these wheels 33 drop
into and run along runners 37 farmed by the undercut sides of a
mounting plate 39. A mounting plate 39 is placed under each
vehicle to be measured. In use, the beam 10 is easily removed
from the mounting plate 39 under one vehicle and positioned on
the mounting plate 39 of the next vehicle to be measured.
As shown in cross-section in Figure 4B, the beam has a
cable duct 28 which is separated from the body 29 of the beam by
a partition 31. Also, it has a series of holes 30 on each edge
20 of a side 16 to receive the microphones 18. The beam has
longitudinal internal grooves 32 in which printed circuit boards
(PCB's) 34 are mounted. fihe PCB's hold microphone circuits 36 as
described below with reference to Figure 5 and can be connected
together. The beam includes screw mounts 38 near its ends for
screwing end plates (not shown in Figure 4B) to the beam 10. The
end plates include handles for carrying the beam 10.
The basic electrical circuitry of the vehicle
measurement system which is shown in Figure 5, includes the
microphones 18 of one of the modules 12, 14 of the beam 10 and
microphone circuits 36, emitter probe assemblies 24 and spark -
generation circuits 40. The microphone circuits 36 and spark
generation circuits 40 are connected to CPU and timer circuits 42
for automatic control and measurement. The CPU and timer
circuits 42 are coupled to a remote computer 44.
In use the emitter probes 46 are mounted to the car
body at selected points to be measured using various fixtures.
The microphones 18 along the beam 10 detect sparks emitted by the
probes 46, allowing the positions of the probes 46 and hence the
_ 4 _

WO 93/04381 ~ ;. .(. v ~ ~ ~ PCT/GB92/01509
selected points on the car body to be measured.
Referring back to Figure 1A, an emitter probe assembly
24 comprises an emitter probe 46 with a spark generator 48 at , .
each of its two ends (at positions Pl and P2). The probe
assembly 24 also includes a location accessory 50 which is
mounted on the end of the probe portion near Pz, and is used to
fix the probe to the vehicle body at a predetermined position Ps.
As shown in Figure 6A, the probe 46 includes spark generators 48
each comprising a pair of wire electrodes 52,54 and a ceramic
insert 56 through which the wires pass. Electricity is supplied
via leads 58. The probe 46 includes an annular magnet 60 in its
end 62 near position P2. The location accessory 50 is fixed to
this directly or with an extension 64 or series of extensions
inbetween.
As shown in Figure 6~B, the measurement probe 46 is of a
substantially triangular cross-section at its two end portions 66
on which spark generators 48 are respectively mounted (positions
P1 and P2). Thus, the spark generators 48 are each mounted at a
triangle 'apex'. Accordingly, a pulse signal is emitted which
travels in a wide-angled arc.
As shown in Figure 6C, an extension 64 has a
cylindrical~body 68 with a spigot 70 of magnetisable material at
one end 72 and an annular magnet 74 of rare earth material at the
other end 76. The spigot 70 is for insertion into the annular
magnet 60 of the probe end 62, which is shown in Figure 6A, or
. alternatively, into an annular magnet 74 of an end 76 of another
extension 64. Spigots 70 and annular magnets 60,74 cooperate by
magnetic attraction to hold probes and extensions together. The
probe assembly 46 is then mounted on the extension 64 as shown in
Figure 1 to provide a lengthened probe assembly.
Such a lengthened probe assembly is useful when a probe
assembly must be filed in a recess in the vehicle body. The user
is instructed whether or not an extension is required by the
microprocessor in response to stored data concerning the vehicle
in question.
The probe 46 is fixed to the car body directly or with
the use of an extension 64, using any of a variety of location
accessaries 50. As a car body typically has made holes, for
_ 5 _

WO 93!04381 ~ 1 .t. " ti '-~ ~ PCT/GB92101509 '
example to allow door hinges to be fixed, one type of locatior.
accessory 50 is for fitting in holes. It includes two jaws
which are moved radially outwards to grip the rim of the hole.
Another type has three pinchers which can grip onto exposed
,.
bolt-heads, nuts and the like. A third type is threaded for
mounting on exposed bolt ends. All location accessories include
a magnetisable spigot for cooperation with an annular magnet 60,
74 of an emitter probe 46 or extension 64.
Another way to connect an emitter probe 46 to a
location accessory is by using an upper body coupler 78, as shown
in Figure 7A. This is particularly suitable for position
measurements of parts of the upper car body such as a front
suspension strut. A vehicle has two front suspension struts
under its bonnet, one on either side. A front. suspension strut
is conventionally known as a,MacPherson strut. The upper end of
a front suspension strut ends in a dome through which a threaded
bolt protrudes. The upper body coupler 78 is connected to the
boat by a location accessory 50.
The upper body coupler 78 can also be used connected to
the car body by a location accessory at an appropriate hole in
the bodywork such as around the door frame. The upper body
coupler 78 has a body 80 consisting of a rod in a U-type shape.
The body 80 has t~~ro rounded 90° bends 82.84 and three
substantially straight portions 86,88,90. One end 92 of the body
80 includes a fixture 94 on which a ball-and-socket joint 96 is
mounted, in an axis parallel to that of the second portion 88 of
the body 80 and facing the other end 98 of the body 80.
As shown in Figure 7B, the joint 96 comprises a ball
100 fixed at the apex of a conical element 102. The conical
element 102 is attached to fixture 94 by its threaded knurl 104
being screwed in to a threaded hole 106 in the fixture 94. The
ball 100 is rotatable within a socket 108 of a ball housing
(chuck) 110. The end 112 of the chuck 110 opposite the socket
108 has an annular magnet 114 which is flush or 'sub-flush' with
that end 112. This allows the upper body coupler 78 to be fitted
to the vehicle body by magnetic attraction to a location assembly
50 mounted on the car body.
The other end 98 of the body 80 of the upper body
_ 6 _

WO 93/04381 . ~ .~ _~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ PGT/GB92/01509
coupler 78 includes a second fixture 116 for connecting the probe
46. The second fixture element 116 has two sides 118,120, from
each of which a spigot 122 of magnetisable material extends. The
probe 46 (with or without extensions) 64) is fixed by an
operator on one side or other of the second fixture element 116
such that the end 62 of the probe 46, or the end 76 of a probe
extension 64 on which the probe 46 is mounted, is fitted on one
of the two spigots 122,122.
In use, the position of the end 92 of the upper body
coupler 78 which is connected to the car body is calculated from
the spark generator positions P1,P2. This is possible because
the separation between the two ends 92,98 of the upper body is
known as are the lengths of extensions b4 and the dimensians of a
probe 46. The microprocessor "knows" that the spark generator
positions P1, P2 and the upper body coupler end 92 lie along the
same axis and instructs the user which extensions, probes and
fittings to use. Accordingly, the position of the end 92
connected to the car body is automatically determined,from the
measured sgark positions P1,P2 by the microprocessor.
Methods
For an explanation of the basic methods used for
vehicle measurement, the reader is referred to EP-A-0244513.
Other details are provided later in this description. The beam
is positioned on a mounting plate so as to be approximately
parallel to the length of the vehicle body. The position of the
beam is not critical. By the use of software driven menus, the
user instructs the measurement system, which is microprocessor-
controlled, of the type of vehicle being measured. Specifically,
the user selects the appropriate manufacturer, model and
model-type. The appropriate information files for that vehicle
are then loaded and a graphical representation of that car body
displayed on the visual display unit (VDU) of the microprocessor.
The representation includes points on the car body for which
standard relative positions are known.
The user first chooses some reference points on the
vehicle body, then selects some other points he wishes to
measure. He is aided ir. this by the microprocessor which allows

WO 93/04381 '~' ~ '~ ~ ~~ '~ ~ PCT/GB92/01509
expanded (zoom) displays of selected regions of the vehicle
representation.
The microprocessor then "intelligently" instructs the
user which location accessory 50, extensions (if any) 64 (or
coupler 78) to use at each of the selected points. The reference
points are taken from an undamaged part of the vehicle body, and
define three perpendicular reference planes (length, width,
height). Positions of other points are then measured relative to
the reference planes defined by the reference point data.
We have found that to achieve acceptable accuracy in
determining the position P3, it is necessary to determine the
relative positions of P~ and P~ to within about 0.5mm and the
absolute positions to within about l.5mm. This in turn implies
that the linear distances between the spark generators and
collecting microphones must be known to within 0.1 to 0.2mm.
Ultrasonic measurement in 3 dimensions is far more prone to error
than linear measurement where a reference system can work
effectively. If a fined reference were relied upon for 3
dimensional measurement the required accuracy would not be
possible.
Calculation of Sound Velocity and Emitter Position
In order to convert time data received by the microprocessor into
distance data, the velocity of propagation of sound must be known
. accurately. However, the velocity of sound varies as a function
of temperature (also pressure, humidity and C0~ content).
Consequently, any measuring system must be able to determine the
velocity of sound in selected regions in order to accurately
calculate distance data.
It has been found that by a suitable choice of receiver
array, a set of equations can be used to find coordinates which
do not depend on separately calculating the velocity of sound.
The equations are listed in EP-A-024451. The array consists of
at least six microphones arranged as sets of three in two
parallel lines. Through calculations the velocity of sound and
Cartesian coordinates of the emitter are found. The arrangement
of- emitter and microphones is illustrated in Figure 6D of
EP-A-0244513 and the equation used to calculate velocity,
g _


WO 93/04381 ' ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/GB92/01509
V = SQRT(2Lzlta2+t~z-2to2) is mentioned there. This method of
velocity determination is denoted the line array method.
The method allows sound velocity in a localised area to
be measured automatically without the need for a reference spark.
Although the basic method is known, in order to be useful in
practice, we have found that more microphones are required than
has been mentioned in the prior art. Specifically rows of 12
microphones are distributed along the beam rather than merely six
as mentioned in EP-A-0244513. Still furthermore, calibration of
microphones, as will be described below, allows the line array
method of velocity measurement to be used accurately in practice.
It also eliminates the need for high accuracy positioning of the
microphones upon manufacture.
Consistency check of position data
Taking the nearest six active microphones to a spark
generator as shown in Figures 2 and 3, measurements of position
are repeated using three different microphone sub-sets as
follows:
(i) 1, 2, 3,
4


(ii) 3, 4, 5,
6


(iii)1, 5, 2;
6


The x, y, z position values that each subset provides
are rejected if they are too different from the values calculated
using the other subset(s). If accepted, the results for x, y
and z from the three microphone sub-sets are averaged.
Taking the first sub-set as an example, microphones 1
and 3 are used to provide an x coordinate value x1, and
microphones 2 and 4 give xz. Then x~ and xz are averaged to give
the x coordinate va,iue. The z coordinate value is found
similarly, then the y coordinate found using x and z results.
Detection of Temperature Variations (Air homoQeneitvl and
Unstable Air Conditions
By analysing the data received by a group of six
microphones, information on temperature gradients and turbulence
can be gained. Taking a group of six active microphones as shown
_ g _

WO 93/04381 ~, ~, ~ ~j t~ ~ ~ PGT/GB92/01509
in Figures 2 and 3, it is possible to detect vertical temperate
gradients. The line array method of sound velocity detection is
used to determine four velocity values from four planes as
follows:-
(i) Spark produced at Pl detected at microphones 2, 4, 6
(Time delays B, D, F)
(ii) Spark produced at P1 detected at microphones 1, 3, 5
(Time delays A, C, E)
(iii) Spark produced at P2 detected at microphones 2, 4, 6
(Time delays B, D, F)
(iv) Spark produced at P~ detected at microphones 1, 3, 5.
(Time delays A, C, E)
If the four velocity_values agree, they are averaged to
give the speed of sound and the subsequent measurements of
emitter position are accepted.
It is possible t~ detect vertical temperature gradients
and compensate for them (provided there is no significant air
turbulence). As a further check it is also possible to detect
unstable air conditions (homogeniety in the longitudinal axis) by
checking ratios of distances (i.e. time delays) using the six
active microphones, as shown in Figure 3. Taking the six time
delays (which are related to distances) A, B, C, D, E, and F
Which were measured and a constant K found as CZ - D2, by
defining a parameter R and assuming RcD = 1, the following are
calculated:-
RAB =- A/
REg - E/,,
Only if R~ and Rig are equal to unity (i.e. 1~ 0.005)
can the position data be considered valid.
Simple Circuitry
As shown in Figure 1A, there are a total of 48
microphones along a beam. By connecting microphones together as
- 10 -

WO 93/04381 '~ '' ~' '~ ~' ~ ~ PGT/GB92/01509
shown in Figure 4A it is possible to use only 16 channels of
microphone circuitry for one beam (2 reference channels are also
used). Correspondingly, for one module of a beam, 8 channels are
used as shown in Figure 5.
Despite the reduced number of channels, the active
microphone array (i.e. the six microphones 18 closest to the
spark) is readily located. The received data from microphones on
the bottom row which pass via channels 0 to 4 are examined by the
microprocessor and the three shortest time delays are selected.
Then using the following simple analysis, the correct active
microphone array, A to D as shown on Figure 5, is determined:-
If the sum of the 3 relevant channel numbers = ~ then we are
working with array A
'f the sum of the 3 relevant channel numbers = 9 then we are
working with array D
If channel 1 is the shortest delay when we are working with
array B
If channel 2 is the shortest delay then we are working with
array C.
Measurement Accuracy
Measurement accuracy is affected mainly by errors in
the placement of microphones 18 in the beam 10.
The correction factors which must be applied to
compensate for errors in microphone positioning will vary
depending on the directions of approach of the sound to the
microphone 18 so this must be known approximately before a
correction can be applied.
The system produces a spark at a probe 46, collects the
received data, then computes the approximate spark coordinates
(P1 and P2). From this, it determines the approximate direction
of the sound to each of the 6 microphones and determines the
appropriate correction factorsd x, ~ y, L~,~z to modify the collected
data. These correction factors follow:
11 _


WO 93/04381 PCT/GB92/01509
:.. , (. I . cJ ,
X,~T ~,
A Y=X.~. r
l
~DIS':'V - -'~IS'~~
~~ ~ I S'.
,vy=~ .. r
XDIST~ ' ' ~ISTZ - '~TS'~'~~.
Z~IS~'
pz=z.. "
~~ _: -
FIST ~= HIS'"'
where xazsT, yD=sue, ZczsT denote the approximate coordinate
position of a spark generator relative to a microphone. The
data is then re-processed to accurately determine the true spark
coordinates.
The factors x~, y=, x~ are determined from calibration
of beams 10 at the factory as will be described below.
Beam Calibration/Calibration of Microphone positions
The beam calibration jig 104 which is shown in Figure 8
(perspective view) and in Figure 9 in cross-section, provides the
array of 24 spark assemblies 126 required for calibration of the
beam 10. The calibration jig 124, which is mounted on a stand
128 (not shown in Figure 8), is surrounded by an insulating cover
(not shown) to provide a thermally stable environment around the
beam during calibration.
The beam is clamped in a fixed, nominally central,
position 130 within the jig 124 in a manner which prevents any
twisting or bending stress. The jig includes a frame I32
comprising upstruts 134 and cross-bars 136. One spark assembly is
shown in Figures 10A and 10B.
The temperature inside the jig is thermo-control'_ed by
- 12 -

WO 93/04381 N ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ PCT/GB92/01509
a heater under the jig (not shown) and a set of tan thermocouples
(not shown) disposed at various places around the jig such as
against the frame, near the heater or with ends extending out
into the air.
The coordinates of each spark assembly 138 are
determined to within 0.2mm in the three principal axes. This is
achieved by photogrammetry or theodolite survey of the assembled
jig 100. Targets are fitted to the face of each spark assembly
for this purpose. Spark assemblies 126 are designed to be easily
replaced in the event of failure without invalidating jig
calibration data.
The spark generators 138 are housed in PTFE
(polytetrafluoroethylene) support plates 140 as shown in Figure
10A. These permit minor adjustment in all three axes. Each
spark generator 138 includes a spark emitter i39 within a PTFE
insulating ring 142. A spark assembly 138 is held in place on a
PTFE support plate by a nut 144 and bolt 146. The bolt 146
passes through an oversized hole 14~ in the upstrut 134. To
allow adjustment of emitter positions, the PTFE plate 140 is
moveable in two directions in its position on an upstrut 134 by
means of one vertical adjustment screw 148 and two horizontal
adjustment screws 150. The PTFE plate 140 is fixed adjustably to
the upstrut 134 by four screws 152 with washers 154. The screws
152 pass through the PTFE support plate 140 via oversized holes
156.
After the positions of the spark emitters have been
surveyed to establish their relative positions, a grid of four
spark emitters (pairs on neighbouring upstruts on a selected side
of the beam) are then fired in sequence and the timing data is
collected from the six microphones facing the grid. Using the
known spark position the precise X,Y and Z coordinates of each
microphone is deduced (using the same equations as those used for
the beam itself, described in EP-A-0244513). The x~, y= and z~
deviations of each microphone from its surveyed coordinates are
calculated and stored in the hardware of the beam (in eeprom), to
be read every time the vehicle measurement system is turned on.
Measurements using the jig and subsequent calculations
to determine calibration data are made under computer control.
- 13 -

WO 93/04381 ~~, ~. 1_ ~ ~ 'j' ~~ PCT/GB92/01509
After calibration, a print-out of calibration data is also
provided.
The jig includes a reference bar (not shown) having a
microphone and spark emitter at each end, such that the
microphone at one end is of known separation from the spark
emitter at the other end. By measuring the time delay between
emission and reception of a spark, sound velocity is calculated.
Knowing velocity and spark emitter positions precisely allows
microphone positions to be determined accurately.
Another beam calibration jig 158 is shown in Figure 11.
It is 70 cm high, lm 30cm wide and 3m 50cm long. It includes a
frame 160 having seven sets of cross-bars 162 and up-struts 164.
Also, it has a rigid, stable base 168. The beam 10 for
calibration is placed at position 168 on adjustable stands
1?0,170. ..
The beam calibration jig 158 shown in Figure ll~has 112
spark assemblies. One spark assembly is shown in Figures 12A,
12B and 12C. The coordinates of each spark assembly is
determined to within 0.04 mm in each principal axis.
As shown in Figure 12A, each spark assembly 172
includes positive and negative wires 174,176 held in epoxy resin
potting 178 within an aperture 180 in.a PTFE mount 182. The
electrode wires 174,176 are connected to electricity supplies
(not shown) through a ceramic insert 184. Each spark assembly
172 is held in position on a mounting plate 186 by means of a
pair of screws 188,18$ with washers 189 which are screwed into
one side 190 of the mounting plate 186 and abut the rear 19fl of
the PTFE mount 182. As shown in Figures 12A and 12C, a
screwed-on retaining spring 192 which has an approximately
horse-shoe shape is fixed on the other side 194 of the mounting
plate 186. This spring 192 keeps the PTFE mount 182 of the spark
assembly 1?2 within the mounting plate 188 whilst allowing the
electrode wires 174,170 to be exposed.
A Tvnical Measurement Seguence
A typical sequence is as follows:-
- 14 -


WO 93/04381 ; . PC"f/GB92/01509
..~ .t ~ ~ ~.#
1) Fire the reference sparks and check for unacceptable
air currents.
2) ' Fire the sparks at P~ and PZ
3) Collect the count data (time delays) from the 8
microphone channels
4) Determine whether left or right side of beam is active
from the probe channel number which is being used
5) Find the 3 lowest counts from the microphone channels
on the bottom row. Process the data to determine which
array of 6 microphoDes is closest to the spark and sort
data ~~to the appropriate sequence
6) Using the current speed of sound taken from the
reference channels calculate the approximate X, Y and Z
position of each spark at positions P~ and P2
7) Determine the angle of the sound path to each
microphone in the active array
8) Apply appropriate correction factors calculated from
the beam calibration data
Calculate the speed of sound using the "line array"
method in 4 planes; P~ to top row, P~ to bottom row, P2
to top row and~Pz to bottom row
10) Check that the air conditions are homogeneous in the
longitudinal axis. The ratio of time delays from a
spark to each vertical pair of microphones can be
determined theoretically. If the data does not agree
in practice then the speed of sound must vary within
the volume.
- 1v -


WO 93/04381 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/GB92/01509
11) Check that the speeds of sound derived from the 4
"line array" planes do not imply too great a vertical
temperature gradient. If the data are inside a given
tolerance, convert the time delays to distances, using
the 4 plane measurements (step 9) to compensate far
small temperature gradients.
12) Calculate the X, Y and Z dimensions using microphones
1, 2, 3 and 4, then 3, 4, 5 and 6, and 1, 2, 5, 6, as
shown in Figure 2.
13) Check that the variation between results is acceptable.
If so average the results.
14) Check that the calculated distance between P1 arid P2
agrees with the known (constant) distance.
15) Repeat steps 2 to 14 for each probe which is attached.
(There may be up to twelve probes).
16) Fire the reference sparks. Check for unacceptable air
currents and for consistency with results of step 1.
17) Translate the measured coordinates to give data related
to length, width and height relative to the vehicle and
display these results.
If a measurement fails any of these checks the system
automatically repeats the measurement several times. If the
failure was due to minor turbulence or some other temporary
disturbance a subsequent measurement may be successful.
If inaccurate data is consistently obtained the
controlling computer can collate all the available probe and
reference data ('Good' or 'Bad') and present meaningful reasons
for the failure and suggestions for rectification to the user.
- 16 -

PCT/GB92/01509
WO 93/04381
Remote Computer Control
The measuring system :s controlled by the remote
computer which also contains a database of vehicle data and
graphics. The user can change the language at the touch of a
button. All text and user interactions (i.e. typing Y for yes N
for No etc.) are language dependent.
It will be appreciated from the above that the
preferred~system is more than simply a measurement system relying
on detecting time delays to compute distances, but is capable of
assessing the local air conditions at the time that the emitter
probe is fired. It can determine whether the collected data is
valid and also whether its own calibration is still good.
- 17 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2004-02-03
(86) PCT Filing Date 1992-08-14
(87) PCT Publication Date 1993-03-04
(85) National Entry 1994-02-10
Examination Requested 1999-08-13
(45) Issued 2004-02-03
Expired 2012-08-14

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1998-08-14 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 1998-10-14

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1994-02-10
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1994-08-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1994-08-15 $100.00 1994-08-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1995-08-14 $100.00 1995-07-31
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1996-08-14 $100.00 1996-08-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1997-08-14 $150.00 1997-08-06
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 1998-10-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1998-08-14 $150.00 1998-10-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1999-08-17 $150.00 1999-08-06
Request for Examination $400.00 1999-08-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2000-08-14 $150.00 2000-07-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2001-08-14 $150.00 2001-08-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2002-08-14 $200.00 2002-08-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2003-08-14 $200.00 2003-07-25
Final Fee $300.00 2003-11-05
Expired 2019 - Filing an Amendment after allowance $200.00 2003-11-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2004-08-16 $250.00 2004-07-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2005-08-15 $250.00 2005-07-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2006-08-14 $250.00 2006-07-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2007-08-14 $450.00 2007-07-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2008-08-14 $450.00 2008-07-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2009-08-14 $450.00 2009-07-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2010-08-16 $450.00 2010-07-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2011-08-15 $450.00 2011-07-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HEIN-WERNER CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
COACHWORTH, SIMON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1998-08-05 1 11
Representative Drawing 2003-06-10 1 11
Description 1995-09-16 17 766
Description 2003-11-05 18 799
Cover Page 2004-01-07 1 51
Claims 2002-07-29 4 116
Cover Page 1995-09-16 1 20
Abstract 1995-09-16 1 61
Claims 1995-09-16 9 372
Drawings 1995-09-16 13 319
Claims 1999-09-02 9 334
Fees 2000-07-27 1 33
Fees 2001-08-07 1 36
Fees 1999-08-06 1 32
Fees 1997-08-06 3 82
Assignment 1994-02-10 7 248
PCT 1994-02-10 19 692
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-08-13 1 33
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-01-29 2 67
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-07-29 6 182
Correspondence 2003-11-05 2 63
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-11-05 4 143
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-12-02 1 15
Fees 1998-10-14 1 36
Fees 1998-10-20 1 75
Fees 1996-08-14 1 46
Fees 1995-07-31 1 42
Fees 1994-08-10 1 43